MadRat
Cheese Raider
Montreal is an Iroquois city? Really?! That is so wrong.
they should have used Hochlega then and saved Montreal for the Canadian civ DLC and its zamboni UU
Rat
Montreal is an Iroquois city? Really?! That is so wrong.
they should have used Hochlega then and saved Montreal for the Canadian civ DLC and its zamboni UU
Rat
It makes sense both ways.
Ragusa was the capital of Sicily, and that essentially finishes off the main Italian city-states (sicily has been kind of important).
The Sicilian kingdom's capital and chief city was Palermo. As it was for the county, and emirate.
Montreal is an Iroquois city? Really?! That is so wrong.
Sounds crazy, but plausible.![]()
All these are in the game except Vienna, Prague, Montreal and Amsterdam. Did you not notice them? I think they may be keeping some, like Amsterdam or Carthage for future DLC releases.
The prosperity of the city of Dubrovnik has always been based on maritime trade. In the Middle Ages, as the Republic of Ragusa, also known as the fifth Maritime Republic (together with Amalfi, Pisa, Genoa and Venice), it became the only eastern Adriatic city-state to rival Venice. Supported by its wealth and skilled diplomacy, the city achieved a remarkable level of development, particularly during the 15th and 16th centuries.
The other Ragusa is already part of the Ottoman city list.![]()
I disagree with the choice of Stockholm, Helsinki, (I think there is Oslo too), that's too many scandinavian cities...why not Reykjavik?
This may sound a bit crazy, but hear me out.
So I was browsing Civilopedia reading the historical descriptions of city states when I stumbled on Ragusa.
Spoiler :
Located on the island of Sicily, Ragusa is an Italian city of some 75,000 inhabitants. A port city situated almost directly in the center of the Mediterranean, Ragusa is some 3,500 years old. Originally settled by the native Sicels (ancient Sicilians), over its long history it has been conquered by the Greeks, Carthaginians, Romans, Arabs, Normans, French, and Spanish. Ragusa was the seat of the Kingdom of Sicily, created in the mid-12th century, and then part of the Kingdom of Two Sicilies under the Bourbons. In 1860 it became part of unified Italy.
Ragusa is constructed on a wide hill. A huge earthquake in 1693 devastated the city, and few of the original buildings survived. The city was largely rebuilt in the 18th century, in the process making it a marvel of Baroque architecture.
Ragusa's economy is based upon agriculture - especially olives - light manufacturing, and tourism. Ragusa is a beautiful city, with numerous museums and churches (including the wonderfully-named ""Church of Purgatory""). The Marina di Ragusa is a famous seaside resort, and the area boasts some of the least crowded beaches in Sicily.
Although not the biggest or most popular city in Sicily, Ragusa is beautiful and rich with culture and history - certainly worth conquering if one has an army or fleet in the area.
I can understand the fine churches and everything, but having an "olive based" agriculture and being steamrolled by a dozens nations seems a little suspicious to qualify it for a Civilization game.
So I decided to search a bit more about this city, and found out there was another city named Ragusa, which is now called Dubrovnik and lies in Croatia.
After pondering for a while, it became clear to me that the Civilopedia description should write about Dubrovnik and not the Italian Ragusa. Mainly because:
- there are already 3 italian cities in the game; and if they were to include yet another italian city, why not choose a more important one: Milano, Napoli, Torino, etc.; choosing a city from another part of the world would make more sense
- Croatian Ragusa called itself Maritime Republic while italian Ragusa is a landlocked city
- Dubrovnik (croatian Ragusa) has a more colorful history IMO, while about the italian one there isn't much to say.
- Dubrovnik was a trully city state (Republic of Ragusa: 1358-1808), while the italian one was NOT
So my theory is that the person who wrote the Civilipedia entry was if not drunk, at least dumb enough to write about Italian Ragusa just because it appears first in Google. I believe it was the intention of the developers to include Dubrovnik in the game.
Sounds crazy, but plausible.![]()
Ok you're probably right about Milan and Napoli, it makes sense. But why another Italian city and why make it maritime and not cultured. From the Civilopedia entry it's clearly entitled to be cultured, while the in-game city is maritime.