anarres
anarchist revolutionary
I gave it a 7, but after the big bugs are removed maybe I'd let that go up to a 9....
Rate Conquest!
- Thread starter Yoda Power
- Start date
Commander Bello
Say No 2 Net Validations
I just gave it a 6.
Apart from (some) nice conquests, they have brought back some bugs of the past. If you have a look at the editor, you get the impression that they lost the interest in updating the units. Stats for the two new governments seem not have been finished.
No artwork for the new wonders. Still there is this annoying 512 cities limit, making maps > 200*200 tiles almost senceless...
And so on, and so on...
Apart from (some) nice conquests, they have brought back some bugs of the past. If you have a look at the editor, you get the impression that they lost the interest in updating the units. Stats for the two new governments seem not have been finished.
No artwork for the new wonders. Still there is this annoying 512 cities limit, making maps > 200*200 tiles almost senceless...
And so on, and so on...
Mongoloid Cow
Great Khan
Originally posted by Yoda Power
Then you should properly state which of the options are correct
Alright, I don't have the game
Schmek
civil engineer
7 - since the dutch should be commercial.
- a few buggy problems.
- This way I can be more possitive about fixes
- a few buggy problems.
- This way I can be more possitive about fixes
bru
Prince
I gave it a 9. I look at the game as to its entertainment value rather than the games perfection.
Plug
Warlord
To Bru, does that mean you don't really think that the fact that corruption is so broken as to make the game useless is not a problem?
When the AI builds the Forbidden Palace it will automatically gain a disadvantage. Also, human players can't have the amount of high production they should have.
I suppose that's okay if you want to play Civ JUST for fun. But if you like to challenge yourself and play for high scores the game is next to useless since high scores and games played now will have no relation to games and high scores reached when the patch is released.
Since the fun I obtain from Civ these days is mainly from trying to win the game and get high scores Conquests is useless to me until corruption is fixed. In fact, I can't understand how such a second rate product could be released. I'm realy disappointed.
When the AI builds the Forbidden Palace it will automatically gain a disadvantage. Also, human players can't have the amount of high production they should have.
I suppose that's okay if you want to play Civ JUST for fun. But if you like to challenge yourself and play for high scores the game is next to useless since high scores and games played now will have no relation to games and high scores reached when the patch is released.
Since the fun I obtain from Civ these days is mainly from trying to win the game and get high scores Conquests is useless to me until corruption is fixed. In fact, I can't understand how such a second rate product could be released. I'm realy disappointed.
bru
Prince
As I said in my last post I look for entertainment value. If I found that the game was annoying me I would either wait for a patch or quit playing!
This pole did ask my opinion.
This pole did ask my opinion.
ShiplordAtvar
Texan by the grace of God
I gave it 9 of 10, with the tenth point being withheld due to the lack of beer coupons in the C3C box. I want cheaper beer!!!
Fanny Brice
Prince
9... I'm factoring in the fixes and tweaks of pending patch with this vote. Enjoying it even more than Civ3 Vanilla and PTW.
