Ratification Poll Article E (resubmitted)

[Cyc]

Too bad you only hang in the poll sub-forum, ravensfire. You'd be able to answer your own question.

 

[ravensfire]

Too bad you only hang in the poll sub-forum, ravensfire. You'd be able to answer your own question.

Ah yes, that small thing buried in a poorly titled thread. Saw it. Laughed at it. One small law, still too complex.

Sorry, Cyc, if you want to drive the framework in better direction, much effort needs to be made to work with those drafting amendments to keep general info in the Con, and details in lower law. That's not being done.

Interestingly enough, our rush to start this actually gave us no real way to pass a lower set of laws. You can't create a proposed law that sets the rules on passing laws, then use those rules to pass that law. Cart before the horse, you know? Wonderful quagmire we created for ourselves with our haste.

-- Ravensfire

 

[Cyc]

@ ravensfire, as I metioned to zorven, the law that governs the parameters of passing amendments to the CoL in prior Demogames was in the CoL. The CoL was created and included in those Laws was a way to amend them.

As you know, I was not responsible for starting before we were ready, so laugh it up. I've been laughing at your ineffective attempts to change the game, too. Good thing we're old friends, eh?