What, you've never seen a ruling for a subsequent case come to a different conclusion than the previous case? Happens all the time in RL, no reason it couldn't happen here. It doesn't even have to overrule the previous result, it merely defines the law for a broader, narrower, or different set of conditions, depending on circumstances.
But precedent carries alot of weight in a legal system, especially one that purports to treat everyone equally. I guess I'll defer judgement on this until a subsequent case arises.
Finally, I have time to respond to Hyronymus.
I must say you don't give up easily and that's good but you do return to your habit of spreading your truth as the absolute truth we should all listen to.
But the absolute truth is the absolute truth.

And, no, I do not give up easily.
Really, that's your opinion. If I look at the replies in this thread I cannot see how others agree with you.
As I've said before I'm willing to negotiate on the start window. 12 hours is definately too long. 6 also seems too long. As I've also said before this must be looked at along with the ending deadline. Do you have a specific counter-proposal?
Still, it could be placed in the Playing The Save Act too. More baldly: why not merge both Acts?
Look how much work it takes to get one proposal to a vote. Trying to update or merge two at a time is even worse.
No, it is created to give DP's ample time to post their instructions.
No, it was created to let citizens have ample notification of when the save will be played. I know why it was initially proposed becasue I proposed it.
If you just wrote that instead of what you did write...
You are right and the wording will be made clearer in this proposal.
But why do you want that? What is the problem with it?
The whole point of the initiative is to let citizens know when the save will be played. By allowing a loophole that lets a DP play anytime after the scheduled start the inititative loses force and fails to do what it is intended to do. Why do you want to let DPs play several days after they schedule a session?
No, please tell me this is a joke. Do you actually believe this is something that may happen? I admit, life is bizar but this is really over the top.
It is possible. To tell the truth I never thought I'd see a DG judiciary rule that the game play scheduling initiative did not mean the DP had to post the exact time he was to play. I guess I've gotten a little paranoid in my old age. Why are you against a deadline for gettign the session ended?
What you're saying is that if this is an oopsie then it's OK, the Judiciary made one too after all. An eye for an eye...
If you really think the judiciary made an oopsie then why aren't you trying to help correct it?
Again: why? So you can attend it?!
No, I do not attend game play sessions. The reason is that citizens will have a proper notice (or warning if you will) of when the save will be played. Once agian, that is what this initiative is about.