Room for a new XP?

[thestonesfan]

No, the sub problem is still there.

Yes, it's hypothetical, but so is 99% of the topics discussed on these boards.

For the record, I would prefer they focus all their energies on Civ4.

 

[erickcid]

Longasc: I agree Civ: Complete should live up to its name. I have hopes that in its final retail version it will be perfectly bug free. I suspect that is a major goal of the shipping version, freeing up all possible resources for Civ 4 development, as well as gaining money for development. I will buy it regardless of what is included. A great little feature that may get some previous owners and resistors to buy is including the Complete version on a single DVD, one install, and using the extra space for bonus material.

 

[SesnOfWthr]

Stonesfan - If I go by what you said was included (I realize you don't really know), then my waffling ends with a firm no. I will not go spend thirty bucks, or whatever, on some conquests that I can't play. As for units and civs for mods, well, I can get twenty discs full for free down in the C&C forum, now can't I?

I would only buy it if it had new playable civs (maybe swappable like someone - denyd? - said), new UU's, perhaps a new tech or tow, and maybe some new buildings/wonders. In other words, if they make the epic game better, sure. If not, then no.

 

[alamo]

I can get all kinds of goodies for free here - why pay for yet another patch?

I hope Civ4 gets some kind of interactive combat option.

 

[thestonesfan]

Stonesfan - If I go by what you said was included (I realize you don't really know), then my waffling ends with a firm no. I will not go spend thirty bucks, or whatever, on some conquests that I can't play. As for units and civs for mods, well, I can get twenty discs full for free down in the C&C forum, now can't I?

I would only buy it if it had new playable civs (maybe swappable like someone - denyd? - said), new UU's, perhaps a new tech or tow, and maybe some new buildings/wonders. In other words, if they make the epic game better, sure. If not, then no.

Why can't you play the conquests?

 

[Alexnm]

Never thought I would say this, but I wouldn't buy a new XP for Civ3... I think that there is no more room for adding things, and, frankly, five or eight new civs wouldn't do the trick this time for me. I usually don't play scenarios, so I think that whatever they could put in a new XP would not be of interest to me.

And as someone said before, Civ IV is on the horizon, I think that I'll wait for it now - plus I still think that I can have fun with Conquests until they release Civ IV.

 

[homeyg]

I would definately buy a new XP for CivIII if it came with some new scenarios and units and if it fixed all remaining bugs without creating any new ones.

 

[truckingpete]

With Civ 4 around the corner....I'll just wait...I can wait....I can wait...

 

[Fake Gustave]

No the maximum number of expansions a game should have is 2.(ideally it should be none, saves me money).

btw what game has the most expansions, not including "the sims"

 

[davidcrazy]

i didn't even buy the conquest, not to mention another expansioin...
i like ptw and will stick with it.