Saturns signal?

Now youre saying we have enough information to conclude its a natural phenomenon. Did you change your mind?

No one is "concluding" that it must never never be anything other than a natural phenomenon. We are just starting with the educated guess that it is natural, which is common and so far regarding to outer space, 100% correct. That may change of course, if we find that some phenomenon, perhaps this one, that does not look natural. However, we are not at that point yet.
 
Would you say that this is man-made or natural?

IMGA2428.JPG
 
Bozo et al:

Wouldn't it be that the null hypothesis is [it's probably natural but we want more info], and a counter-hypothesis is [it's probably artificial but we want more info]?
 
No one is "concluding" that it must never never be anything other than a natural phenomenon. We are just starting with the educated guess that it is natural, which is common and so far regarding to outer space, 100% correct. That may change of course, if we find that some phenomenon, perhaps this one, that does not look natural. However, we are not at that point yet.
Theres just a very subtle little thing seperating us, which Ive been having trouble getting across since the first page. If we're exploring a brand new world, and as you said in the other post, we only have information about a ridiculously small sample of planets, on what do we base our assumptions? Thats why taking our Earth assumptions with us wouldnt help us at all, theyd be a hindrance. We know Jack Schitt about planets, and even less about life (one planet with life, and counting). Whats wrong with saying, 'We dont know'. Because in truth, we really dont know.
Would you say that this is man-made or natural?

IMGA2428.JPG
Hmmm...looks like a picture I saw the other day of old plates taken from a shipwreck. But Im going to take a wild guess and say its some sort of crystalline thing. 'I dont know'. ;)
Bozo et al:

Wouldn't it be that the null hypothesis is [it's probably natural but we want more info], and a counter-hypothesis is [it's probably artificial but we want more info]?
Or a third, like [lets hold off on putting a label on it until we've actually gathered some data].
 
Back
Top Bottom