My vote for settling on the cows is not based on the benefits for the capital whatsoever, but rather for being able to actually use the hills we can see, by feeding a second city to the west - what if there is no food resource out there? We get left with a city that can only work two tiles because there's no growth.
I know we're working with incomplete information, but I feel that although KM's test was quite valuable, I don't think it takes the whole picture in to account.
Also if Remco is right in his guess about the inland sea, no fish is a pretty big loss for a large part of the game.
Anyway, the consensus is settling in place, which I fell will definitely be a solid start regardless. We should definitely focus on micro more this game, it really helped us improve in the last one, and should push us further forward in this one.
I don't have any complaints with pigswill's PPP, but I'll have a bit of a play with potential ideas this afternoon.
I know we're working with incomplete information, but I feel that although KM's test was quite valuable, I don't think it takes the whole picture in to account.
Also if Remco is right in his guess about the inland sea, no fish is a pretty big loss for a large part of the game.
Anyway, the consensus is settling in place, which I fell will definitely be a solid start regardless. We should definitely focus on micro more this game, it really helped us improve in the last one, and should push us further forward in this one.
I don't have any complaints with pigswill's PPP, but I'll have a bit of a play with potential ideas this afternoon.