OopsEh, Obormot, we learned the final space tech in 1425.
Now if we take into account the detour to sanitation, which the Wacken's didn't take it's about the same.

Well, i agree that we played suboptimally, first of all i think that we grown our cities too slowly (for me the golden rule in research games is grow to size12 first, then build stuff, but we sometimes slowed growth down to get that lib or market built sooner - a mistake imho, but argueable though) and another mistke was that we invested too much gold into long-term stuff (by stopping research and rushing libs, settlers, etc. And then the gained long-term effect was actually wasted because we were researching in 4 turns at just 30% science at some moments). But i still think that monarchy was a mistake that slowed us down about as much as stuff i metioned above. I don't think that the unit support outweighs the commerce bonus, remember that we had a lot of MP and fought wars with lots of cheap units instead of few expensive ones.And I still don't see the big mistake in monarchy. We were a little bit late to the IA, but that was more a question of suboptimal play IMO, than the government. Through ancient and medieval we would have payed a lot more unit support cost and lux tax (we did pay even in monarchy).
Well, 4-turn IA only means that our IA in monarchy came too lateWe did all IA techs except 2 and all MA techs in 4 turns each. Now, sure republic would have given more money in that time, but for what ?
