Hehe, with me, most people including those that know me for years also have the problem of not knowing when i am joking

Most of the time i am half-joking and leave it to understand the real interpretation to the listener
No, gozpel, i didn't mean to say anything bad about you.
For the civ4 thingy: I suggest we start on monarch and my prefered race is the Industrious and financial Chinese who start with mining and agriculture.
And if you want my opinion about the game so far: The graphics are not that bad, just need to get used to it.
The best games ever made in history have 1 thing in common, they have very simple rules and options, but a great strategical depth. (Chess, go, poker etc...)
Civ4 has an awfull lot of rules and options. It is vastly over complicated.
I personally am a warmongerer, and building a strong economy (trough conquest) is IMO the essence of strategy games, and that is what i play them for. It would be nice if civ4 provides the player the option to play the game in his style, so that one can play it very agressively or very culture minded if he wants. However, here is that grey meaningless puddle, you are forced to play how the game wants you to play, wich is the grey puddle with a bit of everything. The game blends eggs with coca cola and pineapple (and another dozen of ingredients maybe) all in one. You cannot choose to focus on one
Well, of course i have not played many hours yet and maybe a better game knowledge will make it nicer to play, but this is how i see it at this moment.