I.Larkin, no problem with me for playing. Mabellino is next(according to the roster).
Nice thinking about the deals, and good suggestions about our next cities.
What do the other members think about our cities placement? I'd like a tighter placement. More cities mean more units, gold, easier to attack our ememies, faster terrain improvement and therefore quicker developement, etc...(the AI has the bad habit of spreading too far). We can have a few SOD's early and take on our enemies sooner, rather than waiting for them to declare. Only from industrialization and after do our cities need more space to grow, and by then it'll be too late for the AI

. If you don't want city-2 tiles-city, at least we can go for city-3 tiles-city, but further placement would result at having the same power and productivity with the AI. Don't get me wrong, I also don't like tile overlaps, but since I moved up from chieftain and warlord, I found it very effective. Please comment.