You might find it useful to read through a couple-few succession games here in the forum. (
Here.) A succession game is when a number of players take turns controlling a civ in a game and discuss their plans and strategies on the forum. I find SGs more interesting, usually, than single-person walkthroughs, because of the various viewpoints and styles of play of different participants.
Many SG players use lots of abbreviations and take some knowledge for granted, but some are quite good writers and you should often be able t'tell what's going on. SGs often, but not always, include self-imposed restrictions on the team, which can be anything from "we must burn every holy city except our own" to "we aren't allowed to build any improvements, even roads".
There are worse ones to start with than
this one, Cuban Isolationists, in which Sulla and Sirian play a game as Spain... on a lake. Civ 4 was new (so no mechanics from Warlords or Beyond the Sword are involved), so the two were pretty explanatory about what they were doing and why. They did play it a little coy at times, because they were both involved a bit in its development. Both are very good players and entertaining writers, tho', and the game is fun to follow along.
There's quite a few other good ones out there, probably about as many worth reading as not; if you click the "rating" at the top of the forum thread list, it will sort out those that were well-rated by forumgoers. Almost all of the four- and five-star SGs are totally worth a look.