Share your games!

I just lost the following game against a guy who was only ~100 points higher than me before the game.
Site: Chess.com
Game: Let's Play
Move time: 1/3 days
White: WhiteEagle
Black: hunter_man25

Moves:
1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 f6
3.Bc4 Ne7
4.O-O c6
5.d3 d5
6.Bb3 Bg4
7.h3 Bxf3
8.Qxf3 Na6
9.Nc3 Ng6
10.Bd2 d4
11.Ne2 Nc5
12.Bc4 Nh4
13.Qg3 Ng6
14.Rae1 b5
15.Be6 Nxe6
16.b3 Bd6
17.a4 Qd7
18.Bb4 Bxb4
19.Rd1 Bd6
20.f3 Ngf4
21.Qh2 Nxe2+
22.Kh1 Nc5
23.Rfe1 Nc3
24.Rd2 f5
25.Qf4 exf4
26.e5 Bc7
27.e6 Nxe6
28.g4 fxg4
29.fxg4 O-O-O
30.Kg1 f3
31.Rf1 Rhf8
32.Rff2 Qd5
33.Kf1 Bf4
34.Rfe2 fxe2+
35.Ke1 Qh1+
36.Kf2 Bh2# 0-1

I thought that this was a game I could have won. Guess I blundered big somewhere again!:(
 
I just lost the following game against a guy who was only ~100 points higher than me before the game.


I thought that this was a game I could have won. Guess I blundered big somewhere again!:(

Well 15 Be6 simply gifted him your bishop, you could have retreated to b3. Three moves later you give away your second bishop which wasn't even threatened. :(

OTOH, the opening seemed solid :)
 
At least that is something I can be thankful for!

I'm not going to make any moves today, as I've already been up for 21 hours as of posting this reply, and I won't be able to go to bed until 9 pm tonight, for a grand total of 35 hours total up between sleeps. :(
 
I haven't had the energy to post the games from my second week at the Swedish chapionships but maybe I'll do that later. Frankly, I'm embarresed I played so badly but I was a little fortunate and managed to win the group with 5/7 (3 wins and rest draws). So I'll be playing in class II next time. :trophy:
 
At least that is something I can be thankful for!

I'm not going to make any moves today, as I've already been up for 21 hours as of posting this reply, and I won't be able to go to bed until 9 pm tonight, for a grand total of 35 hours total up between sleeps. :(
That is usually very wise. Whenever I make moves (or play blitz) when I am very tired I usually regret it.

I haven't had the energy to post the games from my second week at the Swedish chapionships but maybe I'll do that later. Frankly, I'm embarresed I played so badly but I was a little fortunate and managed to win the group with 5/7 (3 wins and rest draws). So I'll be playing in class II next time. :trophy:

Undefeated is nothing to scoff at Panz! :)
 
I don't use any particular opening, and judge moves one at a time. I think it helps to be a bit flexible, so that I can respond if I see an opening or a blunder. It may not be wise, but at least it's better than nothing IMHO.
 
I don't use any particular opening, and judge moves one at a time. I think it helps to be a bit flexible, so that I can respond if I see an opening or a blunder. It may not be wise, but at least it's better than nothing IMHO.
It is always good to be flexible, if you play 100% by rote you may miss a brilliancy!

Just played probably one of my best games on chess.com. Probably made plenty of inaccuracies but overall I was pleased with the game. It suited my style as an "anti-gambiteer" (I like to take material & run, when I play gambits myself I often run into trouble though there are some I like to play). I missed my opponent's idea behind 21. ... Ne5 (trading two pawns for a piece) but it worked out ok for me anyway. I love having a queenside mass of pawns like in this game. Props to DaveShack for a hard fight. The battle for 2nd place in WhiteEagle's tournament depends on our 2nd match (unless I pull off a miracle & manage a draw with Colin here. I don't expect to hold onto my spot over 2200 long, I have three probable losses pending in the next few weeks.

Comments welcome on the game (not the one vs. col still in motion)!

This game is not mine to share but our team's (mostly Riffraff, myself & nicetoall), I felt we were holding it together fairly well as was looking forward to an exciting endgame but their team timed out. :undecide:
 
Nice game Narz!

I wasn't really trying to play a gambit, it was just where the book led. At some point I thought "that wasn't such a good idea, I hate gambits". :crazyeye:

I'm going to run this through my engine and the chess.com engine and see how the analysis compares. Here's what mine said, at 45 seconds/move.

Spoiler engine analysis :


1. e4 c5
2. c3 d5
3. exd5 Qxd5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 e6
6. Be3 Be7
{ Last book move}

7. dxc5 Qxd1+
8. Kxd1 O-O
9. Nbd2 Ng4
10. b4 Nxe3+
11. fxe3 D Nc6 += D
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.24 / +0.65}


( 11...a5 12.Bb5 axb4 13.cxb4 Bf6 14.Nd4 e5 15.N4f3 e4 16.Nd4 Rd8 17.Re1 Bf5 18.Rf1 Bxd4 19.exd4 Bg4+ 20.Be2 Bxe2+ 21.Kxe2 Rxd4 = )

12. Kc2 =
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.65 / +0.36}


( 12.Bb5 Bd7 13.Bd3 a5 14.b5 Na7 15.c6 bxc6 16.Ne5 Rad8 17.b6 Nb5 18.Kc2 f5 += )

12. ... a5
13. Kb3 D Bf6?! +=
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.25 / +1.12}


( 13...axb4 14.cxb4 b6 15.Bb5 Na7 16.Bd3 bxc5 17.b5 Rd8 18.Kc2 Bb7 19.a4 Bf6 20.Rad1 Nc8 = )

14. Ne4 Be7
15. Nd6 Bf6
16. Rd1 D Rd8 +/-
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +1.38 / +1.69}


( 16...Ra7 17.Bb5 axb4 18.cxb4 Bd7 19.a4 Rd8 20.a5 Be7 21.Rhf1 f5 22.Bd3 Bf6 += )

17. Bb5 e5
18. Bc4 Rf8
19. Nxc8 Raxc8
20. Rd7 e4 D
21. Nd4? =
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +1.59 / -0.23}


( {DS: I looked at this as a possible continuation:} 21.Nd2 Ne5 D 22.Rxb7?! += { Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +1.60 / +0.77}
( 22.Rd5 b6 23.Ba6 Rcd8 24.Rxd8 Rxd8 25.Nxe4 bxc5 26.Nxf6+ gxf6 27.b5 c4+ 28.Kc2 Ng4 29.Re1 Rd3 30.b6 Nxe3+ 31.Kb2 Rd2+ 32.Kb1 Nf5 33.Bxc4 Rxg2 +/- )
22...Rfd8 23.Nxe4 a4+ )
( {Toga's alternative } 21.Nd2 Ne5 22.Rd5 Rfd8 23.Rd1 Kf8 24.a4 Ng4 25.Nxe4 Nxe3 26.Rxd8+ Rxd8 27.Rxd8+ Bxd8 28.Nd6 Nxg2 29.Nxb7 +/- )

21. ... Ne5
22. Rxb7 a4+
23. Kxa4 Nxc4
24. Re1 D Nb2+ =
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: -0.23 / +0.15}


( 24...Bg5 25.Nf5 g6 26.h4 Bf6 27.Ne7+ Bxe7 28.Rxe7 Nd2 29.Kb5 Ra8 30.Ra1 Rfb8+ 31.Kc6 Ra6+ 32.Kd5 Rd8+ 33.Ke5 Kg7 = )

25. Kb5 D Nd3 =
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.00 / +0.25}


( 25...Ra8 26.c6 Be5 27.Re2 Nd1 28.Kc4 Ra3 29.Nb5 Nxc3 30.Nxa3 Nxe2 31.g3 Rc8 32.b5 Kf8 = )

26. Rf1 D Ne5 +=
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.19 / +0.52}


( 26...Bg5 27.Nf5 Ra8 28.a4 g6 29.h4 Bf6 30.Nd6 Bxc3 31.Kc4 Bg7 32.Nxe4 Nb2+ 33.Kb3 Nxa4 = )

27. Nf5 D Ng4 +=
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.36 / +0.80}


( 27...Rcd8 28.a4 Rd2 29.Nd6 Rxg2 30.c6 Rd2 31.Nxe4 Rd5+ 32.Nc5 Rc8 33.c4 Rd6 34.c7 Rc6 35.Ne4 R6xc7 36.Rxc7 Rxc7 37.Nxf6+ gxf6 38.Rg1+ Kf8 = )

28. h3 Ne5
29. Nd6 Ra8 D
30. a4?! += D
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +1.43 / +0.87}


( 30.c6 Bg5 31.Nxe4 Bxe3 32.c7 Ng6 33.Nd6 Ne7 34.Re1 Bf4 35.Rxe7 Bxd6 36.Rd7 Be5 37.a4 Bxc3 38.a5 Rfe8 += )

30. ... Rab8?! +/-
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +0.87 / +1.72}


( 30...Bg5 31.Nxe4 Bxe3 32.Re1 Bf4 33.Nd6 f5 34.a5 Rad8 35.a6 g6 36.Rd1 Nf7 37.Rb6 Rd7 38.c4 Ne5 += )

31. c6 Bg5
32. Nxe4 Bxe3 D
33. Re1 +/- D
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +2.11 / +1.84}


( 33.Nd6 h6 34.Rd1 Ra8 35.c7 Ng6 36.Nxf7 Bf4 37.Nd6 Ne7 38.a5 Be5 39.c4 Bf4 40.a6 Bh2 41.Rb8 Raxb8+ 42.cxb8=Q Rxb8+ 43.Kc5 +/- )

33. ... Bh6 +/-
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +1.84 / +2.09}


( 33...Bf4 34.g3 Nxc6 35.Kxc6 Rfc8+ 36.Kb6 Bc7+ 37.Ka6 f5 38.Nc5 Bxg3 39.Ree7 Rxb7 40.Kxb7 Rb8+ 41.Kc6 Rc8+ 42.Kd5 Kf8 43.Rd7 +/- )

34. Nc5 Bf4
35. Rxe5 Bxe5
36. Nd7 D Rxb7+?? +-
{ Toga II 1.2.1: Analysis reports mistake, with score change from/to: +3.42 / +7.49}


( 36...Rbd8 37.Nxf8 Kxf8 38.a5 Rd5+ 39.Kc4 Rd8 40.a6 Rc8 41.Kb5 Ke8 42.a7 Kd8 43.Rxf7 Ke8 44.Rb7 h6 45.Rd7 Bxc3 +- )

37. cxb7 Rd8
38. Nxe5

( 38.Nxe5 { 13:+12.72} 38...Rb8 39.Kb6 Re8 40.Nd7 f6 41.b8=Q Kf7 42.a5 Re6+ 43.Kb5 Ke7 44.a6 Rxa6 45.Qf8+ Kxd7 46.Qxg7+ Ke6 47.Kxa6 h6 48.Qxh6 )
 
Thanks Dave. I'll check out where your analysis engine said mistakes were made (which one do you use? oh, nm, Toga II, I hadn't heard of it before). I rarely even use chess.com's analysis engine anymore. It missed a great tactical resource I had in one game (giving the position at +4.2 whereas Panzar's chessmaster engine gave it +10.9 or something).

To share a new one, I beat chess.com's founded Erik in a game of Chess960. Fun, tactical game, I never even got around to castling. :D

http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=23014166
 
sorry for having this posted on a different thread .. .:-( . . but now its in the correct place, and I would like to know your thoughts..

I dont know if this was an excellent win or I was just playing with a weak player... anyway I post my game... and I hope to get some comments... I'm playing white.

1.d4 e6 2.c4 Qf6 3.Nf3 Na6 4.e3 d5 5.Nc3 c6 6.Be2 Bd7 7.O-O b5 8.cxb5 cxb5 9.Nxb5 Bxb5 10.Bxb5+ Kd8 11.Bxa6 g5 12.Bb5 g4 13.Qd2 Rb8 14.Qa5+ Kc8 15.Qa6+ Rb7 16.Qc6+ Rc7 17.Qa8# 1-0
 
1.d4 e6 "Horwitz Defense" (I was surprised this has a name)
2.c4 Qf6 It's rarely a good idea to bring out the queen first
3.Nf3 Na6 Knights are usually better closer to the center
4.e3 d5
5.Nc3 c6
6.Be2 Bd7
7.O-O b5 Black is now lagging severely in development, and this creates a target
8.cxb5 cxb5
9.Nxb5 Bxb5
10.Bxb5+ Kd8
11.Bxa6 g5 Again, not developing any K-side pieces
12.Bb5 g4
13.Qd2 This gives back the piece, Ne5 is a much better move
...Rb8 Missing a chance to get back a piece mess up white's K-side by taking the knight
14.Qa5+ Kc8 For the remaining moves, black doesn't put up the best defense, but white can still win easily against a better defense by bringing in more pieces
15.Qa6+ Rb7
16.Qc6+ Rc7
17.Qa8# 1-0

By delaying development of the k-side pieces, black's king ended up in an open and defenseless position. Nice job exploiting the advantage, though you should take more care with pieces that are attacked (like the Nf3) and consider bringing more troops to the front.
 
Back
Top Bottom