Should dicttors be in civ4?

should dictors be in civ4?

  • yes

    Votes: 66 94.3%
  • no

    Votes: 4 5.7%

  • Total voters
    70

kristopherb

Protective/Charismatic
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
2,220
Location
British Empire Soul:Tesco
Should dictators be in civ4?

Yes because the world history is filled with minor points.
 
haha, i think u mean dictators. and no, i dont think they shouldnt be in the game because theyre dictators, but because dictators usually arent great leaders.
 
You could claim that dictators are in Civ 4 already, as only Roosevelt and Churchill were really voted in democratically.
 
Exactly, we wouldn't have many historical leaders in the game if dictators weren't allowed. I also don't think morality is a criteria that's relevant when putting leaders in the game.
 
What do you mean exactly? Are you asking if dictators already in game should be there (Eg. Stalin, Roman leaders, etc, etc), removed or have you missed the point that they're already there?

"Dictator was the title of a magistrate in ancient Rome appointed by the Senate to rule the state in times of emergency. In modern usage, it refers to an absolutist or autocratic ruler who assumes sole power over the state (though the term is normally not applied to an absolute monarch; see also Oliver Cromwell)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator


However, i did not find find anything with search "dicttor", so maybe i didnt get it :D.
 
Doesn't the human player act as a dictator already, with total control? And the one time there was a limit on the player's power, when you had a democracy in civ2, it was annoying.
 
Already in. Other than despotism and police state, Stalin and Mao is in the game. And that's only including modern police-state dictators, rather than despotic monarchs and emperors.
 
Portuguese said:
What is Stalin?!?
Josef Stalin was one of the founding members of the Communist Party of Russia, and after Lenin's death expanded his influence to gain essentially unquestioned power. He then turned the Soviet Union into the totalarian regime history knows today.
 
In response to whoever said no dictators. Why should we only put leaders who did good things in this game?

History is full of bad leaders and dictators so it would be silly to only put in democratically elected leaders.

I really hope those people see the silliness of saying no dictators.
 
Did someone actually manage to decode what this poll is supposed to be about? I still haven't figured that out.

whould you like dictators in the game even someone who can decode a fridge packet can do it
 
No.

Please pick appropriate choice

A) You are asking if we want to have dictators in game, WHICH WE ALREADY DO HAVE - as pointed out numerous times in this thread.

B) You are trying try find out, if the dictators ALREADY in the GAME should be REMOVED.

C) You are asking if DICTATORS should be ADDED to game, and in this case you DON'T REALIZE that they are ALREADY IN THE GAME.

D) You are asking if MORE DICTATORS should be ADDED to game.

E) Don't have a clue

Please, please, try to stick with only one choice.
 
No.

Please pick appropriate choice

A) You are asking if we want to have dictators in game, WHICH WE ALREADY DO HAVE - as pointed out numerous times in this thread.

B) You are trying try find out, if the dictators ALREADY in the GAME should be REMOVED.

C) You are asking if DICTATORS should be ADDED to game, and in this case you DON'T REALIZE that they are ALREADY IN THE GAME.

D) You are asking if MORE DICTATORS should be ADDED to game.

E) Don't have a clue

Please, please, try to stick with only one choice.

d)
"dude looks like lady"
 
kristopherb, your spelling/grammar/punctuation/posts make my head hurt.
 
Back
Top Bottom