Should it be called Civilization V?

[DripInc.]

I've seen a lot of talk lately that people say there have been so many changes to CiV since Civilization IV that t shouldn't even carry the name anymore. What do you think?

 

[DarkMaster]

Yes. Stop making threads like this people, please.

 

[Moss]

Moderator Action: Thread closed - no proper, new point of discussion is mentioned in the OP. I also fear a very nonconstructive discussion going onward if this thread were allowed to stay open. If you wish to discuss the merits of Civ V, please do so in the corresponding thread that most likely already exists or start a new thread that examines a particular point of Civ V that you like or dislike. Thanks.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889