Should our students be required to learn more than just one foreign language?

The way it is currently set up, its very rare that students in American schools will become fluent in their language. If foriegn languages are to be taugt it should start at an earlier age, because it is much easier for younger kids to learn a new language than adults. Just my 2 cents.

P.S. Sorry for any bad spelling operating on less than 4 hours of sleep.
 
I speak Swedish, Finnish, English and a little German. I like being bilingual, but it wasn't always easy.

Isn't that quatrilingual? Or tetralingual? Or maybe trilingual is "a little German" doesn't count?

EDIT: 900th Post!!!
 
In Canada we have to learn our 2nd official language. We get about an hour of it every day or so.
I hated French class as a kid because we had such bad teachers. I swear most of them were teaching the subject since no one else in the school was fluent and because they could’nt teach anything else.

That being said you can’t work for the government unless you know both official languages. (Well you could but I doubt you’d be doing anything other then sweeping the floors.)

If I ever lean French I’ll try my hand at Spanish so I can go just about anyplace in the Americas and be coherent.
 
Syterion said:
Isn't that quatrilingual? Or tetralingual? Or maybe trilingual is "a little German" doesn't count?

ranking goes like this:

bilingual: two languages
trilingual: three languages
polyglott: 4 or more languages
 
stratego said:
Should our students be required to learn more than just one foreign language?
Why not make sure that they could teach ONE language correctly (some cases, even English) before worrying about adding another foreign language to there. Eleven years of Spanish in my public schools and all I know is from what my friend from Argentina has taught me.
 
The Yankee said:
Why not make sure that they could teach ONE language correctly (some cases, even English) before worrying about adding another foreign language to there. Eleven years of Spanish in my public schools and all I know is from what my friend from Argentina has taught me.

Depends on the quality of the teacher and the will of the students. I received lessons for approximately 10 years in English, 6 years in French and 4 years in Spanish, but still I'm fluent in all three (though I could improve my Spanish and French grammar and vocabulary).

German lessons for 12 years, but the only mistakes I make are typos (and due to the change in spelling about 5 years ago).
 
Yes, but it seems those kinds of experiences are increasingly rare, and it also depends on public or private, or what area, etc. I'm just talking about standard NYC public schools through the years, that were fairly well funded and with above average students, so on...can't imagine there to be very many that manage to do the job well, at least in this city.

That and just having 40 minutes a day devoted only to...Spanish, say, isn't going to get the job done, especially when there are gaps like....oh...let's say, summer.
 
I think language in schools is useless except as a tool for stimulating interest in them. I took 3 years of intensive college Spanish courses, four if you count one year in high school, but they only taught me enough to be able to understand the spoken and written language, and to speak very limited and badly accented amounts. I only became truly proficient when I spent a semester in Spain. To learn a language, you need real-world experience in non-academic settings.
 
BassDude726 said:
To learn a language, you need real-world experience in non-academic settings.

Definitely, but you wouldn't want to learn a language you'll never use anyway.
 
BassDude726 said:
To learn a language, you need real-world experience in non-academic settings.
This is right, but before being confronted to the real-world experience, few years of school or college courses provided to a student WILLING TO LEARN, will make a real difference.
 
Syterion said:
Isn't that quatrilingual? Or tetralingual? Or maybe trilingual is "a little German" doesn't count?

I never actually speak English so I dont consider myself an English-speaker.
 
Last edited:
That is very true. However, the problem JMK, is that in many foreign language classes there is little discussion time. I have completed two years of high school French and can read and write it in the imperfect, the past, the present, the near future, and future tense but cannot speak it very well, if at all (as I learned in France last summer). I don't know if it is the same in all foreign language classes in the US but in mine, we never had a single day where the teacher said "today, we will only speak French, not a word of English". If we had done days like that, I'm confident I could have learned to speak the language to an extent. However, we didn't even learn that in casual conversation in France, people say "je parle pas anglais", not "je ne parle pas anglais". That real-world experience is necessary but prior to it, in the academic setting, there must be discussion in that language to make oneself familiar with the language. Otherwise, you will find yourself able to read street signs but unable to talk to people.
 
Back
Top Bottom