So how exactly did Firefly get itself canceled?

It didn't have that many viewers because it was in a time slot right after a sports game, also the fact that the pilot and the first episode were shown in reverse order confused some people. Since it was in that time slot sometimes you'd miss 15 minutes of the shown due to overtime...

This is basically true. But there's more to it than that.

Fox screwed up. They took a show that would most likely have had a solid, but smallish, loyal audience and they did not support it to the needs of that audience. The audience was probably never going to be large. Whedon shows just don't have that appeal to large audiences. Then Fox interfered with the creative process too much. Which further narrowed the show's appeal. Beyond that, they supported the show extremely badly, showing it out of order, putting it in a time slot where many of the likely viewers would not be at home, and beginning the show when it would be interrupted by baseball.

The mistake Whedon made was to have his show on Fox at all. In that time period, Fox simply had no patience for scifi/fantasy/quirky shows. They were very unlikely to give the show time to find its nitch.

I don't have the sources to prove it, but there was a lot of discussion a few years ago that the business model Fox, and much of Hollywood, uses for which shows to create, continue, and cancel (movies as well) is deeply flawed. And while I've since lost the sources that people were using to make those arguments, it seems to make a lot of sense. For one thing, as the market was becoming more globalized and fractured, the analysis of movies and shows was based only on US income. So much of the potential income stream didn't go into the calculations.
 
After hearing Neil Patrick Harris sing "Laundry Day", I decided I wanted to experience more of Joss Whedon's work -- and saw a few episodes of Firefly online. I then bought a set of the DVDs and the movie. I've watched them four times since the early summer. (I've only seen the movie twice, though. It's sadder than the usual ("Can we get back to the part where Jane was beaten up by a 98 pound girl?" Firefly fare.)

Firefly is...stellar.
 
I've always been more of an Angel fan... though Firefly was certainly good. Adam Baldwin and Nathan Fillion were particularly excellent.
 
Personally, I am eternally grateful to Fox for demanding a "space hooker".

To be fair, Fox does not do everything wrong. And not everything wrong is their fault. But they are very inconsistent on the things they do right and wrong. Which makes planning a pain in the butt.
 
I recently bought the Firefly DVD box set for £10 on Amazon and it arrived about a week ago. I never watched it before and what I heard about it seemed like it was either rubbish or the American equivalent of Red Dwarf. After watching it I can see why it's compared to Red Dwarf.
 
Firefly and Space: Above and Beyond...RIP :( I will never get why great shows get canceled. Oh, and The Brotherhood of Poland, New Hampshire!!

Classical Hero, I urge you to rent and re-watch the entire Firefly series.

Can Dark Angel be considered Sci-Fi? To be honest this genre is not one that I am particularly all that fond of myself.
 
Red Dwarf is a comedy and I suspect he is implying Firefly is a joke
 
Can Dark Angel be considered Sci-Fi? To be honest this genre is not one that I am particularly all that fond of myself.

:yup: It certainly was. But it was near future stuff rather that further future.

Sci-fi is often used for a catch-all phrase that includes things that are not literally sci-fi. But Dark Angel is literally sci-fi. Max was a genetically engineered super-soldier.
 
Back
Top Bottom