Apologies if this is in the wrong section, had no idea where to post this
Three or four years ago, a friend of mine mentioned a game called 'Civilization' when I told him how good I was at playing Age of Empires, an unfortunate time when I was in love with RTS games. While at Virgin Megastore yesterday, I noticed Civilization V. I knew very little about the game, but it was quite publicized around the time of it's release so I decided to give it a go.
At first I had no idea what to do, but eventually got the hang of it. Started with England and then Greece, just messing around, testing how the game works, and I quite liked it. Then I started as India with the aim to play the game properly. After entering the Classical period (or Classic, can't remember what it's called), I had an amazing economy and one of the best armies in the game. I was at war, with Napoleon, against the Persians and it was all going well. Then my game froze.
So I checked online to see whether it was a simple fault of my laptop's or a problem the game was having. After reading quite a few reviews of the game (mainly on the Facebook page) I was shocked to find out the low opinion many people have of the game. I mean, it's fair enough that some people might find the AI very easy, I'm not really in a position to question it, and it is quite weird that religion doesn't really play a part in the game, but I just wanted to know what is really wrong with it?
I find it quite addicting (even more so than Football Manager 2011) although it is a huge pain picking what civilization to be.
As mentioned above, sorry if this is in the wrong section of the forum, thought this was the only place to post this.
Three or four years ago, a friend of mine mentioned a game called 'Civilization' when I told him how good I was at playing Age of Empires, an unfortunate time when I was in love with RTS games. While at Virgin Megastore yesterday, I noticed Civilization V. I knew very little about the game, but it was quite publicized around the time of it's release so I decided to give it a go.
At first I had no idea what to do, but eventually got the hang of it. Started with England and then Greece, just messing around, testing how the game works, and I quite liked it. Then I started as India with the aim to play the game properly. After entering the Classical period (or Classic, can't remember what it's called), I had an amazing economy and one of the best armies in the game. I was at war, with Napoleon, against the Persians and it was all going well. Then my game froze.
So I checked online to see whether it was a simple fault of my laptop's or a problem the game was having. After reading quite a few reviews of the game (mainly on the Facebook page) I was shocked to find out the low opinion many people have of the game. I mean, it's fair enough that some people might find the AI very easy, I'm not really in a position to question it, and it is quite weird that religion doesn't really play a part in the game, but I just wanted to know what is really wrong with it?
I find it quite addicting (even more so than Football Manager 2011) although it is a huge pain picking what civilization to be.
As mentioned above, sorry if this is in the wrong section of the forum, thought this was the only place to post this.