Dann
Green bug
Yes. In the 3 northeast provinces.The Last Conformist said:Does anyone speak Manchu these days?
Some even still know which banner their ancestors belonged to.
Yes. In the 3 northeast provinces.The Last Conformist said:Does anyone speak Manchu these days?
We cannot destroy a language by force. That has been tested with Canadian French speakers (Acadians, Quebec), it has been tested in the Soviet Union (Chechnyans, Kirghizis, Uzbekhs, Kazakhs, etc...) and it has never been successful.Yom said:Nah. France is hardly bilingual (Occitan) and much has been done to protect the French language (l'Académie française) and destroy the other languages in France (e.g. Occitan after the Revolution).
That can't be bad though.Gladi said:We are bilingual , the people in Brno have a very special variety of German .
What about the Netherlands ?Stapel said:Switzerland!
Belgium......
I would be really surprised if it still exists in 25 years. Quite serious on that! The only problem is Brussel / The Brussel Region.
Well, it could be a good idea if there weren't two main issues. First, Wallons don't want to become independent from Flanders (most considers "Wallonia" as an independent state as meaningless). Second, what would Brussels become in case of a split ? 90% of people in Brussels speak French but the city is located in the Flanders. That's a tricky issue.kronic said:That can't be bad though.
As for Belgium: I'm following the developments quite closely but I wonder if it would really be a good idea to create two small states. I also wonder what it would mean for the EU.
Flemish people don't want to join their Northern neighbour. People living in Brussels would never accept to be annexed by Flanders having Antwerp as capital city.Hakim said:It sounds like a good idea to offically divide Belgium in two parts where the northern part joins The Netherlands while the south join France. It's an opportunity for all involved. Brussels goes to the highest bidder.
In that case, if Brussels would be Flemish after succession, it would also be the capital.Marla_Singer said:Flemish people don't want to join their Northern neighbour. People living in Brussels would never accept to be annexed by Flanders having Antwerp as capital city.
It's a matter of democracy. You may accept it or not, but if a large part of Belgian people think differently than you, you have to accept this as it is. Of course if the majority of Flemish people would like better to form their own country, there's no reason for them to not become independent.SonicX said:In that case, if Brussels would be Flemish after succession, it would also be the capital.
There are more people however who'd like to make Brussels into a Brussels DC, a small independant capital state for Europe. I also rather back that idea.
But for those who believe a split is bad, then you have no idea about what's going on. Not having to spend 11 billion euro's a year on a basket case region that's unwilling to free it's market and invest in the future would be great... it would drastically boost our economy would is needed in a time like this.
Flanders has a future alone ... alone, it is a rich as Switzerland.
Wallonie should be annexed by France though, perhaps the French are more willing to pay for a stubborn child who won't grow up.
sysyphus said:Why would that be funny?
Flemmish is the same as Dutch. At best it is a dialect.Marla_Singer said:What about the Netherlands ?
People talk Dutch, Flemish, Frisian over there.
Of course Dutch tends to outclass all other languages, but still, the Netherlands have never done anything against its minorities languages.
Marla_Singer said:It's a matter of democracy. You may accept it or not, but if a large part of Belgian people think differently than you, you have to accept this as it is. Of course if the majority of Flemish people would like better to form their own country, there's no reason for them to not become independent.
However, I must say that I don't like at all people talking in such a way. You're flaming for nothing.
Xen said:primarilly because its canada and belgium
you guy's are neither.sysyphus said:Canada and Belgium are not funny, we are witty.
As I use to say, Belgium are the bits that are so messed up that neither the NL nor France wanted it.Stapel said:Belgium doesn't make sene, Marla.
There is close to nothing that links the Flemmish to the Walloons.
Do want to make me angry or somethingThe Last Conformist said:As I use to say, Belgium are the bits that are so messed up that neither the NL nor France wanted it.
Yes. I would have thought that obvious.SonicX said:Do want to make me angry or something