Suggest a new leader for Civ 6

^ Doesn't Civ4 have Kublai Khan as well as Genghis?

Ahuizotl: Another badass Aztec emperor, crushed everyone, expanded and consolidated the empire, left it in the best place he could before Monty II reaped the benefits.

I totally thought someone already suggested Ahuizotl until I realized they actually suggested Atotoztli ;)

FWIW, I think Civ5 used Monty I, not Monty II.
 
Well, beside of Maurya, Gupta, Mughals, Maratha, Delhi Sultanate, Mysore, Vijayanagar, Pala, Chola and maybe Sri Lanka civ. I can't see why there should be more than one Indian civ. :D

China can be problematic as they are technically one state ruled by different dynasty for most part of the history (besides several periods of their history when there are dozen of independent kings)

I always thought it would be pretty cool to change leaders with every age. Add a new bonus to your empire, include more leaders and represent all periods of an empires history.

Did some say Phoenicia and Carthage on one game?!? :0
 
Hey, Xen is here. I thought I tried to pick the right one with Basil II. I figured you'd want someone other than Justinian or Theodora.



Added P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus.

Basil is a great one!

By and large almost anyone other then Theodora or Justinian would be nice. (For onlookers: They aren't really Byzantines IMO- Byzantium only grows into a distinct entity after reign of Heraclius and his reforms making Greek the language of government. That's the point of no return in terms of cultural evolution from E. Roman into something different.)

I happen to love Nikephorus though, but I also think its high time we lived in a world that had "Conan" (or as close as wel can come to it) as a leader in civ. ;)
 
There are quite a few leaders that I'd love to see.

Rome: Hadrian, Diocletian, Cicero or Cornelius Sulla
Greece: Attalus I Soter
England: Edward I
Germany: Frederic I Barbarossa or Emperor Frederic II
Russia: Alexander II
France: Philippe II Auguste
Persia: Shapur II the Great
 
First thing let me clear something.... There were not different civilizations in India except after Islamic conquest of India since they bought Arabic and Persian influence .... so it can be said that Delhi sultanate and Mughals were kind of different but only in religion as Islam was state religion then... But overall all the empires not civilizations were same. We Indians speak different language but our culture is almost similar with little variations . Second thing ... I accept Gandhi should not lead India - It should be either Ashok , Chandragupta II or Akbar...
 
Japan: Meiji
(Republican) Rome: Cicero
England: Edward I. (Though Alfred the Great sounds neat, anglo-saxon England differs too much from post-conquest England, imo)
Germany: Wilhelm I. (Same problem as with England actually, I'd take Frederick the Great at best as the earliest for a modern Germany, leaving out any Emperors of the HRE)

Uuuh, that's all I can think of right now, maybe more later.
 
Tibet - The Dalai Lama

Romania/Hungary - Dracula
 
England: Alfred
This man basically saved England from being a Danish colony. He established an effective system of defense and the English navy and codified the laws of the kingdom.

Poland: Jan III Sobieski
Dunno so much about him. He kicked some ass in the siege of Vienna
.

Yeah he did, he and his Husaria (Winged Hussars) attacked the totally surprised Ottoman hordes during their siege of Vienna in 1683 and ran them to the ground, thus making sure the Ottoman empire did not advance further into western Europe.
Although, if you ask the Austrians, they will deny the Poles came to their rescue and saved their beloved capital. They did in turn, in not very distant future, organize Poland's partitions (together with Prussia and Russia) as a thank you.
 
Art Grin, those are some good choices! My only thing is that while Frederick II of the HRE was super awesome and I'd love him in a Civ game, he didn't excercise much control over, or care that much about Germany. If they had a Sicilian, or a pan-Italian civ, he'd be my first pick!
 
Ivan may not be perfect but I think he would be very interesting as a civ leader, I don't see any reason why they should stick with Catherine for Civ VI, or Elizabeth for England.

IVAN the terrible de facto created the Russian Empire, he expanded it eastward, captured Kazan (Khazan) and further east into Siberia.
He organized the army, defeated countless Tartar (and other) tribes dominating to this point the vast landmass east of Moscow.
He was a despot and a fanatic Orthodox Christian at the same time.
Ruthless, Imperialistic, Spiritual, Militarily-Scientific.
He created the infamous Oprichniki, being psychotic about spies ordered countless innocent people tortured and murdered, then would try and repent by mutilating himself.
A truly incredibly interesting character and a great Great Leader pick.
BY THE WAY, I'VE SUGGESTED HIM BEING ONE OF THE GREAT LEADERS OF RUSSIA SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE IN THE IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS FORUM.
but hey, nobody cares what daft writes, until others re-discover it later and take the credit for themselves, cool.

Cuauhtemoc for Azteca.

Cetswhayo for Zulu

William (the conqueror) for Normandy (France)

Tamerlane (Timur) and his Timurid Empire

Native America: Tecumseh, Geronimo

Iroquois: Dekanawida

Sioux: Crazy Horse

England: Oliver Cromwell

Russia: Nicholas II

Rome: Hadrian, Marcus Aurelius, Octavian, Claudius

Vikings (Norse/Norway): Harald Hardrada

Greece: Agamemnon, Pericles (of Athens)

Egypt: Akhenaten

Basil is a great one!

By and large almost anyone other then Theodora or Justinian would be nice. (For onlookers: They aren't really Byzantines IMO- Byzantium only grows into a distinct entity after reign of Heraclius and his reforms making Greek the language of government. That's the point of no return in terms of cultural evolution from E. Roman into something different.)

I happen to love Nikephorus though, but I also think its high time we lived in a world that had "Conan" (or as close as wel can come to it) as a leader in civ. ;)

Conan was/is a Celtic mythical hero, no?
so, you never know.
 
IVAN the terrible de facto created the Russian Empire, he expanded it eastward, captured Kazan (Khazan) and further east into Siberia.
He organized the army, defeated countless Tartar (and other) tribes dominating to this point the vast landmass east of Moscow.
He was a despot and a fanatic Orthodox Christian at the same time.
Ruthless, Imperialistic, Spiritual, Militarily-Scientific.
He created the infamous Oprichniki, being psychotic about spies ordered countless innocent people tortured and murdered, then would try and repent by mutilating himself.
A truly incredibly interesting character and a great Great Leader pick.
BY THE WAY, I'VE SUGGESTED HIM BEING ONE OF THE GREAT LEADERS OF RUSSIA SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE IN THE IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS FORUM.
but hey, nobody cares what daft writes, until others re-discover it later and take the credit for themselves, cool.
I'm not trying to rip you off or anything, I don't go in the ideas and suggestions I don't really give to the Civ community :lol:.
but I agree that Ivan is great (terrible), Russia is always one of my favorite civs and I didn't really want to see Catherine, and Peter II was already in Civ IV. plus Ivan is really awesome (Terrible)

it seems by your post number that you've written a lot, but I assure you I'm not stealing Ideas. :cool:
Vikings (Norse/Norway): Harald Hardrada
He would awesome, and, if I'm not mistaken they always have a different leader for the Vikings/Scandinavia.
 
Moderator Action: Moved to Ideas & Suggestions
 
The Belgians - King Albert I of Belgium
Why not? The Belgians haven't made appearance outside DLC as far as I know. The Belgians participated in the industrial revolution, winning entry in the imperialist empires club in Africa.
King Albert I was an interesting man. Reported as fighting alongside his men in WWI, with his family also in other supporting on field roles. He was also a major force in expanding democracy in Belgium at the time.
...and lets not forget the most important contribution to history of all: pioneering in the fields of chocolate and waffle making!
 
Art Grin, those are some good choices! My only thing is that while Frederick II of the HRE was super awesome and I'd love him in a Civ game, he didn't excercise much control over, or care that much about Germany. If they had a Sicilian, or a pan-Italian civ, he'd be my first pick!

Frederick II (the great) of PRUSSIA, one of the top Great Leaders of all time (definitely top 100).
Should 100% be included and lead his country of PRUSSIA, not Germany, in CVI
 
Frederick II (the great) of PRUSSIA, one of the top Great Leaders of all time (definitely top 100).
Should 100% be included and lead his country of PRUSSIA, not Germany, in CVI

Yeah, I'd love to see Frederick II of Prussia in the game too. I find him more fun than Bismarck.
 
Back
Top Bottom