Systems of government -- definitions

Originally posted by sumthinelse
many citizens of of non-US countries seem to believe that they have a vested interest in US politics. Why?
Because they're jealous. Duh :rolleyes:

Originally posted by sumthinelse
And from the other point of view, some in the Middle East feel that the US feels too free to bomb other counties. We should consider this point of view.
We should? Only because someone holds a point of view doesn't make it valid or worth considering.

Originally posted by sumthinelse
Is it OK for the US to bomb weaker nations, but not OK for anyone to bomb the US?
Okay... uhm... as far as I know, every bombing ever has had some sort of reason attached to it. Its the validity of the reasoning that merits examining, not the concept of 'is bombing okay'.

Originally posted by sumthinelse
Note, however, that this question would apply to Clinton, GW Bush, and Al Gore. The results of a presidential election would not really change this aspect of US foriegn policy.
Well then there ya go. Mind your own business :D
 
Originally posted by Greadius


We should? Only because someone holds a point of view doesn't make it valid or worth considering.

Okay... uhm... as far as I know, every bombing ever has had some sort of reason attached to it. Its the validity of the reasoning that merits examining, not the concept of 'is bombing okay'.


I don't mean to say that the bombing of weaker countries is a simple matter; I think it's not always right or wrong in itself.

I think you would agree with this: you have to consider something at least once to determine if it is or is not valid. I think we should consider the question of bombing very carefully. Maybe 3 or 4 times. But I think any US president would have taken some military action after 9/11.

Anyway, the US voters would not elect a president who refused to take military action after 9/11. I am saying that non-US citizens who think a US presidential election is going to solve all their problems are looking at the wrong goverment.

Maybe like the guy who is having problems with his wife at home and goes to a bar to talk about somebody else's marriage? It's as good a way to escape reality as any.
 
Originally posted by sumthinelse


Yes. Most US citizens I know don't think that elections in Europe will affect their domestic well-being, but many citizens of of non-US countries seem to believe that they have a vested interest in US politics. Why?

We have a vested interest in US politics because the US interferes with everyone else! Surely, September 11 got one thing across to you, that everyone likes the US meddling in their countries affairs. You look at every country who has issues with America and there's something behind it. To say that the destruction of the world trade center was an unprovoked attack is naive. You reap what you sow.
 
Originally posted by bobgote


We have a vested interest in US politics because the US interferes with everyone else! Surely, September 11 got one thing across to you, that everyone likes the US meddling in their countries affairs. You look at every country who has issues with America and there's something behind it. To say that the destruction of the world trade center was an unprovoked attack is naive. You reap what you sow.

I'm getting sick of your anti-American racism, bobgote. You're seriously saying that Americans deserve September 11th? The only thing that makes people around the world hate America is their cultural inferiority complex.
I suppose that this is understandable from an Australian point of view. After all, they have no real nation and are simply badly educated Englishmen living in a warmer country! :lol:
 
Originally posted by bobgote
We have a vested interest in US politics because the US interferes with everyone else!
When is the last time the U.S. has interfered with Australian politics?

Originally posted by bobgote
You look at every country who has issues with America and there's something behind it.
Neurosis. Grievences can exist, but they never justify terrorism (per the traditionally, pre-sept.11 definition).

Originally posted by bobgote
To say that the destruction of the world trade center was an unprovoked attack is naive. You reap what you sow.
It was an unprovoked attack. I challenge you to find a single individual in the WTC who helped purprotrate the imagined grievences of the hijackers or their backers. A single one to make up for the thousands of people who died who couldn't find Saudi Arabia on a map and had only heard of Islam in passing. They didn't sow anything.
To say their murder is politically justified in inhumane. I hope the people charged with the responsibility of protecting your life aren't as eager to dismiss its validity.
 
Originally posted by Parsifal


I'm getting sick of your anti-American racism, bobgote. You're seriously saying that Americans deserve September 11th? The only thing that makes people around the world hate America is their cultural inferiority complex.
I suppose that this is understandable from an Australian point of view. After all, they have no real nation and are simply badly educated Englishmen living in a warmer country! :lol:

hi parsifal! :) how ya goin?

also, i may be a bit fired up on the topic, but it's something i feel quite strongly about. We had a doco on tv over here where they took a couple of Americans to Iran, where US foreign policy had quite an effect. Believe it or not, Iran had a democratic party who were looking like getting elected. This however was not in US interests since this party didn't want to give it's oil away at quite the rate that was going. The leader ended up getting assassinated. Well at least the US has cheap oil.

The Americans they took over there found out that there is another side to the story, and said that they heard none of this back home and that they realised it was not as simple as it had been presented to be.

Also America doesn't really have culture, well, a good one in any case. You may have power but on culture you are in the red.

Also your comments on Australia - we have a better nation than you'll ever have. Our government may be s***ty US Buttkissers (to borrow a term) but our people are the worlds best :) And we're not so badly educated. And we also have a great accent!! BTW, Why do americans like steve erwin?
 
Originally posted by bobgote


To say that the destruction of the world trade center was an unprovoked attack is naive. You reap what you sow.

This thread is getting close to a flame war. Thanks a lot, Bob, for dragging this discussion into a s*** throwing contest. Mods?
 
Originally posted by sumthinelse


This thread is getting close to a flame war. Thanks a lot, Bob, for dragging this discussion into a s*** throwing contest. Mods?

Looks like you missed my last message. I can understand that it may still be raw nerves for some, but when you look at it from outside, things are clearer. Also, I wasn't the one who started it on Sept. 11. Apologies for any damage caused.

Also, i think it's amusing when an off-topic thread goes even further off topic. :)
 
Originally posted by sumthinelse


This thread is getting close to a flame war. Thanks a lot, Bob, for dragging this discussion into a s*** throwing contest. Mods?

Looks like you missed my last message. I can understand that it may still be raw nerves for some, but when you look at it from outside, things are clearer. Also, I wasn't the one who started it on Sept. 11. Apologies for any damage caused.

Also, i think it's amusing when an off-topic thread goes even further off topic. :)
To Greadius:
It's not stuff that's been done against australia. There's not much of that, and not serious either. But unlike some (it seems), I can look at where other nations are coming from.
And Sept11 was an act of terror/war call it what you will, it was not aimed at individuals but was meant to send a message to the government.

(edit) sorry for double post, unintentional
 
Only an imbecile would say that 9/11 was justified in any way.

bobgote

Australia is a fine country, and a US ally, but your not "better" or have a "better culture" then the US.

If I see ONE MORE derogatory comment about the US or any other nation from you, you are gone for a week.

Ignore this warning at your peril.

Everyone else

Keep things civil people, this was an upscale thread, keep it that way, or....
:slay:
 
I'll say no more on the topic. Apologies to all I may have offended. I'll take no more part in this thread. It fires me up too much.
 
It is amazing how off topic this thread has gotten. :rolleyes: But I'll feed the fire a bit.[plasma]

While we're on 9-11, and as an American, we expected nothing less than some sort of military response from our government. I was angry and wanted Bin Laden's head on a stick (and still do). :arrow: I did cringe when we went into Afganistan. I was and still am seeing this thing drag out for a much longer time than we as the public were led to believe. The Soviets were there for 10 years.

I didn't like the Taliban. They were very repressive, but they had made in USA stamped all over them. We supported them as the mujadeen (sp?) against the Soviet occupation, not because of what or who they were, but because they were anti-Soviet. No good deed goes unpunished. They forced the Soviets to withdraw then turn around and allow Al Qaida to base there against the US.

The country is in disarray, and will take time. We helped the northern alliance get rid of their repressors. They were happy. But again, no good deed goes unpunished. We are now being criticized for not helping stabilize the new government. Now the factions will have to sort it out.

Another example is Iran. A former co-worker and I were discussing this years ago. He was from Iran. He left in 1978. The struggle there was between the Mullahs and the secular faction. In 1953 we supported the Shah, the British supported Khomeini. The Shah was a good friend of the US, but was repressive of the religious faction. He said that Khomeini had made in Great Britain stamped all over him. Well I did find it interesting that during the hostage crisis in 1979, Khomeini's faction wouldn't talk to the US, but would talk to British and Canadian negotiators.

We're angry about 9-11, but at the same time we do need to look at our policies abroad. I'm not saying we brought it on ourselves. No government policy justifies the slaughter of innocent civilians.

We depend a lot on foreign oil. I suspect that Saddam Hussein is still in power because we're getting a sweetheart deal on oil from Iraq because of the terms of surrender, whereas we might not from the Shias and Kurds we should have supported when Hussein brutally put down their insurgence after the Gulf War. Of course we didn't want to see another Islamic Republic in the Persian Gulf. But once Hussein is overthrown, we'll of course pay for that error. People have long memories about events.

It's very difficult being a powerful nation. Civ 3 did set it up so that when you are the most powerful nation in the world, everyone is annoyed with you for no apparent reason. But when you're not, everyone tends to be polite. A parallel in the real world is that it isn't cultural envy, it's power envy.
 
I would like tell something to everyone who are still happy about the 9/11.

I saw the incident live on the tv and, on the moment and during a few weeks, I was happy of that. I can be qualify as a anti-american. In fact, I'm anti-american to the same degree of msharpe as an anti-communism and before the 9/11, I was more extreme than that. But now I've changed. Bobgote would you have write the same things if one of your dearest friend have die in the attack? If the same thing happen in Montréal I probably react like most of the americans. The attack was aimed at civilian and none of them deserve it. We can argue that american do the same thing (kill civilians when attacking another country) but that don't justify another similar act.



Originally posted by bobgote


And Sept11 was an act of terror/war call it what you will, it was not aimed at individuals but was meant to send a message to the government.



Your wrong here. In many of his messages, Ben Laden say that any american who pay his taxes is an enemy.


p.s.: sorry for my english
 
"Your wrong here. In many of his messages, Ben Laden say that any american who pay his taxes is an enemy. "
Is he supporting tax dodgers, can this man be more evil?
 
Originally posted by tomberry
I would like tell something to everyone who are still happy about the 9/11.

I saw the incident live on the tv and, on the moment and during a few weeks, I was happy of that.

Anybody that makes a statement like that deserves to have been on one of the American Airlines planes. You make me sick :mad:
 
Originally posted by rmsharpe


Anybody that makes a statement like that deserves to have been on one of the American Airlines planes. You make me sick :mad:

Did you read his whole post? He since realized he was wrong. That does count for something.
 
There is a definite power envy thing around the world. We Americans do have to realize we're not the most liked nation. People are going to have varying responses on first hearing such news as 9-11, but only will realize the horror after seeing it. It presents a first-hand view of "you could be next."

9-11 was a surreal morning. I couldn't believe it actually happened, and it took several viewings, especially the ones from home video cams before the reality really set in. How could the United States suffer such a horror? Who was behind it? Someone wanted to hurt the economy hard. But why innocent civilians?

Give me Bin Laden's head on a stick. But that won't stop Al Qaida or any other terrorist organization. Anyone who thinks that is a fool.

Unlike what GWB said in his address to congress and the nation, "They hate our freedoms...," I think they hate our power, both economic and military.

The thing that is most scary right now is that many Americans are willing to give up some freedoms in exchange for security. Under current FBI guidelines, if you visit a terrorist web site just for the sake of doing research and learning more about them just for curiosity, your visit gets flagged to the FBI on the Carnivore program. You will then be subject to investigation.

Ben Franklin once said, "Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither." We can't allow our freedoms to shrink, yet we need to change the way our law enforcement agencies do business and allow them greater investegatory latitude. I still worry about the knee jerk approach Ashcroft has been taking. Conservatives are also worried. I've heard commentators Rush, Mehdved, George Will, William Safire, and conservative professors of constitutional law worry about this. So it isn't just us liberals who are concerned. There has to be a balance.
 
Originally posted by Trinity
Unlike what GWB said in his address to congress and the nation, "They hate our freedoms...," I think they hate our power, both economic and military.
All three a tied up in a nice, neat, little package. They hate our freedom, they speak about the decedance in our culture with more contenmpt than our military or economy. The type of theocracy they support is more of an antithesis to our personal freedom than our economy or military status.
Not withstanding, it is ignorant to believe any compromise could be drawn in terms of their 'grievances'. They live to destroy; removing targets won't change that.
 
Maybe my english is the reason why rmsharpe don't understand what I mean. Even the moderator get me wrong, I think, because I can no longer post in the forum (and I guess I will be banned again for using another login but I have to reply to this)

If you meet me in person, you won't see a little monster wishing death to the US. I'm a very normal person and I don't deserve to die. I'm not the only one who has that reaction on the 9/11. On tv I saw some public commentary saying the US deserve that after what they did in Vietnam, Korea, etc... It is rare but in many country there is always a couple of person who are so upset about the american imperialism, that when something bad happen to the US they can't be sad. Just as an example: if, in 1960, the same thing happen to the Kremlin what will be the reaction in US? The great majority of the americans will be sad but some the most anti-soviet will laught. Then after a week or 2 they will understand what happen and become like and be sorry for having thinking such a thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom