Nobody
Gangster
Ok lots of questions people, well heres some answers for the first 3. i will answer the others soon.
1.Why has none of you asked for nationalism and espionage in order to make the FA job more meaningful and result oriented. Here I consider MPPs from nationalism and Espionage options as key.
Well I havent really lobbied for any diplomatic technologies as this was the Foreign ministers job and I was not a member of the foreign ministry (I tried to join but I never got a answer). But I think both of these techs are valuable and we should go after them. Mutual protection pacts and trade embargos are very useful tools. And Espionage is a must.
2. Why have none of you advocated for which nations to make as close allies on our continent, and pre-empt war, and why did not you address the MPP offer that came from the Zulus.
I was not the foreign minister this was not my job (it was Donovan Zoi and after he walked out Civgeneral) But I have already advocated in the aid and right of passage threads, that we should work on making a group of friends. I would like nations who we have not gone to war with e.g. France, Russia and America. I can see benefits of MMP with these nations, but I think that is up to the people. I also believe we should give gifts and sign right of passage agreements with most nations of the world to make them polite especially the nations on our continent. If we make friends with our continent they might stop attacking us. If we make the world polite they will not attack us. There for we will not need to pre-empt war.
3. Do you agree to poll the offered peace agreement against the next doctrinal expansion of the war, for example Mpondo and Isandhlwana against your offer?
IF there is war if Zulus, I will not likely take office until one turnchat into the game. So I might not get to make this decision. As far as war is concerned I will poll the people, asking when they want to make peace. But as for what cities to attack, this is up the military department. I will try to not get entangled with the fighting of the war, just signing of the peace. What I mean is it is FA's responsibility to stop wars coming, once the war starts it is FA's responsibility to conclude it. The actually fighting of the war is up to the military department. I am willing to post peace plans against military plans if need for example: When should we make peace with Zuliquiros (fictions nation)? Now, After City A falls, After City A B and C fall, No peace destroy them, Other, Abstain.
1.Why has none of you asked for nationalism and espionage in order to make the FA job more meaningful and result oriented. Here I consider MPPs from nationalism and Espionage options as key.
Well I havent really lobbied for any diplomatic technologies as this was the Foreign ministers job and I was not a member of the foreign ministry (I tried to join but I never got a answer). But I think both of these techs are valuable and we should go after them. Mutual protection pacts and trade embargos are very useful tools. And Espionage is a must.
2. Why have none of you advocated for which nations to make as close allies on our continent, and pre-empt war, and why did not you address the MPP offer that came from the Zulus.
I was not the foreign minister this was not my job (it was Donovan Zoi and after he walked out Civgeneral) But I have already advocated in the aid and right of passage threads, that we should work on making a group of friends. I would like nations who we have not gone to war with e.g. France, Russia and America. I can see benefits of MMP with these nations, but I think that is up to the people. I also believe we should give gifts and sign right of passage agreements with most nations of the world to make them polite especially the nations on our continent. If we make friends with our continent they might stop attacking us. If we make the world polite they will not attack us. There for we will not need to pre-empt war.
3. Do you agree to poll the offered peace agreement against the next doctrinal expansion of the war, for example Mpondo and Isandhlwana against your offer?
IF there is war if Zulus, I will not likely take office until one turnchat into the game. So I might not get to make this decision. As far as war is concerned I will poll the people, asking when they want to make peace. But as for what cities to attack, this is up the military department. I will try to not get entangled with the fighting of the war, just signing of the peace. What I mean is it is FA's responsibility to stop wars coming, once the war starts it is FA's responsibility to conclude it. The actually fighting of the war is up to the military department. I am willing to post peace plans against military plans if need for example: When should we make peace with Zuliquiros (fictions nation)? Now, After City A falls, After City A B and C fall, No peace destroy them, Other, Abstain.