The 9/11 conspiracy/denial debunking kit

IM not sure what your sayin. Thats because your not trying.Is it because I couldn't refute your inside victim statement I was debunked? No. Its because you don't know what your talking about.The video I linked that was show on Fox except for the evidence I brought to question, was never answered or accounted for in any real way. I haven't bothered to clink any of your links. Well. I was told to shut it because they saw it happen, I guess that was another good rebuttle Millions of people saw it. You should shut because every time you open it you get shown to be another truther who doesn't have a clue.

Was I suppose to come on and be the 1st in the world to prove conclusivly without a doubt using a bunch of web pages and opinions that 911 was a insidejob? :lol: No your not the first and you won't be the last. There are plenty of other truthers out there just like you.
Oh Boy, get your head out you ass. When sidetracked I was focused on casting doubt in key areas by making use of real undisputable events co-relating to the certain type of 'debunk' evidence continualy provided agaist me here. Are you sure you know what real and indisputable means? Every bit of you tribe has been disputed.

Thats all one can do without taking a warning. I sure don't take the side against the Gov version of events hoping to make life long friends out of some, or crucial contacts for a job in the USA Gov from others.
Still I feel I did a good job here and thus, having you and other contest this the most is something I will understand.
A good job? The only good job you did was that of making yourself look foolish. And your not taking the side against the gov. version your taking the side against scientists, witnesses, engineers, aviators and a whole slew or other experts who are not the gov. You are on the side of the unreal and imagination based on nothing of substance against logic reason and common sense.
 
Wow IM embarrassed you'd think I would assume so low from so high up. Were now talking cyber geek bored on a Sat night type prank. I hinted if their was Gov co-operation it wouldn't end after the attacks. No if it were true, it would be equally impressive the way they planned an orcastrated explanation of aftermath curiosity's from Internet conspiracy theorists and eventually respected professors. Its logical to concluded if planted info didn't exist then the Inside job wasn't true and thus how easy it is to bebunk and hold on to your belief radiicle Islam was guilty. You'd think right? Well If the 'Aftermath' special op's wern't being outed everywhere it would have be easy enough for me :goodjob:

On top of Coercive agents they ran 'Operation mockingbird' aka Press suppress, They reached to the net with "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories" But lets not pretend nobody in the progressive conspiracy group suggested an explanation for something as small as "A plane disappearing! was needed!

In fact Could be the solution was to let them fight over how it disapeared while its truly secretly gathered up an auctioned off at Babylonian Grove to the highest bidders (sorry was that not concrete enough-striken :mischief:)

Come on, Secretly hiding the wreckage is as outrageous sounding as having it all disappearing when by chance majority of cases indicate plenty to be found at a crash sceane area.
I mean who dictates what has greater odds of occurrence when dealing with the Gov that hires male prostitutes as Press secretary from a Published Pentagon witness? :lol:

Imagine Canada had the same story published in all Newspaper as fact? USA would have a feild day! :)

This "hooker" was also a major Washington blogger under" the New voice of the Media"

So how many Bush connected 'guys' like this weren't outed for posing in "military stud.com" :D Scary its possable some are still out working legit jobs and interacting with established sites or setting up their own "truth" blogs like Gannon. He had info nowone could have(read link).

Its possable 100's of sites are scatterd with privy access to convincing "government taken photos" or deceiving info and that some of this has been googled and found by "loyal' AMericans to link agaist 'disloyal nutjobs' in debunk threads.
...Crazy?!! Well who would had believed they'd let a hooker in the Whitehouse! right? :lol: ..... :sad:

Someone who looked into all the proof against the Gov story wouln't be called off by Bush's famous conspiracy avoidence command. That was just to help disrcredit, not to solely debunk.
No these guys aren't as dumb as you want to believe. In fact I bet they are smart enough to let you think they are this dumb before and after, if they could pull off the smartest tactical move in History. ;) (I mean if it was A infiltrated Gov/Inside Job that is )


So to Conclude the essay lol ... These guys get your taxes so give them some proper credit. If they had done it it would more likely entail covering up on a grand scale. Something like building a plane out of 'straw' and Christening it with the name: "The Unknown" :lol:

Hey How how did this follow me over from last page :confused: Urgh!! Dam I wish I had some blasted formattng n'graamer skills :mad:

Ok but Whatever you say Sadistic it been worthwhile getting involved from my point of veiw. Not sure how you feel it paid off gettin involved ;)



JericoHill said:
Wow TA, you assume I knew Skad's friend was on that plane. I didn't. Can you just drop this whole thread. You're clearly grasping at straws
Jerico Im surprised you took that one, but no, its you who assumes to much. I know you didn't hear about his dramatic testimony till I brought up dramatic evidence regarding the crash site for the first time. That was my point ;)
Im surprised Jerico didnt tell me about your tragic story. He mentioned his eye witness account In other words, He watched your friend perish
Very sad.
It seems Xenocrates here thinks you both like to hit up these threads together but I forget Jerico didn't know about your friend untill I did sorry.
I realize you say you brought this up many times before but Im sure most havn't heard about the memorial proceedings for the Pentigon service
SO Jerico Why do you want to shut it down? Hey Im the one here whos "looking stupid" and I say keep in up! :goodjob:
 
@ T.A. JONES

http://www.rense.com/ <----- this is a Art Bell type site that talks about the NWO and UFO's.

Don't you check your sources before you link them?
 
This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please improve the article by adding references. See the talk page for details. (October 2007)

Wiki ref notes said:
b David Wise and Thomas Ross (1964). Invisible Government.
^ Deborah Davis (1979). Katharine the Great, 137-138.
^ Cord Meyer (1980). Facing Reality: From World Federalism to the CIA, 42-59.
^ Deborah Davis (1979). Katharine the Great, 226.
^ a b Carl Bernstein. "CIA and the Media", Rolling Stone Magazine, 20 October 1977.
^ Nina Burleigh (1998). A Very Private Woman, 118.
^ Evan Thomas (1995). The Very Best Men: The Early Years of the CIA, 33.
^ Alex Constantine (2000). Mockingbird: The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA.
^ a b (1975) Thomas Braden, interview included in the Granada Television program, World in Action: The Rise and Fall of the CIA.
^ John Ranelagh (1986). The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA, 198-202.
^ Evan Thomas (1995). The Very Best Men: The Early Years of the CIA, 98-106.
^ Cord Meyer (1980). Facing Reality: From World Federalism to the CIA, 60-84.
^ Jack Anderson (1979). Confessions of a Muckraker, 208-236.
^ Evan Thomas (1995). The Very Best Men: The Early Years of the CIA, 117.
^ Evan Thomas (1995). The Very Best Men: The Early Years of the CIA, 148-150.
^ Cord Meyer (1980). Facing Reality: From World Federalism to the CIA, 86-89.
^ Evan Thomas (1995). The Very Best Men: The Early Years of the CIA, 330.
^ Thomas Braden. ""I'm Glad the CIA is 'Immoral'", Saturday Evening Post, 20 May 1967.
^ Nina Burleigh (1998). A Very Private Woman, 105.
^ (April, 1976) Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Government Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities, 191-201.
^ Mary Louise (2003). Mockingbird: CIA Media Manipulation.


How bout You follow up all the other "UFO" related references. I'll say Im right, its fact and can't be refuted. You can try to disprove a known fact or better, you can close your eyes and go back to sleep :goodjob:
Goodnight:sleep:
 
Sorry for the bump, but I remembered the debunking kit and the claims that a fire couldn't make a building with a steel frame collapse.

Not too long ago, in a university in Delft, a coffeemachine caused a fire. It spread across the building and this is what happened:

Thema_van_de_Dag__N_239045g.jpg


55763-a.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6VeA6wNYGE&feature=related

If a fire caused by a spark in a coffeemachine can cause a partial collapse in a building this size, imagine what a jetplane full of fuel can do to the structural intergrity. Especially when the mass of half the WTC was pushing down on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom