....uuuggghhhh.... I just found out about her some and came to report, though I found friends have done it for me.......
well, its time to quit the crap fest, and start planning the crusade!
unless... well two out of three terms wouldnt be bad to call off the crusade-
-Big manlly Cataphracts with the Romano-Dark age helmet we all know and love (witha big 'ol crest on top!) is in there for the UU
-they have
sweet traits, not the crappy stuff like seafaring is going to turn out to be, or expansionist, but stuff likle religious/scientific- a dark age babylon more or less
-what is actually least imporatant to me is the leader, though, I would still prefer either heraclius I, or Basil II as the leader, Justinian is okay, but like has been told moe or less, his wife co-ruled with to be honest, and needed the support of each other to have been succesful as they were, if we really want Justians wife, then let her be like she was in real life- a behind the scenes co-ruler (that would be interesting, portraying a couple as the "leader" -it would be leaders then wouldnt it?- instead of just one
if those things(suggestions for accuracy/demands for no crusade) were followed through, the sack of Atari would noty happen at all
)
, there will be leaderhead artwork for the civs in the scenarios, and there will be no cases of "Ghandi represents the Normans", or Ceaser is representing some chick that was a european monarch, and since there are these mini civs, its hard to tell just who will be a civ in full, and who will be a mini civ- which is why there is alway reason to hope that our civ arguments will ahve effect on Atari, as once you get the base head movents down on an animation, all you have to do is change the clothing, and background to change eras
