Top 10 combat rifles

umm dude, the Springfield was an excellent rifle, for its time. It was highly accurate and in competent hands could lay down fire, or be used to pick off the enemy at a good range. The USMC used this rifle for a long time, WW1, WW2 and if im not mistaken there were still some in Korea. So I would say being involved in 2 world wars, a police action and being a bolt action rilfe, it deserves a place on the list. My opinion, but it is a fine rifle.

true, but it was a copy of the mauser.

Maxim gun wouldn't be classified as an assault rifle though, it's a machinegun.

point. i thought the thread was about all guns.
 
I cant say im an expert enough to know if it was a copy or not.

But it still was a great rifle.
 
The '03 resembled the mauser action but it wasn't simply a copy of the mauser like an M48. The superior sights, and the later excellent A3 sights being the main difference.

It was pretty much designed from scratch.
 
yeah except from the action that is an exact copy of t he mauser. and the action is the most important part of the rifle.

actually there was a time when all bolt action rifles were referred to as a "mauser". in europe at least.

the springfield might be a better rifle, just like most bolt actions of today are better rifles than the 98 (89?) mauser, but i still put the mauser higher up.

cause they "invented" that design.
 
I don't really see why assault rifles are in this category. Yes, they share similarities with rifles, but are entirely another class of weapons in my eyes.

That aside, shouldn't you have put the MP-44 on there? As the AK-47 really is a knock-off of that. No matter how much Kalashnikov denies it, it's true. The similarities are too close to be coincidence.
 
I don't really see why assault rifles are in this category. Yes, they share similarities with rifles, but are entirely another class of weapons in my eyes.

They are in the same catagory of individually deployed small-arms. (Combat rifles)

That aside, shouldn't you have put the MP-44 on there? As the AK-47 really is a knock-off of that. No matter how much Kalashnikov denies it, it's true. The similarities are too close to be coincidence.

The AK-47 only resembles the Stg44 in first glance appearance. But the similarity stops there. The AK is a completely different rifle. Kalashnikov's design is more mechanically similar to the M1 Garand than the Stg44.

Kalashnikov is right to get pissed at people accusing him of ripping off the Stg44.

The only thing the Soviets really copied was the Kurz cartridge which they improved significantly with the 7.62x39 cartridge. This cartrige was around in the SKS for a while before the AK-47 was produced.

Historically I believe the Stg44 is overrated. Its not even the first "assault rifle" according to its own definition.
 
I don't really see why assault rifles are in this category. Yes, they share similarities with rifles, but are entirely another class of weapons in my eyes.

That aside, shouldn't you have put the MP-44 on there? As the AK-47 really is a knock-off of that. No matter how much Kalashnikov denies it, it's true. The similarities are too close to be coincidence.

the lee enfield was considered an assault rifle when it was introduced.

the ak-47 really is not a knock off of stg-44. dont judge a book by its cover.i know they look kinda similar, but dont let that fool you.

its not true at all, the way they work are totally diffrent, there was no design similar to that of ak-47 before he made it. he dosent have to deny it, if you find out how each rifle works you would know this. i dont know the name of many of the parts in a rifle in english or i would explain it to you.

also the banana magazine was first used for a russian assault rifle that only made it to prototype stage years earlier (first assault rifle ever iirc).

check wiki for more info.

the similarities, i think the back end of it (reciver?) and the front part above the barrel look alot like G3, the things it has in common with ak-47 is the banana magazine, the size and the front sight.

im sure the russians were somewhat inspired by the looks of stg-44, but the action is much more important than the looks.
 
BTW the Mauser is still in action, well in some way, as the Wachbataillion, which greets foreign politicians for example, is still parading with the 98.
But not more in combat however.

Adler

i had a beautiful picture on my harddrive of some kurdish women, 1 armed with a kar-98, 1 armed with a m1 garand , 1 armed with a G3 and another one armed with a browning highpower 9mm.

ill try to dig it up.
 
i had a beautiful picture on my harddrive of some kurdish women, 1 armed with a kar-98, 1 armed with a m1 garand , 1 armed with a G3 and another one armed with a browning highpower 9mm.

ill try to dig it up.

please do that would be a great photo
 
there you go:



file name says kurdish rebels 1980, probably Iraq. also its kinda hard to tell which pistol it is, so browning highpower was probably just my guess.

ps.now that i look at it im not so sure the rifle is a kar-98 either.
 
dont forget the bayonet...i wonder if it is the one that came with the garand? look like it to me. But im probally wrong.
 
Its probably a Turkish mauser bayonet.
35200.jpg
 
good call, looks like the ones i always see in the WW2 movies, and most of those were turkish mauser ones
 
I detest the M16. Its propensity for jamming, and its lack of reliability in inclement weather, should keep it off this list altogether.

This was only a problem when it was first introduced, after about a year of production all the bugs were worked out. I used one for 2 years and it never jammed on me
 
I'm suprised to see the Steyr AUG on the list... has it even seen any real action? I would say the H&K G3 would be significantly more deserving.
 
Back
Top Bottom