Another Desk
Chieftain
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2001
- Messages
- 7
ComradeRed: I see no inherent problems in replacing the ideals of representative democracy and capitalism in civ3 vanilla with socialist ideals and theory.
However, as far as gameplay goes, I think you're starting to run the riskt of transforming the game into a crash course in marxist and socialist theory. This is a game, and balanced gaming should go before everything else, including political content.
An Industrial Base wonder? Automated Economy wonder? These are probably better illustrated by having a high shield production and lots of factories and manufacturing plants. Successful Nationalized Economy? What's this if not a civ with some kind of socialist government and a lot of happy people?
And what do you mean by Perfect Humanitarianism? Why do you need to be Marxist Communist to build it?
Green economy should have some sort of drawback. After all, we today have the technology for a green economy and we know it would be good. Still we're not implementing it. Why? Probably some kind of commercial drawback, or less food from each square -- you've decided not to push the environment as far as you can.
The anarchosocialist and (possibly) the marxist socialism governments could encourage the building of many smaller cities rather than a few megacities. Is this possible? Less coruption from some kind of improvment (local governing board) but less commercial gain than capitalism and corporativism? I'm out of my depth here -- I may be totally wrong on this view of anarchism and marxism socialism.
However, as far as gameplay goes, I think you're starting to run the riskt of transforming the game into a crash course in marxist and socialist theory. This is a game, and balanced gaming should go before everything else, including political content.
An Industrial Base wonder? Automated Economy wonder? These are probably better illustrated by having a high shield production and lots of factories and manufacturing plants. Successful Nationalized Economy? What's this if not a civ with some kind of socialist government and a lot of happy people?
And what do you mean by Perfect Humanitarianism? Why do you need to be Marxist Communist to build it?
Green economy should have some sort of drawback. After all, we today have the technology for a green economy and we know it would be good. Still we're not implementing it. Why? Probably some kind of commercial drawback, or less food from each square -- you've decided not to push the environment as far as you can.
The anarchosocialist and (possibly) the marxist socialism governments could encourage the building of many smaller cities rather than a few megacities. Is this possible? Less coruption from some kind of improvment (local governing board) but less commercial gain than capitalism and corporativism? I'm out of my depth here -- I may be totally wrong on this view of anarchism and marxism socialism.