Ultimate 2 Player C3C PBEM

It's turn 123. I haven't updated my page all week because work has been a killer! I apologize to all my fans who read my site (both of you) and will try to update more often. Anyway, I have updated it today and will try to do a little more tonight after dinner, maybe tomorrow.

Anyway, we have both been busy settling and trying to gobble up the land. Predesad has done a much better job than me at expanding. I think my problem is I'm not use to playing these big maps. Most of my maps are on standard and smaller and I know how much land to grab, how many cities to build for corruption, etc... This big map is a challenge for me and I think I invested too much time in improvements while Predesad spent his time making a lot more settlers than I did. Anyway, the game is going good.

Updated Iroquois page
Updated Ottoman page

alliance
 
Turn 131 - The Mayans (DogBoy) have met the Sumerians (Predesad) and it was not a pleasant meeting. I offered our usual 50 turn peace treaty expecting it to be signed. Predesad sent me an e-mail back basicallay telling me he couldn't trust the Mayans because I "violated" the agreement of no galleys in the other person's waters. I told him I never violated an agreement between the Mayans and the Sumerians because they never made such agreement. True, other civs of ours have made that agreement but not the Mayans and the Sumerians. In addition, I sent him a pic which made him eat his words. You can find it on the Mayan page.

updated the Ottoman saying page
updated the Mayan page

alliance
 
*note to all, this post is completely in character

here is a copy of the exchange between the sumerians and mayans

Sir Mayan DogBoy,
We noted your arrival within Ottoman borders last turn, we are suprised to have lasted so long without seeing you as the Persians have reported long ago about the dangerous journey's across the ocean expanse you were taking off the tip of the Mayan Peninsula. We scold you for attempting such suicidal venture's, do you not realize you cold have fallen off this flat world? How many brave sailor's have lost lives in undertaking such risks just to satisfy the Mayan ruler?
We also are wondering if yu are going to continue to build the Great LIbrary this time, or will you abandon it as before?
We are disturbed by the presence of your galleuy in our waters. The Predesad brother's have had many agreements with the DogBoy brothers which permitted curragh's to pass through waters, but never galleys. In fact, I believe the Celtic's reported you in fact specifically stated "for curragh's only" I could be wrong.
We will not be giving the Mayans any peace agreements at this time. We have decided to observe their actions further while they venture to our great continent. Should the Mayans refrain from doing anything which angers the peace loving Sumerians, then in time we might in fact grant peace to the Mayans, but we would of course first have to consult with the Celts and Persians as they are the leading experts on Mayan activity.
Sumerian Predesad

Sir Tyrant Mayan DogBoy,

We were in fact not accusing you of having violating any ageements, we were just suprised you would place a galey in our waters. It has long been an agreement between the Ottomans / Iroquois & the Sumerians / Indians as well as the French / Mayans & Celts / Persians that curraghs only were permitted in each other's waters. Despite not having contacted us yet, we were observant of the fact you took advantage of the absence of any agreements to go ahead and move your galley into our waters. This was just one way in which we are planning to test Mayan actions.

Surely a peace loving civ would have contacted his allies concerning any deals between his neighbors and would have sought to interact with those neighbors in a similar manner. We would have at least appreciated a polite request before taking such action, you could have remained in Ottoman waters until this request was answered but you chose not to. If the Mayans are not going to consider observing the protocol of their own allies regarding the Sumerians this speaks very loudly to us.

We have contacted the Indians preparing to scold them for such actions as moving their galley in Iroquois waters and we appreciate you calling that to our attention. The Indians, however, claim this incident occurred through no fault of their own. The Indians claim to have moved their galley into an unclaimed coastal square, only to find the very next turn that Iroquois borders had expanded and they were inside Iroquois waters, the galley retreated to neutral waters immediately. If this incident is found to have occurred in another manner we will promptly issue a full apology on behalf of the Indians and they will apologize as well. If the incident needs further investigation, we will assist in these efforts as well.

It is not the movement of the galley in our waters which causes us to deny the peace agreement. Even if this had not occurred, we do not feel it would be wise on our part to restrict ourselves at this time while we are still in the process of securing our lands. We fear no Mayan troops, and if necessary will respond to any unwelcome actions on the part of the Mayans with force. If the Mayans want a peace agreement with the Sumerians they would have to agree to a long list of restrictions.

In the meantime, as long as the Mayans do not set foot or ship inside any Sumerian or Indian borders, or venture between the Sumerian mountains to the peninsula which divides the Indians from the Iroquois, or otherwise threaten the Sumerians or Indians, then they shall be safe from war. These lands belong to the Indians and the Sumerians and we will defend them with everything we have at our disposal. Our workers stand strong with their pick axes, waiting to tear you apart should you misstep.

Yours Truly,

King Sumerian Predesad
 
Something is going screwy with the e-mails so I'm posting it here also.

Yes, extend the peace treaty. But extend it 50 turns. Do not let the peace run out.
 
peace between french / mayans and persians extended only 20 turns while sumerians continue to monitor mayan activity
 
Well, now I know why Predesad of the Celts only wanted to extend the Mayan-Celts treaty for 20 turns. He claimed he only wanted to extend it 20 turns because the Mayans were not to be trusted because they sailed a galley into Sumerian waters BEFORE the Mayans and the Sumerians ever signed a peace treaty. His claims may be true, but I think he only signed a 20 turn peace treaty to prepare for war. Predesad has announced his intentions of declaring war on the Mayans using the Celts. He tried to stall me by not answering my requests for extending our peace deal for 2 turns but I told him I wasn't playing the turn until I got an answer. He has also informed me that there may be a way to avoid this war and he will give me his demands in about 5 turns, which if I'm correct, is the turn our peace runs out. I will be taking pictures of what will surely be a bloody and devasting conflict and posting them on my crummy page.

Updated the Mayan page (I'm on Mayan page 2 now)

alliance
 
Originally posted by DogBoy
Well, now I know why Predesad of the Celts only wanted to extend the Mayan-Celts treaty for 20 turns. He claimed he only wanted to extend it 20 turns because the Mayans were not to be trusted because they sailed a galley into Sumerian waters BEFORE the Mayans and the Sumerians ever signed a peace treaty. His claims may be true, but I think he only signed a 20 turn peace treaty to prepare for war. Predesad has announced his intentions of declaring war on the Mayans using the Celts. He tried to stall me by not answering my requests for extending our peace deal for 2 turns but I told him I wasn't playing the turn until I got an answer. He has also informed me that there may be a way to avoid this war and he will give me his demands in about 5 turns, which if I'm correct, is the turn our peace runs out. I will be taking pictures of what will surely be a bloody and devasting conflict and posting them on my crummy page.

Updated the Mayan page (I'm on Mayan page 2 now)

alliance

The Persians only wanted peace for 20 turns, not the Celts, and they wanted it to just 20 turns so that the new expiration would be near the Celtic expiration. The Celts declared war this turn on the mayans, and the Perisans announced thier intentions to declare war on the Mayans and French when those peace agreements expire.

Here is a copy of the message:

"King DogBoy of the Mayans-

Our peace agreement currently expires in 5 turns, prepare for war.

King Predesad of the Persians

--------------------------------------------------------

King DogBoy of the French-

Our peace agreement expires in 7 turns, prepare for war.

King Predesad of the Persians

-----------------------------------------------

King DogBoy of the Mayans-

Currently you and your brothers the French are facing war. We have already declared war on you, but have attacked none of your units or even violated your borders. We are willing to hold back our troops and promise to keep Persia from declaring war on you also if yu can meet our terms.

You must gift every city which borders your lands and Persia to the Persians, you will have 5 turns to build any units you desire form these cities before gifting. You must gift every city between your capitol, Chichen Itza, and our lands to us, also having 5 turns before gifting. You are not permitted to sell any improvements in those cities or pillage any tiles in the radius of those cities. You must persuade all of your allies, the French, the Ottomans, and the Iroquios to agree not to attack any of these cities you gift, even if they should go to war with us or the Persians for 50 turns. You must agree to a 50 turn peace agreement. You must empty all units from Chichen Itza and allow us to capture it, our troops we begin moving there immediately. You must disband all Crusaders immediately and any future crusaders which are generated by the Knight's Templar before we capture Chichen Itza. You must also agree to send 5 Javelin Throwers into the open desert on what is currently your side of the mountain range to "sport" with 5 of our Gallic Swordsmen, thus potentially allowing both of our civs to enjoy a Golden Age if you do not have one already.

France I am afraid does not seem able to avoid war, the Persians are intent upon war with them shortly, but we promise our neutrality so long as no other nations interfere in this war.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Should you reject the terms of this proposal and elect to go to war, then I propose we abide by the following code of conduct while at war:

-send via email with the turn a summary of any battles which took place during our turn since they are unseen by the other player

-agree not to gift cities to our mutual allies (although they are permitted to gift cities to the civs at war) which would involve them in this war also, an exception would be Mayan / French & Persian / Celtic with the understanding that even gifting cities between those allies might jeopardize the Celtic / French peace treaty

-because of the nature of the locked alliance, it is very possible all of our civs will end up technically at war with each other. we should agree to continue to abide by the peace agreements and not use this in game quirk to attack or take other action which would normally cause war between these civs since the other player might not be able to know for certain of such action and it would violate the peace agreements

-these clauses are all independent of each other, pick and choose what you will agree to if you cannot humble yourself enough to avoid this war. we believe the war favors us slightly, you have gunpowder, we have gunpowder, we have iron, you have crusaders, we believe the French probabaly have resources which are not hooked up yet in their mountains."

btw- regarding DogBoy's threat to not play the turn if I did not respond about the peace extension. I finally told him I planned war only because of his persistance and the fact I was going to announce it in 2 turns anyway. I have never let a player use stalling a game to force my hand in diplomacy and I never will, I would let a game die first, I say this so other players do not try this tactic, I do not think DogBoy was actually serious in his threat because in the email he said (out of character) he could not play because his wife was making him... I mean politely asked him to go shopping with her and I felt he was going to play the turn when he got a chance regardless.
 
Here is a copy of the reply I gave to him. As you can see, I think he asked for way too much. What he is basically telling me is you are going to die. Either you don't agree and I will kill you now, or agree and I will kill you later, most likely in 50 turns. By giving up my capitol and more than half my cities, what am I left with? I'm left with about 7 cities that are in no-bonus grassland, mountains with volcanoes that keep erupting, and a lot of jungle I'm still clearing. On another note, I would not have held the game up to find out his answer. The answer was in the game in the form of a stack of pikeman. I really did have to go shopping and the e-mail popped up just as we were walking out the door.

King Predesad of the Persians,
I recognize that you will declare war on me in 5 turns. So be it.
King DogBoy of the Mayans

King Predesad of the Persians,
I recognize that you will declare war on me in 7 turns. So be it.
King DogBoy of the French

King Predesad of the Celts,
Your demands are too much. I might have agreed with gifting you those cities as they are pretty much worthless to me anyway. But your demands of my capitol were too much. If I gift you my capitol, I am gifting you the game. I realize that I might possible, or probably lose my capitol anyway. But now you will have to lose soldiers doing so, instead of just capturing it without sheding any blood. I had heard tales of your legendary diplomacy skills, but frankly, I was not impressed this time. If you truly wanted some of my cities without bloodshed then you would have known where to draw the line, but you stepped over the line. Now many of our people will die.
King DogBoy of the Mayans

King Predesad of the Celts,
I assure you that the French have no plans to aid the Mayans in this war. I approach you only to remind you of the peace our two nations have enjoyed and which shall continue to enjoy. I wish to remind you that peace betweens us shall last until turn 203.
King DogBoy of the French

-------------------------------------------------

I agree to battle reports. It sucks not knowing what went on.

I agree to not having the Ottomans/Iroquois get into it with the Sumerians/Indians because of locked alliances. However, I do see a problem because trade between the Ottomans and the Iroqouis will be cut off if we go to war. When that happens, you should also discontinue trade between the Sumerians and the Indians. Of course, I can't monitor that so it's based upon the honor system. If you do not agree to this, then I must find some means to re-establish the trade between the Ottomans and the Iroquois
 
Unfortunately, I am afraid there has been an incident in this game which might create tension between the two players, myself and DogBoy. He gifted cities to the French as my troop[s were lined up putside to attack. This was a tactic to prevent / limit the Celtic ability to wage war with the Mayans. I had warned that a tactic such as this would jeopardize the peace agreement. The French, I feel, involved themselves in this war and I destroyed the city, it was a mayan city up until this turn and hopefully this issue will not place a strain between us, but I do not know how he will respond. Especially since he laimed in his email the french would not aid the Mayans. Here is a copy of my answer to him and the battle summary, merely preliminary posturing by the Cetls, most if not all our units which advanced near his territory will be lost surely this turn:

King DogBoy of the French,

I am glads to hear that yuo will not interfere in the war between the Cetls and Mayans, it will assure your nation of peace from us for many many turns to come and we hope our peace treaty can indeed be renewed. However, first there is a certain matter which must be resolved, it seems the Mayans tried to disguise one of their cities as a French city, we simply were not buying it and the city was subsequently destroyed. We found this caused our people to be at war with your people, but we assure you no damage has been incurred by the French people. Mayan citizens, disguised as French naturally, were killed, no French units were present, and we did not loot any gold, therefore since this attack in reality was against the Mayans and not the French we see no reason why there should not be continued peace between our people and extend a peace offer to you.

If however, this was indeed French interference in the war after we warned we could only maintain peace if the French did not become involved and after the French stated they would not aid the Mayans then perhaps the French are wanting to disregard the peace agreement, we hope this is not the case, but if it is, so be it.

We noticed another city disguised as French, we suggest this be remedied immediately and no further incidents such as this occur in the future.

Battle Summary (M=Mayan, C=Celtic, def=defeat)

M city X-something or other (under French disguise) destroyed
Gallic Swordsman def M warrior near Lapurdum
C knight def M crusader @ saltpeter colony
M Spearman def Gallic Swordsman outside M colony
C Knight def M Spear outside M colony
C Kinght def M Spear outisde M colony
M Spear def Longbowman near C territory
Longbowman def M Spear (same Spear as above)
M Galley def C Galley off north Celtic coast

OOC: i expect we will have different views about the French / Mayan trade for a city, I see this as voluntary French involvement in the war.
 
Yes, we do have very different views on this war. He attacked me without any warning. Here is the e-mail I sent to him.

King Predesad of the Celts,
You conducted a sneak attack against me and destroyed one of my cities. This happened when we still hade 40+ turns of peace left. Your actions are despicable. Consider us at a state of war.

King DogBoy of the French

---------------------------------------------
C knight destroys M longbowmen at saltpeter colony
M longbomen destroys C knight at saltpeter colony
C knight destroys M longbowmen at saltpeter colony
C gallic swordsmen destroys M longbowmen at saltpeter colony
C gallic swordsmen destroys M longbowmen at saltpeter colony
C gallic swordsmen destroys M longbowmen at saltpeter colony
M longbomen destroys C gallic swordsmen at saltpeter colony
M longbomen destroys C knight at saltpeter colony
C knight destroys M horsemen at saltpeter colony
C knight destroys M longbowmen at saltpeter colony

As you can see, the RNG was very mean to me this turn.
 
I have asked DogBoy to back the turn up to the point i destroyed the french city gifted to them by the mayans, here why:

when i loaded that turn the persians are my first civ, i saw the french cities on their map so i knew what he had done before i ever got to the celts turn. i took my first three turns (persia, sumeria, india) then saved the game before taking celts turn. i checked our diplomacy to make sure i had warned him that trading cities between maya and france might result in a cancellation of the peace agreement. the french had stated they were not going to aid the mayans, but this was an obvious interference in the war.

therefore, i felt i had good reason to cancel the deal and had to make a decision to sneak attack or give a turn warning, i elected to sneak attack because i was prepared to wipe that city out that turn anyway and then try to find his units which would surely be in those mountains, which they were right about where i thought they would be. i figured he would probably expect i would destroy the french city.

however, i must apologize because i made a mistake. our treaty was signed many turns ago (it is the same basic treaty signed by the sumerians and ottomans all the way back on turn 23) and has gone through numerous extensions and i have neglected to pay attention to the terms of the treaty in this situation. we clearly agreed to give a 10 turn notice before cancelling the treaty, i forgot about this detail and i must apologize for it as it was not my intention to violate this term of our agreement. when i remembered this i realized he probably gifted the city expecting to get 10 turns which i had guaranteed to him and therefore my attack i feel was dishonorable.

since this is a game and not real life, i would like to erase my mistake, not because i rethought my decision but because i unintentionally neglected to abide by the exact terms. since i had saved before taking the celts turn last time i only had to replay their turn. i played it the same basic way i would have if i had not known for certain about his units location, they are where most players would expect them to be anyway. given that the replay results in my inability to get to those units because the french city was not destroyed and i cannot use the roads, they might not even be there when i do get there, or their might be numerous other units or whatever, obviously he has ample time to change the situation, i think this is what he was trying to do anyway was buy more time so i dont think it hurts him.

if he disagrees to allow me to replay the previous celtic turn and take bakc the oversight, then i respectfully ask that DogBoy accepts my apology for having violated the terms of the agreement and does not accuse me of playing dishonorably (which he has not as of yet) and we will proceed forward from the next turn he just sent, that's his decision. i am glad this is just a 2 player game and i have the opportunity to correct this oversight. i am normally much more careful with treaties and offer no excuses, i should have double checked the treaty when i double checked the diplomacy.

having said all that, here is diplomacy from the replay if he accepts the replay:

King DogBoy of the French:

What trickery is this? You state you will not aid the Mayans in the war, which would be a wise decision as Persia will be more than enough for you to handle. But then you seek to cut off my forces by taking over mayan border cities. I hereby give you 10 turns to rectify the situation or I will be forced to cancel our peace agreement, furthermore, future actions on your part which do interfere in this war will not be given such generous lengthy time periods for correction when my people's lives are at stake. If you do not abandon those cities immediately then we will declare war on you in 10 turns.

King Predesad of the Celts

results of battles

M spear def C longbow near celt borders
C longbow def M spear near celt borders
Gallic Swordmans def M Warrior north celt territory
M galley def C galley north celtic coast

these were the same battles i had fought the previous turn and i was not able to fight anymore battles without wiping out the city and using those roads.
 
I am virtually ceding this game to DogBoy. It is not that I have given up, I am going to continue to play, but I am certain the victory is his even tough our war is young.

When I planned the war I did not have gunpowder, then about 2 turns before war I got gunpowder and my Persian saltpeter was very near to France. What was to be an invasion force into French territory has now been reduced to saltpeter defensive duty. To make matters worse, my iron is all the way on the other side of my civ, and horses, well they are scatterred as well, it is going to be too difficult to defend resources and fight any war. If I offer peace then I am screwed because I am behind due to war preparations, my only recourse is to hold on and hope DogBoy manages to screw up.

To make matters worse, "The Dog Boy Ploy" of gifting Mayan cities to civs the Celts are supposed to be at peace with has prevented this war from even matarializing. I had intended to harass the Mayans with the Persians as a distraction while preparing the Celtic war machine to steam roll through Mayan lands and this would have been done very quickly.

I cannot do this because I had to wait 10 turns to declare war on Frnace. Then instead of abandoning those cities as I demanded in order to preserve peace, those cities became Ottoman property, now comes a 10 turn wait until they become Iroquois property, then 10 more turns and then The Celts will have to be at war with everyone to prevent these same tactics form being used over and over again.

I am not accusing DogBoy of doing anything wrong, in fact I am commending him for going this route. I tried to get him to agree not to use the two civs on the other continent for this war, but he would not agree to that. Because I will play honorably, my hands are tied, and I think this game is doomed for me.

Irregardless, I hereby challenge DogBoy to Ultimate 2 Player II, to begin as soon as this game ends, with the slight possibility of it starting sooner. Since I allowed him to pick all the settings for our first game and pick civs first, I am challenging him to now allow me to do the same. I await your response.
 
I hearby formally accept "U2". In fact, I was the one that mentioned this about 4-5 days ago. My idea was to do a 'palegeo map but I will let you pick the settings and your civs first, then I pick civs, then you can re-pick civs, etc...similar to our agreement in this game. We can wait until this game ends or we can start sooner, the choice is yours. You know I'm ready to start anytime.

As for ceeding this game to me, HARDLY! This war is still young and I have seen your forces. I think you are saying that so I will become complacent and lower my guard while you are secretly planning a naval end-around attack. Well, I have planned for that as well. I saw your Celtic curragh off the eastern French coast and I am sure you have galleys that will be loading up with Celtic units that invade my back door. Another indicator of this is your 2 (or was it 3?) galleys near the Mayan-Celtic mountain range is no longer there. Only one galley remains so I wonder what happened to the other two?

I am glad you are playing honorably by the rules, as am I. I can't help but think other people would have broken the rules that we set and attacked me (this has happened to me in other games).

This is getting exciting.
 
Yes, you did mention 'U2" a few days back, but you never answered my email, i am going to start a new thread for a new challenge, but i am going to give a couple options for the next game, i'm a little burned out on locked alliances and would like to take a break, we can do u2 later and another type of game now where we only have one civ which we could start sooner and play consistently. or we could do u2 now, but start date i am unsure. when i get thread up i will send link.

as far as ceding this game, yes you have seen my forces, and the celts are stalled at the mountians, unable to get through your forces and obligated to abide by agreement with other nations who have used the Mayans as patsies by taking over their cities. as for the persians, they have one very small stack in mayan territory, a minor annoyance more than anything else, and other than that, resource location has us playing defense right now, i have already been forced to abandon 2 cities so i can protect the saltpeter and eventually i will have to give it up, no way around it. in the meantime, france is stripping me of centuries of work with all that pillaging.

and all those celtic galleys sunk in the ocean except for that one who is playing spy.
 
Back
Top Bottom