Archon_Wing
Vote for me or die
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
- Messages
- 5,257
For obvious reasons, this is before rifling.
So I just thought of this, and usually if going steel, I would use muskets to go with cannons and eventually upgrade the muskets to rifles. But waiting for rifling and cannons to make the first push is too late for any meaningfully difficult game.
Take a scenario where you have beelined to steel and the enemy has mostly maces, knights, and eventually muskets (mostly a non-factor). You just go up to their cities, and destroy everything in them, but what's to actually stop your cannons from being damaged en route?
The game chooses the defender with the highest strength and that would be the cannon by far (12 vs 9). So unless the muskets are combat I and on a hill/forrest, the cannons would be picked to defend. No other unit would have a high enough base strength to matter. Maces have 8 and bonus vs melee.... but that only affects other maces that just cancel out the bonus. X-bows don't have a high base strength. Oh, I guess you could have knights, but then if you have horses then it'd make more sense to go Military Tradition. Or you're Spain with Conqs and Citadels, but that's pretty obscure.
The only thing that changes this before rifles or grenadiers would be pikes against horse units. Or that HRE UU!Knights are obviously the greatest threat here as their flank attacks would quickly rip cannons apart.
Now, I guess this you should always find their biggest set of units and destroy them before you push deep into their territory and your forces should be so concentrated that this isn't an issue. But in reality though, what is the point of muskets beyond defending cities then? I suppose there is the draft.
Tl;dr Not having horses really sucks.
Tl;dr 2 Or does that mean..... Grenadiers?
So I just thought of this, and usually if going steel, I would use muskets to go with cannons and eventually upgrade the muskets to rifles. But waiting for rifling and cannons to make the first push is too late for any meaningfully difficult game.
Take a scenario where you have beelined to steel and the enemy has mostly maces, knights, and eventually muskets (mostly a non-factor). You just go up to their cities, and destroy everything in them, but what's to actually stop your cannons from being damaged en route?
The game chooses the defender with the highest strength and that would be the cannon by far (12 vs 9). So unless the muskets are combat I and on a hill/forrest, the cannons would be picked to defend. No other unit would have a high enough base strength to matter. Maces have 8 and bonus vs melee.... but that only affects other maces that just cancel out the bonus. X-bows don't have a high base strength. Oh, I guess you could have knights, but then if you have horses then it'd make more sense to go Military Tradition. Or you're Spain with Conqs and Citadels, but that's pretty obscure.
The only thing that changes this before rifles or grenadiers would be pikes against horse units. Or that HRE UU!
Now, I guess this you should always find their biggest set of units and destroy them before you push deep into their territory and your forces should be so concentrated that this isn't an issue. But in reality though, what is the point of muskets beyond defending cities then? I suppose there is the draft.
Tl;dr Not having horses really sucks.
Tl;dr 2 Or does that mean..... Grenadiers?
Last edited: