To this I would add the right to privacy (though one could admittedly argue it is included under Amendment 9), and property (implied by amendments 4 and again 9, but never explicitly stated, IIRC).
But yes, the USA's body of rights is pretty good overall.*
* With the exception of the death penalty, which I believe should be outlawed, but that is controversial enough that if I had argued that along with the other ones above, it would obfuscate the point of the post.
I means you can pursue a big screen TV, but are in no ways entitled to one.
happiness is a big screen tv.
If people live in a commune, monastery, or similar, they have no personal property, but that doesn't make them oppressed or anything like that. There is nothing wrong with this kind of socioeconomic system.
Don't you know? The monks just end up playing tennis or something.monasteries dont work?
monasteries dont work?
Except that it never works.
Indeed.monasteries dont work?
Does every single person in that society agree with that goal?while i understand the authoritarian form of communism being your enemy on this basis, what if a society decides they want to adopt the economic aspects?