What civilization should we play?

What civ should we play?

  • Romans

    Votes: 10 17.2%
  • Greeks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Babylonians

    Votes: 7 12.1%
  • Persians

    Votes: 7 12.1%
  • Egytpians

    Votes: 4 6.9%
  • Zulu

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Indians

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • Chinese

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • Japanese

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • Iroquois

    Votes: 4 6.9%
  • Aztecs

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • Russians

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • English

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • French

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • Germans

    Votes: 10 17.2%
  • Americans

    Votes: 1 1.7%

  • Total voters
    58
The Persians should also be included because they are only one vote behind. As the votes are scattered alot then it makes sense to perhaps have 5 choices for the next vote because you do not kn ow whether they would have voted for the Perisians as their second choice.
 
I like the idea of a revote, but i think we should limit it to the first three options. If we take too many we will probably get the same result as the first time.
 
I don't like the idea for a revote much.So by default i won't hold a poll for a revote ,if a concerned citizin feel's it is his duty to hold a poll asking if a revote is nessecary ,then i won't stop him.In that case i hope that citizin make's sure his poll has good option's.
 
I voted for the Germans.
I like Rome too, but as the Germans I usually kick thier butts royally.
I find thier UU is too early especially if it is an archepeligo game map.
As the Romans I had fun, but I found that civs with later UUs were harder to kill. (Russians, Americans, Germans etc)
 
I think we should go with the Greeks, as to try to play a more peaceful game. The hoplite will help us defend our borders when we are weak in the early game.
 
so how long is this poll going to be open? should we have a revote:

_ romans
_germans
_babylonians
_persians


we need to close this out
 
_ romans
_germans
_babylonians
_persians
_iroquois

Duck, if you're intending to start playing on April 1st, you should open another thread soon!
 
Since the leaders (Germany/Romans) have a visible majority I'd say a revote isn't necessary. Whichever one wins, wins. If it ends up with the two of them tied then have a one day runoff.

Persia is still better than either of them though!:p
 
We have 29 people who didn't vote for these leaders.
I think a revote would be the most fair path to take!
 
A vote with 16 choices and only 44 total votes does not make a good 'one pass' election, especially with a decision with THIS much impact on the game play.

Although I like the second tier nations, Iro's, Persians, Babs, I would recommend a re-vote with the top two -- to get started quickly, and with assurance of a majority backiing. If you want more choices, the ones Pggar listed would be the way to go.

Poll us again, mighty moderator :P
Charis
 
I like the idea of a revote, but i think we should limit it to the first three options. If we take too many we will probably get the same result as the first time.

We have 29 people who didn't vote for these leaders.
I think a revote would be the most fair path to take!
Duck, if you're intending to start playing on April 1st, you should open another thread soon!

so how long is this poll going to be open? should we have a revote:
_ romans
_germans
_babylonians
_persians



Sigh ,i guess i have no choice since this is a democracy. :rolleyes:

Ok then ,new poll opend with Cyc's suggestion as option's.

but people ,know that this is not America over here ,so we won't revote everytime whenerver somebody doesn't like's it to loose.
:rolleyes:

click here to jump to the new poll
 
Back
Top Bottom