Warrior rush works on Prince or below.
hehe, fair point, but how many Prince-level
players can actually pull off a Warrior/Quecha rush with any consistency?
And isn't the Monarch+ Quecha rush a different beast to the Prince-or-lower Warrior rush?
That's certainly my experience - I had to back out of a Q-rush in a recent Prince game, whereas I can consistently pull it off on Monarch or Emperor.
InFlux5 said:
"Specialist Economy" is a somewhat novel CivFanatics concept
CE and SE as formal concepts are both unique to those who discuss civ strategy, but an understanding of the actual mechanics by which you get your research from specialists is another matter altogether.
The first time I played the game I couldn't see any value in cottages, went for what I now realise was an SE (settling all my GPs), and beat noble at the first attempt. And that's the way I continued to play until I got curious about getting my research from trade routes, did some experiments, and came across civfanatics while looking for a few hints.
Only once I started reading here did I learn how to play CE (thanks Dave!). My SE and trade route games undoubtedly improved as a result of reading stuff here, but my CE game only came about as a result of the forums.
I'm not saying SE is better, or that trying an SE will
necessarily lead to a dramatic improvement in a player's game (though it might). What I'm saying is that it works, it's fun, and it's different - just as the CE was for me when I first discovered it.
I just don't buy all this "don't try that strategy/leader/etc." lark. If the OP tries an SE and doesn't like it, then I'm sure he'll go back to what he does like. So where's the problem?