MarcoFurio
Chieftain
Now the Gorgo has finally showed up as Greece 2nd leader, which 2nd leader would you chose for your favorite civ? And what would be his/her unique ability?
So, your main argument is "damn those who might be offended to their politically correct utopia" ? Not only I don't think it's the main problem with having Hitler as a leader for Germany in Civ 6 (you remember that it's forbidden to depict Hitler in Germany right ?), but it's also a very childish way of thinking. You should wish for leaders you want to play as, not leaders that would offend people so you can sneer at them.I would like to see multiple leaders to represent different epochs. Of course the epoch I'd most enjoy would be WWII era, with Churchill, Stalin, and of course Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler for Germany, and damn those who might be offended to their politically correct utopia.
I don't think it should be a factor if a leader was in previous games or not. If a leader is a good choice, they should be in the game. Bismarck is the best choice for Germany, Elizabeth is the best choice for England, et cetera...Good, except, we need to see more new leaders, ones never before featured in the previous iterations.
Also, it's quite possible each nation will have 1 Male and 1 Female ruler, so no two males per civ allowed (personally I don't mind it at all, females are far more pleasing to the eye, even though having consorts replace famous rulers makes no historical sense what so ever, but hey, it's only a game)
Good, except, we need to see more new leaders, ones never before featured in the previous iterations.
Also, it's quite possible each nation will have 1 Male and 1 Female ruler, so no two males per civ allowed (personally I don't mind it at all, females are far more pleasing to the eye, even though having consorts replace famous rulers makes no historical sense what so ever, but hey, it's only a game)
Yeah, well, in CII there was Eleanor Roosevelt, if I remember correctly, Sheherezade for Persia, as well as Livia for Rome. All had no business being there, considering the truly great male rulers omitted in their place, but like I said, Firaxis does what they want and all we, the commoners, can do is buy and play the game, such are the rules.I don't expect this to happen. Not all civilizations had a female ruler. America is a prime example unless you can argue a First Lady had more power than a president. This would also limit Firaxis choices for civilizations. I think it's great that we have female rulers but adding them just for the sake of adding them is a bit too much IMHO.
I am pretty sure Firaxis will not repeat the mistake from Civ II.Yeah, well, in CII there was Eleanor Roosevelt, if I remember correctly, Sheherezade for Persia, as well as Livia for Rome. All had no business being there, considering the truly great male rulers omitted in their place, but like I said, Firaxis does what they want and all we, the commoners, can do is buy and play the game, such are the rules.