• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days (this includes any time you see the message "account suspended"). For more updates please see here.

What's a liberal?

Oh come on, wouldn't it have been better to ignore the post in the first place?
 
Ah, talking of strawmen:

Hmmmm. Humor isnt apparently your forte I see....points were made as sweeping generalizations, so who cares if its strawman or not? I didnt know we were doing it for a grade. :rolleyes:

I went to University for 3 years, and have a well paid job, thanks. What about you?

2 years, joined the military and doing very well. Thanks for asking.
 
Read below to see what Robert Frost said about the meaning of a liberal.
 
Well, yeah. If you like.

I prefer: "I would have a battle of wits, but I dislike fighting an unarmed man".
 
Read below to see what Robert Frost said about the meaning of a liberal.

Would a conservative be someone too bankrupt of original, useful thought that finds quoting someone thats been dead for over 40 years an intelligent smack at liberals?
 
Would a conservative be someone too bankrupt of original, useful thought that finds quoting someone thats been dead for over 40 years an intelligent smack at liberals?

I'm not smart enough to follow your logic...Sorry
 
I'm not smart enough to follow your logic...Sorry

The quote has little basis in reality. I'm still trying to figure out why you would even consider it sig. worthy, let alone "replacement for an actual argument against liberals" worthy.
 
Liberals in the USA... the stereotype.

Big government, high tax, pseudo-intellectuals:
1. who want to legislate unlimited abortion (a.k.a. backdoor euthanasia of the lower classes and lower races) through a fake concern for the welfare of the poor and disadvantaged.
2. who disincentivize productivity and personal responsibility through a gigantic expensive welfare state, so the elite "servants of the people" will end up in control of the working class who are serving their interests happily, said working class thinking they're getting a good deal when they are really getting scraps.
3. who feign interest in the environment all the while driving around in gas guzzling limos and flying private jets, because they are representatives of the working class.

Liberals, the reality:
Uh, despite all the rhetoric, they're mostly normal.

Caveat:
Conservatives, the reality:
Uh, despite all the rhetoric, they're mostly normal.
 
@atlas: I actually see how it might. Not all liberals (and certainly this is not exclusive to liberals) may do this, but some people are so unwilling to risk offense or confrontation that they are unable to actually take a stance. Also, so what if the guy died more than 40 years ago?

@SR: I agree. I have found that most people on most points of the spectrum are pretty darned normal (for certain broad definitions of "normal") and decent people.
 
Not very conservative, dying.
 
@atlas: I actually see how it might. Not all liberals (and certainly this is not exclusive to liberals) may do this, but some people are so unwilling to risk offense or confrontation that they are unable to actually take a stance. Also, so what if the guy died more than 40 years ago?

Some people is a far cry from liberals in general. I don't really know many liberals unwilling to risk offense or confrontation. Unless this is all about liberals being too politically correct or something.

I pointed out that he died more than 40 years ago because a liberal in Frost's time isn't necessarily the same as liberals we have now.
 
Jesus was the ultimate conservative then I guess ;)
 
The quote has little basis in reality. I'm still trying to figure out why you would even consider it sig. worthy, let alone "replacement for an actual argument against liberals" worthy.

The subject is, "What's a liberal?" It is merely a Frost quote about what he thought, I suppose. It is not about "sig. worthy."
 
The subject is, "What's a liberal?" It is merely a Frost quote about what he thought, I suppose. It is not about "sig. worthy."

True. But the quote is supposed to be derrogatory (perhaps only mildly) towards liberals, and it fails to actually point out what a liberal in today's era actually is.
 
A liberal is someone who desires change. So whether or not a person is liberal depends on the context.

My cynical definition of a liberal is someone who doesn't understand that if there are faults in a policy that this does not necessarily mean that said policy should be changed in a particular way or even to any other way.


For completeness sake...


A conservative is someone who desires to keep the status quo or maintain the past. So whether or not a person is a conservative depends on the context.

My cynical definition of a conservative is someone who doesn't understand that just because a policy exists that said policy is good or should be maintained.
 
Bonzo is the true prophet

mn_reagan_bonzo.jpg
 
I agree with these. Liberal is about favouring individual freedom, as opposed to authoritarianism. It's often wrongly conflated with things like a particular Liberal party, or libertarianism (which is a subset of liberalism).

I hear the word "liberal" most often by people trying to push a (usually authoritarian) point of view, and will try to paint anyone who disagrees with them as being "liberal", even if that's not true. It's common to throw a few strawman arguments about what liberals supposedly believe, too.

Keep in mind that in America, liberal has a different meaning than in most of the rest of the world--almost the opposite meaning, in fact. An American liberal would be called a social democrat, or something along those lines, anywhere else.
 
Back
Top Bottom