Why is everyone complaining about religion in civ4?

Robi D

Minister of (Dis)Order
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
3,066
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Religion is a significant influence in the world, and as far as i know everyone who's played civ has wanted it to be included in the game for that reason. Now that it going to be in civ4, no one seem happy about it, because its just a bunch of names with no special abilities or charcteristics, that firaxis have just done the PC thing. Personally think that's being a bit unfair, i don't believe that religion could have been incoporated into the game any better, and i'll give you the two major reasons why.

1) How do you put a value on spirituality?

A lot of people wanted different religions to have different qualities and charactersitics, but religion isn't physical, its spiritual, and essence of spiritual things can't be defined with physical values. A persons spiritual beliefs don't make them stronger or faster ect. it might make them feel that way, but thats a mental aspect of people. A persons menatality can affect their physical capabilities, people with a happy state of mind will do a job better than unhappy people, but that doesn't mean happy people have increased physical abilities because they are happy, it just means they are able to work closer to their potential. Religion and ones spiritual beliefs are one part of a persons mental state. If i was to change my religion today, would that make me a different person all of a sudden, no of course not, it wouldn't change one physical thing about me because its spiritual. Take for example mohummed ali, did changing his religious faith make him a better boxer, well yes and no. No, its didn't suddenly make his jabs faster or his hooks harder, but also yes because he felt his own spiritual beliefs were reflected in islam, changing to islam would have made him happier and therefore mentally stronger, which would make him a better boxer in that sense.

2) Religion is a very sensitive subject !

You just have to read some of the topics on the forum to see this, the fact that all religions will have missionaries upset people as in real life thats not the case. Now this is a minor thing as in the game there needs to be a physical means of spreading religion and migration isn't modelled in the game this was the chosen method, but it caused a major debate. Now if that caused a big debate, image the debate that would be caused by making a religion produce more happiness or more aggresive/militaristic. Its not an issue of PC here, but a fact of life, religion is a very personal thing, so people will take things about their religion personnally. And as i stated above, religion is spiritual, which makes it impossible to assign physical values. To try to assign physical values would be inviting mayhem as no one would agree and everyone would be upset.

Having said that, in civ 4 religion is more than just a name in the background. It opens up many more posibilities in the game, for instance it will be a factor in relations with other civs, which might start wars or help create alliances, as well as the line of sight bonus if your state religion is the same as that of cities in other civs, ect. Civ is successful because it offers a player choices and possibilites, so as i see, introducing religion and with it more choices and possiblities can only be a good thing.
 
Robi D said:
Religion is a significant influence in the world, and as far as i know everyone who's played civ has wanted it to be included in the game for that reason. Now that it going to be in civ4, no one seem happy about it, because its just a bunch of names with no special abilities or charcteristics, that firaxis have just done the PC thing. Personally think that's being a bit unfair, i don't believe that religion could not have been incoporated into the game any better, and i'll give you the two major reasons why.

1) How do you put a value on spirituality?

A lot of people wanted different religions to have different qualities and charactersitics, but religion isn't physical, its spiritual, and essence of spiritual things can't be defined with physical values. A persons spiritual beliefs don't make then stronger or faster ect. it might make them feel that way, but thats a mental aspect of people. A persons menatality can affect their physical capabilities, people with a happy state of mind will do a job better than unhappy people, but that doesn't mean happy people have increased physical abilities because they are happy, it just means they are able to work closer to their potential. Religion and ones spiritual beliefs are one part of a persons mental state. If i was to change my religion today, would that make me a different person all of a sudden, no of course not, it wouldn't change one physical thing about me because its spiritual. Take for example mohummed ali, did changing his religious faith make him a better boxer, well yes and no. No, its didn't suddenly make his jabs faster or his hooks harder, but also yes because he felt his own spiritual beliefs were relected in islam, changing to islam would have made him happier and therefore mentally stronger, which would make him a better boxer in that sense.

2) Religion is a very sensitive subject !

You just have to read some of the topics on the forum to see this, the fact that all religions will have missionaries upset people as in real life thats not the case. Now this is a minor thing as in the game there needs to be a physical means of spreading religion and migration isn't modelled in the game this was the chosen method, but it caused a major debate. Now if that caused a big debate, image the debate that would be caused by making a religion produce more happiness or more aggresive/militaristic. Its not an issue of PC here, but a fact of life, religion is a very personal thing, so people will take things about their religion personnally. And as i stated above, religion is spiritual, which makes it impossible to assign physical values. To try to assign physical values would be inviting mayhem as no one would agree and everyone would be upset.

Having said that, in civ 4 religion is more than just a name in the background. It opens up many more posibilities in the game, for instance it will be a factor in relations with other civs, which might start wars or help create alliances, as well as the line of sight bonus if your state religion is the same as that of cities in other civs, ect. Civ is successful because it offers a player choices and possibilites, so as i see, introducing religion and with it more choices and possiblities can only be a good thing.
:goodjob: :goodjob: :goodjob:

Good job.
 
Not everyone is complaining about religion.

For every person who starts a thread annoying us about not having x religion or a religion having missionaries, or religions having traits; you will see many people telling them to pull their head in.

Its just the noisy minority that is driving everyone mad :crazyeye:
 
Meleager said:
Not everyone is complaining about religion.

For every person who starts a thread annoying us about not having x religion or a religion having missionaries, or religions having traits; you will see many people telling them to pull their head in.

Its just the noisy minority that is driving everyone mad :crazyeye:


Fair enough, i over generalised the statement, which is my bad. In hindsight i should have worded it "Why are SO MANY people complaining about religion in civ4".
 
I wasn't trying to be nick-picky. I just thought I would point out the rest of us.
 
Oh, just for the record-though I would love to see more religions in the game, and religions with traits (as anyone who 'knows' me will realise ;)!) It doesn't bother me that religions are going to be Vanilla when Civ4 initially comes out. For me, all of these extra bells and whistles can wait-I am just stoked that religions are in this time around. I just think that even in Vanilla form, this new element will add heaps to the game-play.

Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.
 
and stopped getting mad about the unit names, everyone knows what a missionary is so its an easy way to describe the unit ITS JUST A GAME PEOPLE
 
I'm not saying people are wrong to want religious traits, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Civ4 is suppose to be fully moddable so those people will be able to put in religous traits into their game, although i still think it not possible to put a physical value on spirituality, that would be their choice. However to put triats into the game initially would be folly for the reasons i stated above. As to the question of more than 7 religions, i think they chose 7 for balance reasons as their are only 18 civs in the game.
 
Robi, you misunderstand me. I agree with you that some people are just being downright ridiculous in their complaints regarding religion-what with their 'Judaism doesn't have Missionaries' and so on and so forth. I also agree that you can't place a value on sprituality, or implement religion in a way that is going to please everyone. I just think its important to distinguish between complaining and making suggestions for possible future additions/modifications to religion. As I said in my previous post, I think they were 100% correct to take a KISS approach to religion in this particular release-but with hopes that they will add more in future expansions (hint, hint ;) ).

Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.
 
I'm simply complaining because the "top 7" aren't even the top 7. It makes little sense. Not to mention them totally simplifying it that all religions have thing that they shouldn't have. I just don't see why they couldn't have made it like Civics. If government can be molded into how we want, why can't our Civ's spiritual way of thinking?

It matters not anyway. With the modding options, I can easily rename the religions to what they really should be. Winner, me.
 
Aussie_Lurker said:
Robi, you misunderstand me. I agree with you that some people are just being downright ridiculous in their complaints regarding religion-what with their 'Judaism doesn't have Missionaries' and so on and so forth. I also agree that you can't place a value on sprituality, or implement religion in a way that is going to please everyone. I just think its important to distinguish between complaining and making suggestions for possible future additions/modifications to religion. As I said in my previous post, I think they were 100% correct to take a KISS approach to religion in this particular release-but with hopes that they will add more in future expansions (hint, hint ;) ).

Yours,
Aussie_Lurker.

My post wasn't directed at your one so to speak, but reading it reminded of a point i missed in my original post, that those who don't like the way its done will be able to mod it to their taste.

As for future releases, i'd have to see how civ4 plays before making a judgement on improving on the religous aspect of the game, however their are a lot of area of the world they haven't touched upon yet(including civ4)!!
 
Ranbir said:
I'm simply complaining because the "top 7" aren't even the top 7. It makes little sense. Not to mention them totally simplifying it that all religions have thing that they shouldn't have. I just don't see why they couldn't have made it like Civics. If government can be molded into how we want, why can't our Civ's spiritual way of thinking?

It matters not anyway. With the modding options, I can easily rename the religions to what they really should be. Winner, me.

im glad you added that last couple sentences...you were doing what the others were gripping about. ;) ..not that its wrong..i just think you would have drawn lots of fire

as far as my opinions...like aussie lurker said..there are things that i would like to see..but what i most wanted, a repersentation, is in fact there. i see civ as a game with endless possibilities. i can wait for all of my features...the new ones coming on civ4 ought to keep me content , and if they dont, gawd help them(owner of everything from civ dos to conquests)
 
I'm happy with it... it's basic yet gives the game another dimension. I'd love more depth in religion, but for a company such as Firaxis who want their game to appeal to such a large community i understand that being a sensitive issue this may not be possible right now.
 
Back
Top Bottom