World!!!(our days)
- Thread starter Leox
- Start date
timberwoolf
Warlord
- Joined
- May 4, 2003
- Messages
- 204
Could you add some explanations or screen shots?!
Justice831
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 8
OK,
1.America has no Active Battleships, replace them with AEGIS cruisers.
2.Africa has virtualy no military. In real life they have like 1 ship!
They also have no cruise missiles and very little soldiers.
3.Canada has no military. They have about 2 Jet Fighters in real life. 1 Mech Infantry and an Infantry! No cruise missiles!
4.Israel has conquered the entire Arab world...you wish!
5.Mongolia is way too big and it has absolutely NO military! Nothing, it should be just an empty city!!!
6.many cities are spelled wrong.
7.Soon you shall see how its done...
1.America has no Active Battleships, replace them with AEGIS cruisers.
2.Africa has virtualy no military. In real life they have like 1 ship!
They also have no cruise missiles and very little soldiers.
3.Canada has no military. They have about 2 Jet Fighters in real life. 1 Mech Infantry and an Infantry! No cruise missiles!
4.Israel has conquered the entire Arab world...you wish!
5.Mongolia is way too big and it has absolutely NO military! Nothing, it should be just an empty city!!!
6.many cities are spelled wrong.
7.Soon you shall see how its done...
Procifica
ACW Scenario Creator
This is just too easy.....snsfro, I suggest before posting you consult an atlas and some textbooks.
1) Nigeria (in Africa) has one of the largest armies in the world. At one time it numbered over 250,000 men on active duty. Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and South Africa are other nations with good-sized armies. Liberia is #2 on the world's list of ships registered under its name...while this doesn't count as a navy, its still ships. Egypt and Libya both have small navies.
2) Egypt and Libya both have missile technology, as does South Africa.
3) Canada does have a small modern military. How do you know how much of each type of unit they have in real life, if you don't know their representative scale in the scenario?
4) Mongolia is a rather large country, situated between Russia and China. While its population is very small (something like 2.5 million I believe), it does have a small military and its backed by Russia.
5) There is no way Israel could conquer the Arab world on its own, sheer numbers would overwhelm them.
6) America should be stronger than any other nation, that's the current reality. I'm assuming this is meant to take place around the present day.
1) Nigeria (in Africa) has one of the largest armies in the world. At one time it numbered over 250,000 men on active duty. Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and South Africa are other nations with good-sized armies. Liberia is #2 on the world's list of ships registered under its name...while this doesn't count as a navy, its still ships. Egypt and Libya both have small navies.
2) Egypt and Libya both have missile technology, as does South Africa.
3) Canada does have a small modern military. How do you know how much of each type of unit they have in real life, if you don't know their representative scale in the scenario?
4) Mongolia is a rather large country, situated between Russia and China. While its population is very small (something like 2.5 million I believe), it does have a small military and its backed by Russia.
5) There is no way Israel could conquer the Arab world on its own, sheer numbers would overwhelm them.
6) America should be stronger than any other nation, that's the current reality. I'm assuming this is meant to take place around the present day.
No you are wrong Procifica. I suggest you consult
The Military Balance 2002-2003. The International
Institute for Strategic Studies.
Nigeria 4+ divisions (MBT: 50 T-55 and 150 Vickers Mk 3)62 000 men.
Navy: 1 Frigate Air Force: 86 cbt ac.
"250 000 men". I suppose you refer to the Biafra-conflict
30 years ago. Out of these 250 000 only 40 000 were
in combat formations, the rest logistics forces.
Canadian Army: 1 mech inf div. (MBT 114 Leopard)
Navy: 2 subs, 4 Destroyers and 12 Frigates.
Air Force: 140 combat aircraft.
"no way Israel could conquer the Arab world on its own".
After mob. Israel have 16 divisions (10 of these armd.)
(MBT 3 750!)
Sure Israels high-quality forces can defeat and occupy
the Arab world, but why should they?
Rocoteh
The Military Balance 2002-2003. The International
Institute for Strategic Studies.
Nigeria 4+ divisions (MBT: 50 T-55 and 150 Vickers Mk 3)62 000 men.
Navy: 1 Frigate Air Force: 86 cbt ac.
"250 000 men". I suppose you refer to the Biafra-conflict
30 years ago. Out of these 250 000 only 40 000 were
in combat formations, the rest logistics forces.
Canadian Army: 1 mech inf div. (MBT 114 Leopard)
Navy: 2 subs, 4 Destroyers and 12 Frigates.
Air Force: 140 combat aircraft.
"no way Israel could conquer the Arab world on its own".
After mob. Israel have 16 divisions (10 of these armd.)
(MBT 3 750!)
Sure Israels high-quality forces can defeat and occupy
the Arab world, but why should they?
Rocoteh
Procifica
ACW Scenario Creator
I actually wasn't complaining about leox really.
Quote: At one time it numbered over 250,000 men on active duty.
Yes, I was referring to the Biafra conflict when I quoted that figure. Nigeria still is the major West African military power, and they have VAST reserves of potential manpower (over 100 million population). If you count their reserves, their army is pretty large.
Quote: Canadian Army: 1 mech inf div. (MBT 114 Leopard)
Navy: 2 subs, 4 Destroyers and 12 Frigates.
Air Force: 140 combat aircraft.
Yes, as I said, a small modern military. The USA techically only has like what, 10 divisions or so? (plus MANY smaller formations detached)
After mobilization Syria, Egypt, Iran, Libya, Saudi Arabia, etc. could easily mobilize much much more than 16 divisions between them. In the Persian Gulf War Syria had over 25,000 on its border with Iraq alone, Egypt had 60,000 deployed, Saudi Arabia over 110,000. If Turkey is included within all this, that's 500,000 men for them alone (NATO'S second largest army I believe). While Israel has quality, I doubt they could defeat all of the Arab nations at once. Egypt and Syria did do a pretty good job in the Yom Kippur War of 1973, and that's just 2 nations (though Israel has grown even more modern in their military).
Considering I was reciting things which I've read in the past (some 5+ years ago when I was in school), I don't think I was too far off from being completely "accurate".
Quote: At one time it numbered over 250,000 men on active duty.
Yes, I was referring to the Biafra conflict when I quoted that figure. Nigeria still is the major West African military power, and they have VAST reserves of potential manpower (over 100 million population). If you count their reserves, their army is pretty large.
Quote: Canadian Army: 1 mech inf div. (MBT 114 Leopard)
Navy: 2 subs, 4 Destroyers and 12 Frigates.
Air Force: 140 combat aircraft.
Yes, as I said, a small modern military. The USA techically only has like what, 10 divisions or so? (plus MANY smaller formations detached)
After mobilization Syria, Egypt, Iran, Libya, Saudi Arabia, etc. could easily mobilize much much more than 16 divisions between them. In the Persian Gulf War Syria had over 25,000 on its border with Iraq alone, Egypt had 60,000 deployed, Saudi Arabia over 110,000. If Turkey is included within all this, that's 500,000 men for them alone (NATO'S second largest army I believe). While Israel has quality, I doubt they could defeat all of the Arab nations at once. Egypt and Syria did do a pretty good job in the Yom Kippur War of 1973, and that's just 2 nations (though Israel has grown even more modern in their military).
Considering I was reciting things which I've read in the past (some 5+ years ago when I was in school), I don't think I was too far off from being completely "accurate".
Procifica,
I give you the last words since this will be my last comment
in this thread. I must add that you are always acting
correct in the forums and I have never seen you making
personal attacks.
sween32,
I think Leox can speak for himself.
If you continue to act on your juvenile level, calling me "jerk"
or other insults you can come up with, I will not respond
in the future.
Period!!!
Rocoteh
I give you the last words since this will be my last comment
in this thread. I must add that you are always acting
correct in the forums and I have never seen you making
personal attacks.
sween32,
I think Leox can speak for himself.
If you continue to act on your juvenile level, calling me "jerk"
or other insults you can come up with, I will not respond
in the future.
Period!!!
Rocoteh
i didn't say you were a jerk, i said it makes you look like one when you get into the whole "i suggest you consult this and that because you're wrong and i'm right". thank you for helping out this guy, but from personal experience that way of giving feedback will turn off the creater from finishing, whether it be directed towards him or somebody else trying to help (likein this case). besides, my original comment was blown way out of proportion. forget about it.
