I was playing my first map at immortal for the Greeks on great plains (pangea) large/epic/raging barbs, as I have cleared previous difficulties fairly easily.
I have played Civilizations before, but I am by no means a pro.
Being Greek I got Companion Cavalry fairly quickly, and went with Meritocracy/Freedom so I can ICS while my horses harass my neighbors. The problem though is choice - since I would only have a limited amount of time before my CC would become obsolete, and I had 9 civilization to clear (or at least cripple), I was generally going for the closest/highest score targets first.
Romans died first when Songhai invited me and the Mongols to swarm them so it was a no-brainer (I got the capital, and mongol took the last city). Then with no more offers I reduced the Chinese, Indians and Arabs to 1 city.
While that was going on Mongols overtook me in army (I had army lead at some point, but stopped building troops after 7 horseman and a couple early infantry) and REXed even harder than I did.
Figuring that I didn't want to find Genghis in the Middle Ages with his Khan (I also had an RA with him and he was my best trading partner), I attacked Songhai instead and conquered them quickly which is when Mongols attacked me and so far rolled over my distant puppets and city - states within 3-4 turns.
The point of this post is that Mongols turned out to be far more powerful than all the 5 civilizations I conquered combined (as they have like a dozen horseman who raped all my allies and healthy numbers of infantry), so in hindsight I should have wiped out the golden horde earlier.
Which civs should I rush first (given the choice) considering I usually go for the domination victory (or maybe spaceship for consolation)?
Sounds like most people hate Bismark/Alexander/Caesar... I definitely hate the Mongols now, and Gandhi would have probably been pretty safe lol...
Is there any order you would go in when rushing/puppetting - warmonger civs/ or closest civs/ or strongest army civ / tactical (horse strong civs need to die first in open terrain; sword strong in hard terrain)?
p.s. Is large map simply too large? I noticed that all the 'public' games take place on either standard or small, which I found odd since I loved playing Large/Huge maps in Civ3 and Civ4 - it felt so much more Epic and history like.
However playing this map, I am clearing territory far faster then I can fill it with cities. I end up taking over civilizations (that have 5-10 cities), and burning all but 1 or 2 of their cities to the ground (except capitol/wonder/luxuries), and I can't pump out settlers/coliseums nearly fast enough... So most of the map is a barren wasteland of city ruins...
And frankly neither I nor Genghis Khan have a good reason to go to war since we both have plenty of expansion room to last us to the 3000AD... We just like the mindless slaughter I guess.
I have played Civilizations before, but I am by no means a pro.
Being Greek I got Companion Cavalry fairly quickly, and went with Meritocracy/Freedom so I can ICS while my horses harass my neighbors. The problem though is choice - since I would only have a limited amount of time before my CC would become obsolete, and I had 9 civilization to clear (or at least cripple), I was generally going for the closest/highest score targets first.
Romans died first when Songhai invited me and the Mongols to swarm them so it was a no-brainer (I got the capital, and mongol took the last city). Then with no more offers I reduced the Chinese, Indians and Arabs to 1 city.
While that was going on Mongols overtook me in army (I had army lead at some point, but stopped building troops after 7 horseman and a couple early infantry) and REXed even harder than I did.
Figuring that I didn't want to find Genghis in the Middle Ages with his Khan (I also had an RA with him and he was my best trading partner), I attacked Songhai instead and conquered them quickly which is when Mongols attacked me and so far rolled over my distant puppets and city - states within 3-4 turns.
The point of this post is that Mongols turned out to be far more powerful than all the 5 civilizations I conquered combined (as they have like a dozen horseman who raped all my allies and healthy numbers of infantry), so in hindsight I should have wiped out the golden horde earlier.
Which civs should I rush first (given the choice) considering I usually go for the domination victory (or maybe spaceship for consolation)?
Sounds like most people hate Bismark/Alexander/Caesar... I definitely hate the Mongols now, and Gandhi would have probably been pretty safe lol...
Is there any order you would go in when rushing/puppetting - warmonger civs/ or closest civs/ or strongest army civ / tactical (horse strong civs need to die first in open terrain; sword strong in hard terrain)?
p.s. Is large map simply too large? I noticed that all the 'public' games take place on either standard or small, which I found odd since I loved playing Large/Huge maps in Civ3 and Civ4 - it felt so much more Epic and history like.
However playing this map, I am clearing territory far faster then I can fill it with cities. I end up taking over civilizations (that have 5-10 cities), and burning all but 1 or 2 of their cities to the ground (except capitol/wonder/luxuries), and I can't pump out settlers/coliseums nearly fast enough... So most of the map is a barren wasteland of city ruins...
And frankly neither I nor Genghis Khan have a good reason to go to war since we both have plenty of expansion room to last us to the 3000AD... We just like the mindless slaughter I guess.