Would you have sex with a complete stranger?

Would you have sex with a complete stranger?

  • Yes

    Votes: 112 65.1%
  • No

    Votes: 60 34.9%

  • Total voters
    172
Status
Not open for further replies.
fe3333au said:
Can you honestly believe stats created by these guyz

Mission Statement : Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute - a think tank - whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
Clearly they're biased, but find me a researcher of this sort of thing who isn't. You can't invalidate their claims just because they're incredibly biased as long as their research is legitimate.
 
stormbind said:
The number of STD-infected High School teens in the USA is rising each year. I do not remember the percentage but it is pretty high.
i know that, thay will have to show me a recent test
 
when I am single, and I meet a guy at the Club that I really like, I will go home with him. as long as we are safe and both doing it for the same reasons(if he is all depressed about breaking up with his girlfriend than I wont, thats not fait to him)
 
Keirador said:
My most practical reasoning would be that to do so would almost certainly give me diseases.
You can also get diseases from girls that look 'conservative' you know: do you know with whom they were before they met you? Did you do a disease-test on her before sleeping with her? Don't you intend to wear a condom, even if it's not 100% safe?
Keirador said:
The girl is obviously a bit of a whore, so even with a condom at the very least I could expect to get some form of HPV.
'It ain't necessarily so!' Look, I've met girls so 'offensive' that I couldn't believe at first they didn't want a one-night-stand, and met girls that looked 'fine-ladies' that turned out to be nymphs!
Keirador said:
I already have skin cancer, no need for genital cancer too.
I'm sorry to hear that: best wishes to you.
Keirador said:
Also, I must bear in mind my future happiness. The higher your number of pre-marital sexual relations, the higher probability of divorce.
Allow me to disagree on this: the harsh truth is that the less sexual relations you have, the more the chances to get divorced later on, leaving your wife and family at age 50, for a 2m tall hot babe from Russia(and you turn out broke!)
On the other hand, of course there're people that can be very happy together and have a wonderful marriage and none of them cheat the other throught their lives.

Anyway, with all due respect, I'm not telling you that going with strangers is the right thing for *YOU*, personally, to do, because every personality is different.
 
1-2 hours is way to fast for me. I like to know someone a little better.

Most of my friends who do/did that often rarely saw the person again (and sometimes barely remembered the night as they were drunk), where I like there to be a continuing relationship, even if we both agree it is only physical.
 
Keirador said:
The risk of divorce after living together is 40 to 85% higher than the risk of divorce after not living together. In other words, those who live together before marriage are almost twice as likely to divorce than those who did not live together. (Bumpass & Sweet 1995; Hall & Zhao 1995; Bracher, Santow, Morgan & Russell 1993; DeMaris & Rao 1992 and Glen 1990).
Did those studies check for cultural factors? It seems intuitively right that communities that expect couples not to cohabit before marriage would tend to be ones that look disapprovingly on divorce.

(My personal theory on the rise of divorce is simple; the main cause is the improving social acceptability of it.)

Also, living together seems like a poor proxy for pre-marital sex. Here, at least, it would be considered odd if a non-cohabiting couple did not have sex.
 
King Alexander said:
Allow me to disagree on this: the harsh truth is that the less sexual relations you have, the more the chances to get divorced later on, leaving your wife and family at age 50, for a 2m tall hot babe from Russia(and you turn out broke!)
On the other hand, of course there're people that can be very happy together and have a wonderful marriage and none of them cheat the other throught their lives.

Anyway, with all due respect, I'm not telling you that going with strangers is the right thing for *YOU*, personally, to do, because every personality is different.
I have to disagree about abstaining from sex untill marrage, it does not lead to divoirce later in life. Pre-marital sex leads to divorce later in life. Personaly, I do not want to lose my virginity to a girl who will cheat on me. I am personaly strict about waiting untill after marrage to engage in sex.
 
CivGeneral said:
I have to disagree about abstaining from sex untill marrage, it does not lead to divoirce later in life. Pre-marital sex leads to divorce later in life. Personaly, I do not want to lose my virginity to a girl who will cheat on me. I am personaly strict about waiting untill after marrage to engage in sex.
Trust me, we aren't living 50 years ago that women/men stayed together for the sake of their kids, despite if their marriage was awful.

At least, when you find a person that you think "this IS the person for me", you could, with time, make love with her -- don't you think it's the best? If you find out later on that you don't go very well with each other, it wouldn't be too late.
I'm not forcing you to be in hurry: do it your way, but try to have a complete relationship before marriage(at SOME point), because, for example, that way you'll find out if you can control yourself as before with other 'temptations'.

If your girl would love you as much as you would, I don't think she'd cheating on you(although things aren't always as we want to :crazyeye: ).
 
No.

Heh, right now it's 54-29 in favor of doing it. It shows how horny modern society has become. :p

EDIT:
I have to disagree about abstaining from sex untill marrage, it does not lead to divoirce later in life. Pre-marital sex leads to divorce later in life. Personaly, I do not want to lose my virginity to a girl who will cheat on me. I am personaly strict about waiting untill after marrage to engage in sex.

CivGeneral has morals? :eek: :lol:
 
Nope. I wouldn't have sex with anyone until I'm at least in my college years... even then, I'd be hesitant, and of course it would depend on the situation - they'd have to be female (and human :)), reasonably attractive, willing, not too far from "normal" in terms of physical disabilities/abnormalities and mental stability, within maybe 5-10 years of my age (depending at what age that places them), not have any severe contagious diseases, and finally, they couldn't have done anything within that hour or two that I'd known them that severely annoyed/insulted me, or revealed them to be a bad person (i.e. they were cheating on someone in having sex with me, they were a convicted felon, etc.). Oh, and I definitely wouldn't if I already had a girlfriend/significant other of my own.

[edit]Of course I forgot that I wouldn't do it if one of us didn't have some sort of reliable birth control.[/edit]
 
King Alexander said:
At least, when you find a person that you think "this IS the person for me", you could, with time, make love with her -- don't you think it's the best? If you find out later on that you don't go very well with each other, it wouldn't be too late. I'm not forcing you to be in hurry: do it your way, but try to have a complete relationship before marriage(at SOME point), because, for example, that way you'll find out if you can control yourself as before with other 'temptations'.
I just feel that waiting untill marrage is better for me, though I do have sexual tensons built up. I chose to wait untill marrage because I was never a super stud in high school and was never lucky (I only had 2 GFs in HS) :rolleyes:.

GrandAdmiral said:
The Major isn't.
Were talking about Real Life realities, not fictional :p.
 
Since I don't submit to females many selfish demands, I don't usually hold onto relationships very long, so I tend to go for the occasional one night stand over the frequent but costly.

I always use protection 'though (a stack hat, incase we fall off the table)
 
CivGeneral said:
I just feel that waiting untill marrage is better for me, though I do have sexual tensons built up. I chose to wait untill marrage because I was never a super stud in high school and was never lucky (I only had 2 GFs in HS) :rolleyes:.
Ok, as you wish.. life is upredictable you know, and things can go either way, any time, so, you could meet your girlfriend even tomorrow :)
 
Of course! Not after five minutes, but definitely after an hour or two. First, I'd have to call my GF to cancel our strategic alliance and negotiate a cease fire though. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom