Thanks Xeo, Windows updates are allways a good source to find new problems
Dan:
2) If you hadnt "claimed" first slot, you would still be moving after me. Therefor I didnt double move. You did, twice actually. Offcourse you are going to claim that you didnt... or you didnt get any advantage... Well guess what ? You did get one cause you were able to land the units !
It is not only my claim that says you took advantage, it is a recorded fact. You made the 2 moves to make sure your units landed, period.
3) Yes the fog DM you made mattered but it is still you that made it. That is exactly my point. Since you made that DM, you now feel like I made a DM ... which I didnt ...
Me, you, PTPan... That is the way it was.... and should have been. If we had played the turn concerned in that exact order (as it should have been) I would have blocked that galley.
Your "breaking" DM the turn before now causes all this problems, cause you feel abused. While you have nothing to point there.
Maybe it is my fault for not reporting your first DM. But as we allready established nothing real seemed to have happened... and nothing did happen. If only we had kept to Me, You, PTpan... But no... You had to make sure your units landed! => i.e. take advantage by going last and first.
All others do not make any difference you DM, me DM what ever. ONLY 1 turn it really matters as something happened in that turn. YOUR DM.
Me, You, PTPan, Me, You, PTPan, etc. You broke this, but you are not willing to admitt to it. Whats more you dont even seem to be willing to accept this bare bone naked fact.
It is not compensation because of several reasons
1) You units should not have been there.
2) I whipped some cities to make sure you could do minimum damage (i.e. the walls in Bagdad)
3) You knowingly and conciously broke the rule.
4) In the end you found a forrest hill to sit pretty on. Where you should have been was a bare dessert hill (if you had landed at all), this difference made you stronger on defence. Costing me more units than it should have to remove your units.
. I'd like to point out one basic principle that should be honored in a pitboss game where double moves are forbidden: DOUBLE MOVES (that give irreversible advantage) MUST BE FORBIDDEN WHETHER THEY ARE VISIBLE OR MADE BEHIND FOG OF WAR.
. It was all the same whether I would have raised the question in 1100 AD or namliaM in 1110 AD as he did. The difference between my and namliaM's double move was that namliaM made it in FoW (out of visibility range of anyone else) and I made my double move from FoW into visibility. And yes yes, I know namliaM still thinks there was some kind of strict order of moves although anyone can see (now afterwords) from the log that it just was not true.
Very strange.
