We definitely need words better than 'antivax'.
The antivax crowd was worried about ADE, spike proteins in the plasma, vaccinating during a pandemic selecting for variants, vaccines causing undisclosed disease. Then there's the more extreme crowd that was talking about spike protein shedding, 5G signals invading your lipids, and it being a gene therapy. There's the crowd with legitimate concerns that actually just don't know the research and then there's the nutbar crowd.
I wouldn't put the suspicion (the study isn't peer-reviewed yet, iirc) that natural infection compares to vaccination when it comes to future infections as 'antivax'. It's a piece of science that then has sociological implications.
The antivax crowd was worried about ADE, spike proteins in the plasma, vaccinating during a pandemic selecting for variants, vaccines causing undisclosed disease. Then there's the more extreme crowd that was talking about spike protein shedding, 5G signals invading your lipids, and it being a gene therapy. There's the crowd with legitimate concerns that actually just don't know the research and then there's the nutbar crowd.
I wouldn't put the suspicion (the study isn't peer-reviewed yet, iirc) that natural infection compares to vaccination when it comes to future infections as 'antivax'. It's a piece of science that then has sociological implications.
Last edited: