Coronavirus: Free the Jab!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Samson

Deity
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
17,314
Location
Cambridge
Coronavirus
Coronavirus 2
Coronavirus 3
Coronavirus 4
Coronavirus E
Coronavirus: awaiting for the next wave
COVID - A light on the horizon?

If I get to start the tread, I shall make the point that the most important thing for everyone is for everyone to get the jab. For that to happen, we need to not restrict production based in intellectual property.

I may write more here later, but for the minute I will leave it to others to speak for me:

Nature

It’s time to consider a patent reprieve for COVID vaccines
The pandemic is not a competition between companies and will not end without more-equal distribution of coronavirus vaccines.
Lancet


A step backwards in the fight against global vaccine inequities
MSF

Ahead of talks at the WTO on patents on COVID-19 tools, a small number of countries continue to block a waiver that would open up access to these tools during the pandemic.​
 
we need to not restrict production based in intellectual property.
Ah, yes, that.
The world needs a patent waiver on Covid vaccines. Why is the UK blocking it?
Letting countries create their own generic versions of the jabs is the best way to combat the spread of vaccine-resistant variants

Spoiler :
Last year the British government made a series of mistakes in its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. As countries from Thailand to the US battle another wave of infections driven by more virulent strains, the UK risks making another historic mistake that could scupper our chance to end this pandemic.

Because coronavirus cases continue to rise worldwide, the risk of vaccine-resistant variants is increasing. Public health voices have already warned that if we don’t rapidly vaccinate the world’s population, our current generation of Covid-19 vaccines could be rendered ineffective within a year. The need for a rapid, global vaccination rollout is clear and urgent.

Pandemics are, by definition, global health crises. No matter how high our vaccination rate may be, no matter what restrictions we place on travel, we will not be safe from Covid-19 until we have suppressed the virus across the globe. As things stand, many countries in the southern hemisphere may not manage to achieve widespread vaccination until 2024. This long delay puts us all at risk.

Wealthy countries such as the UK have bought enough vaccinations for our populations almost three times over. The UK is, ministers say, supporting immunisation in low-income countries through Covax, a global vaccine procurement scheme. But the programme aims only to vaccinate 20% of the populations of recipient countries this year.

That does not begin to approach the threshold needed for population immunity. And it will, therefore, not prevent the risk of dangerous mutations. The approach of Covax is based on charitable principles. Commendable as the programme is, it is simply not capable of moving fast enough to bring this pandemic to an end. That is, in part, because of a shortfall in funding. But even with more funding, there are simply not enough doses being produced or planned for the entire world.

Production is being constrained because pharmaceutical companies have refused to share their vaccine technology, and intellectual property rules prevent countries from creating their own generic versions of the jabs. This means we are restricted to the supply chains of the patent-holder company. Because of this impediment, we are using just a fraction of the world’s potential global vaccine manufacturing capacity.

More than 100 nations, led by India and South Africa, are pushing to temporarily suspend patent rules at the World Trade Organization during this pandemic. But the move has been blocked by a small number of countries, including the UK and the US, as well as by the EU.

Throughout this pandemic, Independent Sage has sought to guide the government and act as a non-party political voice for sound population health policy. Our remit would not usually extend to matters of international trade. But in this case the risk to public health is clear.

By helping block a patent waiver, the UK government is stifling vaccine production, which means many countries will wait years for sufficient doses. That risks letting the virus run rampant, leading to new variants and putting our own vaccination programme in jeopardy. It would be a reckless act of self-mutilation.

At an Independent Sage briefing on Friday, we heard from Global Justice Now, an NGO that has been leading calls for a “people’s vaccine” approach. This would enable the production of open-licence Covid-19 vaccines that are available to everyone, everywhere, regardless of income, status, or background.

This week former world leaders across countries and political traditions called on President Biden to back a waiver on intellectual property right rules for Covid vaccines. In the US, the Biden administration is considering how it might meet these demands, including dropping its opposition to a patent waiver.

The British government should urgently review its opposition. We, across the UK, are cautiously moving towards reducing coronavirus restrictions and assisting the economy to recover. All of that could be lost if highly infectious, vaccine-resistant variants emerge – a “people’s vaccine” is the surest, fastest way to avoid the risk of what might be a devastating development.

In the months and years ahead, there is a risk that we will see this moment much as we now view the wasted months of last summer or the weeks leading up to Christmas 2020 – a missed opportunity to get this virus under control. The risks of this mistake could be far greater still.

Gabriel Scally is visiting professor of public health at the University of Bristol and a member of the Independent Sage committee​
 
The latest instalment of the Argentine tragicomic saga, started only last Wednesday, reaches a new stage.

On Friday, ‘president’ Alberto Fernández and Buenos Aires City mayor Horacio Rodríguez Larreta met in a private meeting. As they had both promised, neither budged.
The ‘president’ struck the first mediatic blow by holding his own press conference in which he stated ‘do as I say, and if you don't like it better go to the courts’ (literally).
The mayor (in his own press conference as well) requested the courts to step in; outside the city proper (i.e. the province around it) opposition mayors did the same.
People gathered for a special demonstration before the Education Ministry as well as one at the ‘president's‘ state-owned residence.
Restaurant owners refused to close after 7 p.m. as ordered even in the face of fines and other punishments.

On Saturday there was yet another set of again numerous street demonstrations.

Today (Sunday for a minute or two yet ;)) a court of appeal issued a temporary ruling that orders schools to remain open within the city of Buenos Aires proper. On the other side of the border (a street or a small river depending on the area), i.e. the Province of Buenos Aires, classes will not continue. Well… tomorrow there will be a symbolic hug of schools and then a march towards the ‘president's’ residence. Private schools have stated that they shall remain open. The governor of the province has stated that subsidies and other benefits will be withheld from any and all schools that open.
Right after the ruling for the city was issued, Peronist-controlled trade unions (loyal to the ‘president’) have called for a teachers' strike wherever the court order is applied. They explicitly stated on a radio interview that this was not based on any medical advice or knowledge but because they felt the executive must be obeyed (screw checks and balances, court orders, (lack of) congressional oversight, etc.) and this must be enforced at any costs.


Even Francesco Salvi and Andrea Camilleri together wouldn't be able to write a parody of this.

Edit: on the stroke of midnight I must add that we're hitting a monthly inflation rate of 4.8% and still rising, thanks to the ‘president’ freezing the economy and doubling the amount of money in circulation. :faint:
 
I'm getting my first dose tomorrow afternoon. The pharmacy has been diligent about sending email reminders.

London Drugs (where I tried to book, as I have about $25 in gift cards and discounts there that can only be used in-person and I figured I'd pick up some groceries - as they do have a grocery section) snottily informed me in March that they had no available appointments even though they were listed on the government's website, and that I should "call 811". Yeah, right - call the same line that tens of thousands of others are trying to call to book appointments, testing, and calling for non-covid reasons... I'd still be on the phone.

A few days ago they sent me an email inviting me to book my appointment. I told them off via the customer service 'contact us' link, informing them of the local pharmacy's rudeness last month and that I'd booked with one of their competitors.

Their reply: We're sorry you had that experience and we see that appointments aren't available in your city anyway.
 
Borders open all across Australia and also with New Zealand as of today. No notable hotel quarantine leaks in a while. Been over a year since my territory had a case with an unknown origin.

Not much vaccine yet tho. Tough when you're not a primary manufacturer.
 
Last edited:
Hm. I had to fill out an email "survey" to determine if they'd let me into the pharmacy tomorrow.

Now they say I have to check in and they'll text or email me when they're ready - after I get there.

How do they expect to text or email me when I don't own a phone that's not a landline and I won't be dragging my computer with me to the pharmacy? I already told them I don't own a cellphone.

I'm going to have to phone about that and if it turns out this is a dealbreaker, I'll have to start all over to book an appointment.

If this happens, my next step will be to contact the CBC reporter who's been asking for people's stories about their experiences. Denying someone a shot just for not owning a cellphone and therefore not being able to be texted or emailed when it's just as easy to shout across the room at me (they're wearing a mask so wtf is the problem?) would not be great PR for this pharmacy.
 
A rather public display of issues with AZ?


Afaik this fainting (nasty fall too...) happened in a press conference about the halting of use of AZ vaccine by Denmark. The official fainted, for unknown reasons (I assume she didn't take the vaccine :) ).

Meanwhile, the ridiculous handling of the pandemic continues in Greece, where it seems that the citizens are to see measures lifted (apart from masks, which are set to remain) only when the tourists arrive. Why pretend the locals actually matter; despite the fact tourists don't vote.
 
Okay, it seems that blather about texting/emailing at the pharmacy isn't the way they actually do it, and they blamed the email service they're using.

It's still aggravatingly stressful to think that you've got barriers to this.

I went, got the vaccine, and they told me to wait 2 weeks because it doesn't work right away.

Thanks, but I passed Biology 30, 40 years ago... (but I guess there are a lot of people who don't know that vaccines take time to kick in)

So I'm expecting my arm to be sore, there should be some fatigue, they warned of the chance of fever, and said if I have pain, to take Tylenol.

We shall see. What matters is getting my daily 500 words for NaNoWriMo and keeping the cat fed and watered and my daily insulin. The rest is gravy.
 
The decisions over suspending vaccines are rooted in politics, not science. The scientific facts are not changing day to day - the verdict is there is an extremely rare cases a blood clotting side effect from the adenovirus based vaccines. Politicians are flailing around trying to figure out how to handle that, given that most of the general public is terrible at evaluating risk. People will be uneasy about a one in a million risk from a vaccine, while not even considering the risk from getting in a car and driving to get it. As for the vaccine testing and evaluation, the largest phase three trials were about 50,000 people. They were never going to pick up any effect so rare that it only shows up in less than 1 in 100,000 cases. That isn't from the vaccines being "hastily rushed" - no drug trial in history has been large enough to catch a side effect that rare. We could have had the longest, slowest and most detailed testing in history - and it still wouldn't have spotted any blood clotting issues until it went to full scale deployment.

@MrCynical - Just wanted to let you know I shared your post with a public health professional I know that was struggling to explain the pause to people and she really appreciated your thoughts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom