Transitional forms don't exist, Eohippus doesn't really work out for evolutionists, and polystrate fossils don't really help your case either. And even get me started on the living fossils or the fossil anomalies... The list goes on and on. Whine about it as much as you want, but the discussion ends here. I have better things than to spend days debating about it, and having it end up as usual: One claims that the facts against his case aren't true, and claims that he just proved his case right. (Hint: That person I just referenced ain't me.)