19 Civilizations, let's guess!

it's not just about who lasted the longest, or which civ started first, but it's also about civ's that made a large impacts to history and the world.

the us is more than qualified to be in - if anything it's amazing that within its 200 year existance, it's affected the world in immeasurable ways, where its decisions have at points had consequences that impact billions - the american revolution was def. a contributing factor that led to future revolutions around the world, its independence and policies of manifest destiny not only deterred european interference (at least compared to the scale beforehand), but also affected countless natives in north america. the result wwi and esp. wwii were definitely changed by us involvement.

by some of the suggested standards previously posted, it wud be just as absurd to put in others civs - the aztecs were only a major power in the late 1300 - early 1500s, existing not that much longer than the united states (relative to some of the older civs) germany as a nation didn't exist until 1871. the mongols, while definitely changing the course of history in its conquests, were only really prominent 12-14th centuries, before declining.

america, however, unlike how it was portrayed in civ3, should be classified more under a "european" civ. either way though, there really is no argument on the degree and magnitude america has made in the world. and history's not over yet. for all you know america may exist somehow for another 5000 years, while other civs disappear.

i think it would help to understand the definition of a civilization as well - it doesn't necessarily mean an old and lasting culture/people. one source defines it - "the type of culture and society developed by a particular nation or region or in a particular epoch: Mayan civilization; the civilization of ancient Rome." the us definitely fits as a particular nation in our modern epoch.
 
Assuming that the German preview thread info is correct the 10 civs so far confirmed are America, Aztecs, Germany, India, Mongolia, Persia, Japan, Egypt, China and the Arabs. These are all pretty understandable and I personally don't have any problems with any of them(besides the Aztecs) being in. That still leaves 9 to guess though. Here is the ones I'd like to see make the list, and a few that I hope don't make it.

My top 9:

1) Incas. Way more deserving than the Aztecs in my opinion. They lasted as a power for much longer, over a much larger population and territorial holdings. Not really sure what their leader(s) and UU would be.

2) Rome or Greece. I'd be suprised (pleasantly, to be honest) if only one of them made it, and shocked if neither did. I don't like how the civs are ususally stacked from the Classical age, but one of these two should be in. Peferably Rome. Legion UU with Julius and Constantine as leaders.

3) Ottomans/Turks. Along with the Arabs, scaring the living hell out of Christiendom for centuries should make them a lock. Janissaries or Siege Cannons as UU, and Mehmed II or Suleyman I as leaders.

4) England. Well established globe-spanning empire. Complete no-brainer. Dreadnought UU, William I and Elizabeth I as leaders.

5) Spain or Portugal. While both are very deserving of a spot, there are only 19 slots. The civs are generally too Eurocentric as it is, and having both former world powers from Iberia (3 if you count Gibraltar :D) would be overkill. I'd personally pefrer Portugal but am unsure of UU or leaders (Alfonzo I maybe?).

6) Sumeria. The cradle of civilization never gets enough love. Unsure of UU or leaders.

7) France. Same reason as England, though on a somewhat lesser scale. Unsure of UUs but Louis XIV and Nappy as leaders.

8) Mayans. Ancient American and highly innovative for its time civ. Also more deserving than the Aztecs. Unsure about UU and leaders.

9) Korea. An interesting, self-isolated kingdom in the past and a huge market for gaming today. Mostly I want to pick Korea in the slim chance Crazy Uncle Kim is a leader. Now that would be a fun AI personality.

Civs I don't want to see in the other 9:

-Celts. Barbarians.
-Vikings. See above.
-Carthage. I really never got this one. A small-time trade empire whose only claim to fame was losing war after war to Rome and starving elephants in the Alps. Huh?
-The Dutch, Polish, Swiss, etc. The game is already too Eurocentric as it is, geez.
-Any sub-saharian african country. Being a colonial speedbump doesn't make you very important in the grand scheme of things. This is also why the Aztecs shouldn't be in.

Hey, wow that was a lot of words. I think I'll stop now. :crazyeye:
 
ybbor said:
1. Rome
2. Greece
3. Germany
4. France
5. England
6. Russia
7. Egypt
9. India
10. Japan
11. China
12. Babylon
13. Aztecs
14. Sioux
15. Polynesia
16. Austria
17. Arabia
18. Mongols
19. Persia

I basically took Ovxford's list and changed a few things

And add one more... you've only listed 18.
[flame]And for Austria i definitly have to protest, i'd rather see the Swiss.[/flame]
 
LLXerxes said:
1 Rome
2 Greece
3 Egypt
4 England
5 Germany
6 France
7 Japan
8 Spain
9 China
10 Russia
11 India
12 Souix
13 Aztecs
14 Babylon
15 Persia
16 Mali/Zulu
17 Mayans
18 Americans
19 Iroquois Federation

Honestly i don't think they will add two native american nations (Sioux/Iroquois). Rather i see them adding an additional asian nation like the koreans...
 
They make civs based on influence and power. This is my )
1. Rome (Best civ ever, most impact, superempire)
2. Greece (Literature, Knowledge, Culture unsurpassed except by Rome)
3. England (British Empire was Massive, founded USA)
4. China (Big nation historic)
5. Arabia (Founded Islam, ruled large empire)
6. Mongols (Largest land Empire)
7. America (Pax American, founders of UN, airplanes, many technologies)
8. Israel (First to believe in one God. Founders of Judaism and in long run Christian and Islamic world. How many of you have Jewish names, I do.)
9. Russia
10. Germany
11. Japan
12. France
13. India (Further down because they have never done much)
14. Turks (Could be higher, violent civ)
15. Persia
16. Aztecs
17. Spain (Can you say Latin America)
18. Egypt
19. Assyria (First nation to conquer entire world)

These are 19 most influential nations throughout history in my opinion although some important runner ups are : Songhai, Portugal, Dutch, Austrians, Incas, Byzantines, Korea, and Phoenicia.
 
LOL the reason civs are Eurocentric is because most the world powers came out of Europe Period. Europe was the center of the world from 1400-1945 and also had Rome, Byzantium, and Greece pre 1400. It is a mistake to make regional civs, civs should be based on power and influence overall in the world.
 
confirmed: America, Aztecs, Germany, India, Mongolia, Persia, Japan, Egypt, China and the Arabs.

thus the 9 left imo are:
- England/Britain (whatever you want to call it - self-explaining)
- France (self-explaining)
- Rome (self-explaining)
- Greece (self-explaining)
- Russia (self-explaining)
- One American (either Iroquois, Inca or Maya)
- One African (either Mali, Ethiopia or Zulu [the least preferable])
- One Mesopotamian one (either the real Babylon [not the one of civ3], Sumeria or Assyria [the most preferable])
- the filler: preferably the Turks (Ottoman Empire), but also possible are the vikings, Spain, Poland, Khmer or another American or Mesopotamian one (possible Phoenicia instead of Carthage!)

my 2 €-cents mitsho
 
there's no denying that several european nations - england, france, spain, italy/rome, germany, the netherlands, russia, etc. all have had important impacts, and prob. through expansion packs will all be included. at the same time, i disagree and think regional civs shud be in at all - as historically important as they all are, you after a while, at least for me, i need to change it up. plus it's fun to always imagine what the world would have been like if the mayans survived, if the iroquois drove out the europeans, etc. b'sides, world history isn't just btw 1400-1945, or limited to the european continent - most of the world flourished while europe fell into the dark ages.

honestly, it wud be nice to get the israelites as a civ - no doubt about the profound impact they've had, not just in the middle east, but to the world. altho it didn't dawn on me until this morning y it's highly unlikely they'll ever be put in, just b/c of all the sensitivity. def. understable, but a shame nonetheless.
 
OxfordPferd said:
15. Africa (It's a whole continent! It needs at least one civ. I don't think it will be the Zulus again. There are so many alternatives. Mali, Ethiopia or Bantu maybe? )

Egypt lays in Africa and if you want a second African civ, you can take Carthage.
I don't think the other tribes in Africa can be called civs because they didn't do anything special like a big buildings, big armies,...
And if you want a civ for every continent, you also have to add the aborigenals for Australia.(and there is no civ for Antartica ofcourse)
 
@Bartholomaï Have you ever heard of Mali, Songhai and Ethiopia, just to name the top three. If I just mention the name of Timbuctu, you probably will get it, cause this city is really 'famous'. ;)
And it's not without reason that there were some nubian pharaos of Egypt (which - together with Carthage) I count to the mediterranean civs, if we really can do such groups). In Addition, Civ 1 - 3 have the Zulus which (probably) should represent Africa, so even the producer think they're worth it.

mfG mitsho

PS: If you haven't heard of these civilizations above before, go and look here: www.wikipedia.com I'm sure, you'll find enough information in English and your language (I haven't checked).
 
yeah, though technically both on the same continent, sub-saharan africa is differentiated from the northern maghreb region - but yeah def. as mitsho was saying, several kingdoms including mali, songhai, and ethiopia were world-renown in their day, and were very important when it came to trading, esp. with the middle east. i'd def. like to see some african civ's in the game. the diff. btw the african civ's and australia, is that, while the natives in australia were fairly isolated, the african civ's def. did make contact and play influential roles to several diff civ's, from europe to asia.
 
I'd say Egypt, then Mali and Abyssinia, and then the Zulu would be worthy African civilizations. I'd try to fit in at least the first three, especially since Egypt is kind of borderline Near-Eastern.
 
America, Aztecs, Germany, India, Mongolia, Persia, Japan, Egypt, China and the Arabs are in already. They sould DEFINATELY have the Romans - one of the best civs out there - and probably Greece too. As for African civs, (besides Egypt) Mali should be the one. Probably commercial/scientific, but I'm not too sure. No idea as to UU
 
sepamu92 said:
Probably commercial/scientific, but I'm not too sure. No idea as to UU

You seem to forget that it's a new game. I'm pretty sure the old trait-system will be changed. UUs haven't been mentioned yet either AFAIK.
 
I'm stoked they have included Mongolia from the get-go :bounce: :banana: :bounce: :banana: :bounce: They did something right ;)

Anyway, my guesses of the 19 would be:
1. America
2. Arabs
3. Aztecs
4. China
5. Egypt
6. Germany
7. India
8. Japan
9. Mongolia
10. Persia
---
11. Babylon
12. England
13. France
14. Greece
15. Incas or Mayans
16. Iroquois, Sioux, etc. etc.
17. Rome
18. Russia
19. Zulus
 
OxfordPferd said:
You seem to forget that it's a new game. I'm pretty sure the old trait-system will be changed. UUs haven't been mentioned yet either AFAIK.
Ah yes, I guess you're right. But, from what they've said so far about Great Leaders, it seems they still have the same ol' civ traits.
 
PriestOfDiscord said:
If there had to be a second African civ, I'd take Abyssinia/Ethiopia over Carthage any day.


Thats bull. Carthage was the superpower of the med before rome even came to power. They ruled the whole coast of north africa almost. And u are going to say Ethiopia deserves to be in over carthage? Im sorry i just think that that is complete bull. Carthage is also the reason that the Romans fell, along with all those barbaric nations.. But they're uu should be hannibal's elephants instead of Numids...
 
Back
Top Bottom