Dismukes out for Auburn in the opener. I'd say that swings the pendulum back in Clemson's favor for the moment.
Saban went on record today arguing that the top "60 or 70" teams in FBS should split into a separate division. What's most interesting about this to me is watching what motivates his decisions.
If you look at Alabama's schedule this year, we play three teams that wouldn't be in that top 60 - 70 league. But Saban's rationale for his argument was that it wasn't fair that a one or two loss team that plays a good schedule would get jumped by an undefeated team with a lesser schedule for a spot in the four team playoff. It seems irrational that he would make that argument while we are playing those softer teams ourselves.
But if you look at his long term complaints, one of the biggest that he brings up most frequently is the SEC's decision to stick to an eight game schedule after expanding to fourteen teams. If we went to nine games, that would certainly hurt us compared to teams that play in conferences with less depth. The "super league" is Saban's solution, because it guarantees that everyone is playing vs. decent teams every week.
So then the question is why does he want us to play nine conference games. And the answer is because with a nine game schedule we'd cycle through every SEC team's home stadium in four years. Why is that important? Because he wants to be able to walk into those Texas and Georgia and Florida living rooms and tell the parents of his recruits about how they'll come home to play vs. the in state school one day. That's it, and he says so flat out.
Saban wants a 60 - 70 team super conference because it helps him recruit.
You can't argue with success, but his single-mindedness on this is borderline comic. I'm not saying I wouldn't prefer a smaller, more competitive division within the FBS, but it seems like an extreme solution to a recruiting problem . . .
EDIT: Fun facts!
The %age of teams from each FBS conference that would make the 70 team cutoff, per Sagarin's preseason rankings:
SEC -- 93%
Big XII -- 90%
Big East -- 87.5%
ACC -- 83.3%
Pac-12 -- 83.3%
Big Ten -- 75%
Independents -- 75%
CUSA -- 33.3%
MWC -- 30%
WAC -- 14%
MAC -- 7.7%
Sunbelt -- 0%
Now, Sagarin's ranking are eerily accurate for gamblers picking against the spread late in the season, but his preseason rankings are admittedly a bit arbitrary. This is just to give you an idea of what it would look like . . .