GarretSidzaka
Modder
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2002
- Messages
- 4,700
that is because something is trying to reference something thats not there, or perhaps a typo
That's probably a good idea. I'm no civ expert so I just guessed on the graph.
Neoliberalism - +3, +1
![]()
Conservatism - +2, +2
![]()
Nationalism - +1, +3
![]()
Communism - +3, +1
Autonomism - +2, +2
Anarchism - +1, +3
Do you have a list of civics yet? I was thinking that maybe they should be kept as apolitical and abstract as possible, so that all the civs have the opportunity to use any of them. For example, there could be a 'justice' category with 'summary execution', 'jury trial' and 'mob justice' and so on. For economics you could perhaps have a focus on different areas like industrial production, urban development or agriculture. For military you could have 'conscription', 'militia', 'standing army' and others. Perhaps a 'political tolerance' category too? Just a few thoughts.
signing in / subscribing
Hey wait, Garret: What happened to that map with all those cities placed, that you'd shown us a screenshot of in this thread? Why wasn't that the scenario included?
Edit: Also, the given scenario, with only the capitals placed, crashed after a few turns,