3.16 unit table
- Thread starter mystikx21
- Start date
Ahriman
Tyrant
The other problem is: we don't want warfare to be the same in every era, and we want to have some kind of historical feel. Artillery should be dominating the WW1 battlefield, until landships arrive.
Armored cars were never a major factor in combat or warfare, and for motorized and mechanized infantry we already have representations of that (3 move ww2 infantry, then the mech inf unit).
Much easier to merge both dragoon and lancer into the landship.
Armored cars were never a major factor in combat or warfare, and for motorized and mechanized infantry we already have representations of that (3 move ww2 infantry, then the mech inf unit).
Much easier to merge both dragoon and lancer into the landship.
As another note, I would set the unit cost scale back to 1.8x from 2x as now, with the reasoning being that I'd propose reducing the early game production bonuses in liberty (no free wall+engineer slot+bonus production on the wall), with some milder early production bonuses in honor (on the barracks/for units), bonus production to buildings in liberty.
This would mean that most units would have costs (at standard speed) roughly 10x the unit strength or ranged strength, which is fairly easy to keep track of.
Proposed Exceptions to that rule
In most cases these discounts are less than what is used in the current CEP design.
This would mean that most units would have costs (at standard speed) roughly 10x the unit strength or ranged strength, which is fairly easy to keep track of.
Proposed Exceptions to that rule
Spoiler :
In most cases these discounts are less than what is used in the current CEP design.
I will be trying to merge these various proposed changes, the economic changes, and most of the policy proposals from the policy threads into a mod that can be active by early next week and that hopefully expired/eric et al can tinker with as needed if I can't get everything in myself that is relatively straightforward.
I'll have a phase two set of changes based on feedback and on stuff I (probably) didn't get to in time (replacing liburna for Rome for example), or if there are bugs with some feature changes, and then it will be mostly waiting for the dll/UI mods to catch up.
I'll have a phase two set of changes based on feedback and on stuff I (probably) didn't get to in time (replacing liburna for Rome for example), or if there are bugs with some feature changes, and then it will be mostly waiting for the dll/UI mods to catch up.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
