Elgalad said:Jawz, there would not Be an America today if we had lost the Cold War. Or a Europe, or an Asia, probably not a South America or Africa either. Australia.. maybe, but doubtful. The Cold war was not about the USA vs the USSR. It was about whether or not either Democracy or Stalinism would finally triumph without a nuclear war. And when it did finally end, the entire world won.
Jawz II said:no, i seriously doubt the russians wouldve taken over the world,they were still just one nation, even if a big one
they have fought wars with their neighbours, lost some and won some through history, and not one time have they conquered the whole word
what you are playing up is paranoid american anti communism, they wouldnt even have taken over eastern europe if it wasnt for hitler and his buncha paranoid anti communist henchmen(lets mess them up before they do it to us)
basicly the same mentality that started ww2, also started the cold war
The Last Conformist said:Tell the stalinists.
Star Wars was certainly the most serious issue of the last 50 years.thestonesfan said:If they make a funny movie about it, we might laugh. Like Space Balls makes the Star Wars seem funny, but at the time, they were the last thing you would joke about!
That's mixing two uses of "about". The reason for the enmity was certainly ideological/political, and clearly one side lost. The situation also entailed a threat of civilizational collapse by nuclear war; I'm sure just about nobody deplores the fact that a such is now less likely. That, however, doesn't mean that everybody thinks it was worth the cost - it's not too hard to find people who wish the Wall never fell. The head of the Swedish section of Attaque* expressed, a couple of years ago, her wish that the Soviet Union was still around to contain US "aggression".Elgalad said:You missed the point of my post. The entire world won Because the long dreaded nuclear interchange never occurred. As I said, the Cold War may have appeared ideological, but it was really about the survival of civilization or its destruction in a nuclear holocaust.
I already do. But somehow it's just not funny any more.stratego said:Do you think that 50 years later people will laugh at how we react towards terrorism?