There is pretty good evidence that Chinese fentanyl (or precursors) are being sent to Mexico for drug sales in the US. Xi's government has not made much of an effort to stop it. The question is: could China stop the production and shipment of those items? I think they could make significant headway, but choose not to. That leads to the next question of whether the Mexican cartels could find an alternative source or change the formula to something more benign or more deadly.To be clear, you are intending to claim that US drug problems with like, stuff being tainted with fentanyl, are being deliberately incited by a foreign government?
They did this in Austria for while, it seemed to work.I suppose we could just gift all the recreationals at high purity from the state at subsidized rates and try to flood it out. That's a thought. Not entirely sure about the downstream on that one. Countries would likely be furious with the US for flooding the world with cheap addictive substances.
Did they stop?They did this in Austria for while, it seemed to work.
I do not think so, but I know nothing about it for some years. This says in 2018 55% of those on substitution medication were on morphine.Did they stop?
The ignorance is strong with this oneIn some ways I feel disappointed that my comment was branched off into its own topic, as my one and only view on solving the problems of drug abuse is for people to not take them. It may be a difficult solution but it is the ultimate one.
Perhaps I am fortunate that I have a steady job and volunteer activities that the very last thing on my mind is: "you know, I'd feel even better if I shoot something into me and wind up in some vegetative state where I see pretty colors for a few minutes..."
Well, uh, yeah, at the individual level obviously "don't do drug" is the best stance with drugs.In some ways I feel disappointed that my comment was branched off into its own topic, as my one and only view on solving the problems of drug abuse is for people to not take them. It may be a difficult solution but it is the ultimate one.
Perhaps I am fortunate that I have a steady job and volunteer activities that the very last thing on my mind is: "you know, I'd feel even better if I shoot something into me and wind up in some vegetative state where I see pretty colors for a few minutes..."
Yes, but that campaign was not just an ad campaign. Smokers were shoved outside or to enclosed places where they can gather to indulge. In addition, smoking is done openly and has immediate effects on those around the smoker. Non smokers will often openly scorn or shun smokers. Fentanyl users are less public with their habit.The smoking campaigns seem to have moved the needle.
Compelled speech, in a way.
Cheaper & better for the economy just legalize safer pain relief like cannabis.Trump says he’s planning ‘large-scale’ ad campaign on fentanyl crisis
Loading…
thehill.com
IIRC the "Just say no" campaign solved all of drug problems.
Just Say No - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I don't think 'smoking isn't cool' ads worked, people just realized it for themselves, and it took a long time.The smoking campaigns seem to have moved the needle.
Compelled speech, in a way.
I think only a minority of people are best served by “don’t do drugs” and abstinence.Well, uh, yeah, at the individual level obviously "don't do drug" is the best stance with drugs.
That being said, that's kinda useless beyond TV ads to tackle drug use as a societal problem. Trying to understand why they do it and fixing these causes has probably a much better rate of success than just lecturing them about it.
I'm not lecturing anyone. They're free to take drugs and I'm free to call them foolish for doing it. There's no problem that I see.Well, uh, yeah, at the individual level obviously "don't do drug" is the best stance with drugs.
That being said, that's kinda useless beyond TV ads to tackle drug use as a societal problem. Trying to understand why they do it and fixing these causes has probably a much better rate of success than just lecturing them about it.