A new swedish grading system!

Is this good or bad?


  • Total voters
    36
I haven't seen a letter grade in a long time on my report cards. I've gotten only percentages in all of high school which makes the most sense. Actually, I got letter grades when I took a class at Harvard, which I think explains some of the huge inflation there - my friend had an average in the 65-70 range and got a B+. They couldn't hide a number like a letter. Me I got a real A, a 94, so don't worry. ;)
 
It's double plus good! :D
 
I don't think it matters as long as some kind of feedback is given.

I do think it's kind of stupid to have three different kinds of "good", and then a fail, though.... as if just "not failing" was in some way "good" :rolleyes:
 
Here we have:

1 - you did not know anything at all, or you were caught copying/cheating
2
3
4
5 - you need this to pass the class, you fail without it
6 - you need this at some subjects to pass the class if you're at a special school (e.g.: Music theory in a music highschool)
7
8
9
10 - perfect

The year has 2 semesters. In each subject, you need "the number of hours of that subject per week" marks, exception for those subjects that are only once a week, where you need 2, so the number of classes per week + 1.

At the end of a semester, an average is made for each subject. At the end of the second semester, same. At the end of the year, an average is made on each subject between the average on the first semester and the one on the second semester.

If your average per year on any subject is less than 5 (or 6 in special subjects, as I mentioned above), you will have a really hard exam in the autumn. If you don't pass that, you repeat the class.

There are also some more important subjects, where an "exam" ("teza") is given at the end of each semester. In highschool (9-10), those are Mathematics, Romanian, English (or French, depending of school), and special subjects (Music History and Instrument for music, Physics and computer science for some highschools, etc). This count a little more than a normal mark to your average.

The average is done like this: if you have a 9 and a 10 in a semester, the average will be 10. But the yearly average is NOT rounded. I had 9.95 last year. :smug:

I find this system almost perfect. :)
 
Too complicated, just combine the average of exams, little tests, activity in lessons and the quality of your homework in the scale 4-10.
 
The school district where we live has:

ES - Exceeds Standards
MS - Meets Standards
BS - Below Standards (no jokes please)
FBS - Far Below Standards

This equates to the following, meaning they have eliminated either the top or 2nd top grade.
A/B = ES
C = MS
D = BS
F = FBS
 
The school district where we live has:

ES - Exceeds Standards
MS - Meets Standards
BS - Below Standards (no jokes please)
FBS - Far Below Standards

This equates to the following, meaning they have eliminated either the top or 2nd top grade.
A/B = ES
C = MS
D = BS
F = FBS

Why do they feel the need to do that? Why not stick with the standard grading system.

How is that any more effective may i ask?
 
In a humble American opinion, your old style was crazy. We started getting grades in 3rd grade and we had a system so that you could easily tell how well you did (you know, 93-100=A).
 
Kids should get graded starting at kindergarten. I was.

Poor you.

Grades can suck it. Don't indicate how much you learn, don't even motivate people to learn.
 
The Romanian system (post 45, Mirc) is the best so far.

Grading system doesn't measure how much they learn, it merely "motivates" (read pressure) kids. Ideally grading should start at Year 5: it's not too early nor too late.

By the way in Melbourne we changed the system last year. Traditionally the grading is from A - E (A+ is 90-100% and E is 50 - 55% I think. Below that is a fail). Now, the kids are graded compared to others in the state, C represent the mark that most kids in that year should be getting, A means they're doing roughly 2 years ahead of their own year, and E means 2 years below where they should be.
 
Be careful about American & Canadian school system: the states and provinces have control the schools; thus it may vary from state to state, province to province.

Quebec, Canada - note the system changed with new educational reforms introduced just as I was leaving them (thank God).

Primary (K-6 "old school")

A, B, C = passing
D, F, [E] = failure

Primary (K, Cycle 1-3, each cycle two years, "new school")

I don't have a clue; and neither do the parents or teachers. It something about competencies and such.

Secondary (Grade 7-11, "old school")

100-60 = passing
59-0 = failure

Secondary (I don't know, "new school")

I don't have a clue; and neither do the parents or teachers. It something about competencies and such.

CEGEP (Collège d'enseignement général et professionnel, eng. "College of General and Professional Education." : special type of college, based on junior college state-sides, with two years pre-university, three-years career)

100-60 = passing
59-0 = failure

CRC = special type of statistical measure, used only in Quebec for university admission

University

I don't know. Probably like CEGEP, but may vary with each university.
 
Well in America we have
A
B
C
D
F

Starting pretty early on...
Why is there no "E"?

Anyway in New Zeland theres only 4 possible grades.

Not Achieved-NA
Achieved-A
Merit-M
Excellence-E

A popular joke in schools is saying if you got just an "A" "In America this would be a higher mark"
 
I don't see why anyone wouldn't just use a percentage. The only thing I can see that could be necessary in addition is a percentile for the class.
 
Poor you.

Grades can suck it. Don't indicate how much you learn, don't even motivate people to learn.

You have a better idea of testing kids on the material? While i get mad at my grades, i know a grading system is necessary, even for kids.
 
A popular joke in schools is saying if you got just an "A" "In America this would be a higher mark"

Ok i dont get it... What does A and the fact that America starts with an A have to do with anything? :confused:
 
Ok i dont get it... What does A and the fact that America starts with an A have to do with anything? :confused:

It has absolutely nothing to do with the name America starting with A. In America, A is the highest grade. There, A stands for Achieved and is the second worst grade. So when someone gets an "A" in NZ, they say "In America, my mark would be high".
 
Dawpghood001 said:
Poor you.

Grades can suck it. Don't indicate how much you learn, don't even motivate people to learn.

They do, if your grandma or someone like that will reward you with money. :mischief:
 
It has absolutely nothing to do with the name America starting with A. In America, A is the highest grade. There, A stands for Achieved and is the second worst grade. ;)

I dont think the letters actually stand for anything. Thats just a coincedence you stated. B doesnt stand for anything, C doesnt stand for anything, and D doesnt stand for anything is far as i know.

Its just descending order from the start of the alphabet.. excluding E. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom