AK-47 inventor has died

One wonders how much longer the Kalasknikov design will endure.
800px-AK-12_Engineering_technologies_international_forum_-_2012_01.jpg
 
AK was a weapon of independence. Nuclear bomb is a weapon of peace. And those who do not get it are collateral casualties of the weapon called propaganda.
 
Kalishnikov designed a great rifle, he was not a mass murderer. He came up with the design in World War II while recuperating in a hospital from wounds from fighting the Nazis. The purpose was to defend his country which is honorable.

The iconic AK-47 is simple, inexpensive and effective. In Afghanistan I have a nice 1960 AKM that still works fine even after 53 years.

P.S. If someone thinks that they are causing the deaths of millions by driving a car and contributing to "global warming", all I can say is seek professional counseling.
 
P.S. If someone thinks that they are causing the deaths of millions by driving a car and contributing to "global warming", all I can say is seek professional counseling.

First world guilt is a wonderful thing. It allows people who are already entitled to feel entitled to further self-importance, self-righteousness and snobbery. After all, they feel so much for the suffering peoples of the world. They voted for Kucinich, they're doing their part :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, this is turning into a mudslinging feast already.

I'll just say I respect the ingenuity and intelligence required to engineer such a gun regardless of the technological optimism/pessimism angle, say RIP, and sneak away.
 
To stick the blame on him is ridiculous in any case. The weapon was designed and fine tuned by dozens of other engineers and soldiers. Soviet propaganda only made him look like the sole actor that dreamed up everything because people like one-man-army heroes/inventors/whatever.

I don't know much about his history. I just figured he was the sole designer.

He's no John Browning (my real hero of gun design).

And yes I understand the irony of criticizing a Russian gun maker when I have a picture of a Russian with a gun in my avatar. :D

I still say guns are evil devices, and personally I would never design one even if I could. I'd design toys for children or something. As was mentioned above, the industrial revolution is as much to blame as anything.
 
I still say guns are evil devices

Firearms are inanimate objects incapable of anything less than what an outside force does with it. Unless you're talking about magic spells or demonic possession or something. That's a different story altogether.
 
Firearms are inanimate objects incapable of anything less than what an outside force does with it. Unless you're talking about magic spells or demonic possession or something. That's a different story altogether.

This argument, again? :(
It really is not a good argument, given that hands also potentially can be used to harm or even kill another person, but we routinely chop hands off in a pre-emptive manner and no one so much as raises an arm against that.
 
He died in peace?

Hope not!

Most of the people died in many pieces, after his gun was shot.
 
Kalashnikov - The Best frackin' assault rifle in the world !! - it never jamms - You can swimm with it, bury it in sand or dump it in the snow and it will still work ! ;) R.I.P
 
It's hard to fathom how many deaths this man is responsible for. Rot in hell.

He can blame the politicians, but many of those deaths are from terrorists, drug kingpins, etc.

I am somewhat curious about what do You think about Alfred Nobel ? :crazyeye:
 
This argument, again? :(
It really is not a good argument, given that hands also potentially can be used to harm or even kill another person, but we routinely chop hands off in a pre-emptive manner and no one so much as raises an arm against that.

Technological optimism v. pessimism is actually fairly interesting when people can get away from the gun issue and talk about it more generally.
 
Good lord, are people really saying this guy should be rotting in hell?

If you're going to take that stance, your should probably do you research and boycott any company or any person that had anything to do with a weapon. That list is very large.
 
This argument, again? :(
It really is not a good argument, given that hands also potentially can be used to harm or even kill another person, but we routinely chop hands off in a pre-emptive manner and no one so much as raises an arm against that.

So is this in agreement with my post? I'm not sure.

it never jamms - You can swimm with it, bury it in sand or dump it in the snow and it will still work ! ;) R.I.P

Although they're inherently robust and reliable, they actually do jam and the rest you mention is true for most modern firearms.
 
It's hard to fathom how many deaths this man is responsible for. Rot in hell.

He can blame the politicians, but many of those deaths are from terrorists, drug kingpins, etc.

He is not responsible for anything. If not Kalashnikov's AK-47, terrorists would use Mauser's or someone else's weapons.

======================

And Afred Nobel's example is very good. Rot in hell Alfred Nobel - you are responsible for all IEDs used by Talibans! :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom