iamnleth
Warlord
The point of stonehenge is that it will be built in the first 30-40 turns by the AI... He can't build it unless he built it before the first settler and as such the cost is way too high...
I agree completely. Trying to nab 'Henge after the first settler is a BIG gamble and the gold you would receive as a result of losing the race would not compensate for the loss of hammers.
Playing with two extra civs BUT no 'low sea level'! Well. That's definitely stacking in favour of the human and an early rush. AND you're Boudica!
Without low sea level the two extra civs will mean all civs will be crammed in much closer! This will effectively negate many of the AI's bonuses at Immortal level when it comes to early REX'ing, and we all know how bad the AI is at declaring war when there's no land left in which to expand peacefully. If you're adding extra civs, which I fully endorse by the way, you simply have to lower the sea level.
I agree. Stacking the odds in favor of the civ or leader that the human is playing, while fun, makes the game that much easier. Low sea level solves this problem by providing an appropriate amount of additional land.