NATO recon aircraft don't turn their transponders on either.That's not what specifically fiddling with the transponders say though.

Al-Qaeda, you mean?while bombing the actual guys who fight against ISIL
NATO recon aircraft don't turn their transponders on either.That's not what specifically fiddling with the transponders say though.
Al-Qaeda, you mean?while bombing the actual guys who fight against ISIL
There were opposite cases, involving NATO recon aircraft near Russian airspace.
Any chance Erdogan and Putin could be long-lost brothers or something? Similarities are scary.
Erdogan challenging Putin for his claims Turkey is trading with IS:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34971506
^Erdo being a paragon of virtue is the right being to challenge others![]()
I think this will escalate further, cause i don't see Erdo resigning; he is too filled with the idea he is the savior of the turkish state or whatever, to realise he is the obvious trigger for nastier things to come there.
(oh, and BBC being as crap as ever)
Which got under humanitarian bombing from RussiaAllegations of oil trade are outrageous, ISIS was just sending humanitarian convoys to Turkey.
Too late: Putin now accuses Turkey of shooting down their plane 'to protect IS oil'. Because, you know, shooting down a single plane will do that, obviously...
And here's some entertainment from our esteemed Greek member, whose political-economic views are always hilarious:
Very to the point, I'm sure...
Our esteemed member has missed the somewhat obvious fact that Putin is the only one doing the escalating. Erdogan seems genuinely embarassed by the incident.
"oh, and BBC being as crap as ever" speaks for itself.
Certainly. Refugees, going to ISIS controlled territory'Humanitarian convoys' is an euphemism for refugees, obviously.
Certainly. Refugees, going to ISIS controlled territory![]()
No, it's parodying the "humanitarian convoys" Russia sent to Ukraine.'Humanitarian convoys' is an euphemism for refugees, obviously.
I hardly am supporting the rebels in Ukraine.I've noticed your support to the rebel notions in both Ukraine and Syria, and I would cautiously assume that you also would be sympathizing to any power rising up against Putin in Russia today.
So it makes me curious about whether it's just a rebellious spirit of yours, or there are some more complex criteria... If so, what are they?
Sorry, my fault, I was insufficiently clear. I meant the ones who ousted Yanukovich.I hardly am supporting the rebels in Ukraine.
That is understandable...As for Syria, I wasn't aware someone needed to have some kind of "rebellious spirit" to prefer people fighting against a bloodthirsty tyrant than to have said tyrant drown the rebellion in blood.
...well, there were some things for a preset, and then the Bloody Sunday as a trigger, and also many things next...And I don't really see what the Russian revolts and revolutions have to do with this...
Criteria is simple actually - support anything which is portrayed as pro-Western, and bash anything which is perceived as pro-Russian.So it makes me curious about whether it's just a rebellious spirit of yours, or there are some more complex criteria... If so, what are they?
Akka, may I ask about your thoughts about the Russian revolutions in 1905 and 1917?
I've noticed your support to the rebel notions in both Ukraine and Syria, and I would cautiously assume that you also would be sympathizing to any power rising up against Putin in Russia today.
So it makes me curious about whether it's just a rebellious spirit of yours, or there are some more complex criteria... If so, what are they?